TY - JOUR T1 - Meeting Report—Workshop on Virus Removal by Filtration: Trends and New Developments JF - PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology JO - PDA J Pharm Sci Technol SP - 98 LP - 104 DO - 10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00907 VL - 67 IS - 2 AU - Hannelore Willkommen AU - Johannes BlüMel AU - Kurt Brorson AU - Dayue Chen AU - Qi Chen AU - Albrecht GröNer AU - Thomas R. Kreil AU - James S. Robertson AU - Michael Ruffing AU - Sol Ruiz Y1 - 2013/03/01 UR - http://journal.pda.org/content/67/2/98.abstract N2 - The workshop was held on 27 June 2011 in Barcelona, in conjunction with the PDA Virus & TSE (transmissible spongiform encephalopathy) Safety Forum 2011. Virus-retentive filters are important tools to assure a high virus safety level of biological medicinal products. Important parameters such as properties of virus spike preparations, mechanism of virus retention by different filter brands, use of prefilters to improve the filtration performance, and, finally, strategies to select the most appropriate filter for a specific product were discussed on the workshop. The panel discussion at the end of the workshop that involved speakers and regulators from different global areas came to following conclusions: The major mechanism of virus retention is size exclusion; filtration, however, is complex and protein and virus can interact with the membrane in multiple ways. Pressure interruption during filtration resulted in enhanced virus passage.It has never been reported that murine leukemia virus (MuLV) passes a parvovirus filter. It makes sense that a small virus can be used to provide a claim for a large virus like MuLV. This relies on the assumption that there is no aggregation or interaction of the model parvovirus with proteins leading to aggregates larger than retroviruses.Several prefilters are under investigation to improve flow rate and throughput of filtration in large-scale manufacture. It was discussed whether the prefilter and the virus-retentive filter can be viewed as one unit operation so that virus retention by both can be claimed as the viral clearance capacity of this manufacturing step. This question engendered some controversy: whereas some saw the combination as a correct reflection of manufacturing conditions, others discussed the different mechanisms of virus retention, which need to be studied separately. All together, the workshop was seen as a valuable forum for the discussion between regulators and industry; it was proposed that such forum should be provided again if possible in connection with one of the next PDA Virus & TSE Safety Conferences. LAY ABSTRACT: The workshop was held on 27 June 2011 in Barcelona, in conjunction with the PDA Virus & TSE (transmissible spongiform encephalopathy) Safety Forum 2011. Virus-retentive filters are important tools to assure a high virus safety level of biological medicinal products. Important parameters such as properties of virus spike preparations, mechanism of virus retention by different filter brands, use of prefilters to improve the filtration performance and, finally, strategies to select the most appropriate filter for a specific product were discussed on the workshop. At the end of the workshop, aspects of the discussion were summarized by the following: The major mechanism of virus retention is size exclusion, but interactions are complex. Pressure interruption during filtration resulted in enhanced virus passage.It has never been reported that murine leukemia virus (MuLV) passes a parvovirus filter, and thus the parvovirus may provide a claim for a large virus like MuLV.Combination of prefilter and the virus-retentive filter are seen by some panelists as a correct reflection of manufacturing conditions; others discussed the different mechanisms of virus retention, which need to be studied separately. All together, the workshop was seen as a valuable forum for the discussion between regulators and industry. ER -