TABLE II

RO Water Quality in the Chamber of the WD

A. Microbiological & Chemical Quality

Chemical Disinfection Dilution rate & Disinfection timeSampling Before/After DisinfectionColony Counts (CFU/100mL)Endotoxin (EU/mL)pH*Water Hardness (ppm CaCO3)Conductivity (μS/cm)*Chloride (mg/L)Iron (mg/L)Maintenance of Expendable Parts
R2A (20 or 30 °C, 7 days)SCDA (35 °C, 48 h)AC FilterROIE ResinsUFMFUV Lamp
2006 DecInstallation of washer-disinfector (WD) & reverse osmosis (RO) plant.
n.d. (not done)59n.d.8.77023.91.9<0.01
2007 Jann.d.2.5 × 103n.d.7.77022.52.6<0.01
2007 FebSignificant contamination of and replacement of the water storage tank. Installation of additional filters and UV treatment lamps.
n.d.2.3 × 103n.d.9.45018.81.3<0.01
Significant contamination persisted in the WD chamber. RO water manufacturer offered to disinfect the whole water system using peracetic acid (PAA)-based compound.
2008 AugWhole system disinfection started twice a year from August 2008 after the material compatibility of PAA-based compound was confirmed in the WD.
1:200, 1 hBeforen.d.6.0 × 103n.d.7.3108.65n.d.n.d.
Aftern.d. (30 °C from 2009 Mar)188n.d.6.5007.4n.d.n.d.
2009 MarWater engineer failed to evaluate chemical water quality before disinfection.
1:200, 1 hBefore2.9 × 10331.121n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
After2100.6857.8009.8n.d.n.d.
2009 Jul1:66, 2 hBefore1.1 × 10400.3156.40011.00.6<0.01
After1.3 × 10301.0606.8001.00.5<0.01
2010 Feb1:200, 2 hBefore49000.1807.7401.80.6<0.01
After21700.3277.4601.330.6<0.01
2010 Aug1:200, 2 hBeforen.d.00.4236.9003.90.5<0.01
Aftern.d.00.3646.9501.10.2<0.01
2011 MarNew water engineer took over the duty from his predecessor in March 2011, and numerous operator errors occurred in the system maintenance. (20 °C from Mar 2011)
1:200, 2 hBefore88600.1708.30054.71.1<0.01
After2100.2207.13010.150.7<0.01
2011 Jul1:200, 2 hBefore1.9 × 10300.2826.5809.350.2<0.01
After252150.1707.0208.520.5<0.01
2012 Mar1:100, 2 hBefore5600.2686.5709.340.6<0.01
After4700.1997.1009.70.6<0.01
2012 Jul1:200, 2 hBefore1.1 × 10300.3247.05020.01.2<0.01
The microfilter (MF) was replaced with a new one to prevent bacterial contamination arising from the contaminaed filter.
After57000.1166.1009.560.8<0.01
  • The values in bold failed to satisfy AMMI TIR34:2007.

  • * Temperature correction was performed at 25 °C. AC, activated charcoal; RO, reverse osmosis; IE, ion exchange; UF, ultrafilter; MF, microfilter; UV, ultraviolet.