TABLE VI

Correlation Studies

StudyType of Artificial LeakCCSStudied Range/SizeArtificial Leak with No/Zero IngressEquivalent He leak Flow for Zero Ingress (mbar * L/s)Critical Leak Size: Substantial increase in risk/frequency for microbial ingress (% of tested units)Critical Leak Size: Equivalent He leak flow for substantial ingress (mbar*L/s)Reference
Morical et al.(outside-in)Wire in rubber stopper15 mL vial10–120 µm15 µm1.3-1.8E-0520 µm2.2–2.8E-05(5)
Stainless-steel orifice disks15 mL vial0.5–15 µm (FED)2 µm1.4E-034 µm6.1E-03
Mathaes et al.(outside-in)Wire in rubber stopperVials of undefined sizeHe flow rate10-8 to 10-1ND4E-07ND≈1E-05(13)
Burrel et al. (no He leak determinations)Fused silica capillaries5 mL vials2–75 µm (ID) × 30 mm L5 µm3.7 E-06b10 µm (70%)2.3E-05b(14)
Kirsch et al. (inside-out)Glass pipettes10 mL vials0.1–10 µm0.2 µm2.2 E-070.4 µm2.0E-06a(3)
Keller (no He leak determinations)Nickel microtubesBioaerosol test chambers of 8 cm (h) × 5 cm (d)Nickel microtubes (liquid filled) 2–50 µm ID × 7 mm L2 µm3.1E-07b5 µm (depending on Δp)): at ± 20.7 kPa))2.2E-05b(16)
Gibney (no He leak determinations)Nickel microtubesBioaerosol test chambers of 8 cm (h) x 5 cm (d)Nickel microtubes(air filled) 2–50 µm ID × 7 mm L5 µm2.2E-05b7µm (at −34.5 kPa)ND(17)
Ravishankar et al.(no He leak determinations)Tungsten wire (withdrawn prior to challenge)Polymeric trays (335 mL)10–200 µm (6 mm L)NDND10–200 µmND(18)
Disk pinhole (plastic / steel)Polymeric trays (335 mL)5–50 µm (0.7 or 0.05 mm L)NDND5–30 µm4.3E-03c
  • Note: CCS = container closure system; FED = flow effective diameter; ND = not determined.

  • a Mid value of published range was chosen.

  • b He leak flow rate from authors used to provide an order for typical He flow rates for such artificial leaks (same dimensions with fused silica capilleries).

  • c Average He leak flow rate for steel disk in vial measured by outside-in method in this study (n = 25 results, span 0.99).