Abstract
The established cell line derived many years ago from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO cells) has been studied for the extent of chromosomal variation. Because this cell line is used extensively for genetic studies, the contribution of chromosome variability to genetic variability has also been examined. The quasidiploid CHO cells were found to have a banded karyotype somewhat altered from that of the Chinese hamster from which the line was derived. However, most of the genome could be accounted for among the rearranged marker chromosomes. In addition, the CHO line was found to have a relatively stable karyotype, the same basic karyotype being found in a majority of the uncloned cells, as well as in most cells of several but not all independent clones. Many, but not all, mutant cell lines derived from CHO also showed the same basic karyotype. Quasitetraploid cells, derived either spontaneously or by Sendai-virus-induced fusion, showed considerably more variation resulting in loss or gain of whole chromosomes, rearrangement of chromosomes, and appearance of new “marker” chromosomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Kramer, P.M., Deaven, L.L., Crissman, H.A., Steinkamp, J.A., and Petersen, D.F. (1973).Cold Spr. Har. Symp. Quant. Biol. 38:133–144.
Hashmi, S., Allderdice, P.W., Klein, G., and Miller, O.J. (1974).Cancer Res. 34:79–88.
Miller, O.J., Miller, D.A., Allderdice, P.W., Dev, V.G., and Grewal, M.S. (1971).Cytogenetics 10:338–346.
LoCurto, F., Scappaticci, S., and Fraccaro, M. (1972).Cytogenetics 11:305–312.
Lin, C.C., Chang, T.D., and Niewczas-Late, V. (1971).Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 13:9–13.
Gee, P.A., Ray, M., Mohandas, T., Douglas, G.R., Palser, H.R., Richardson, B.J., and Hamerton, J.L. (1974).Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 13:437–447.
Farber, R.A., and Liskay, R.M. (1974).Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 13:384–396.
Tjio, J.H., and Puck, T.T. (1958).J. Exp. Med. 108:259–271.
Deaven, L.L., and Petersen, D.F. (1973).Chromosoma 41:129–144.
Thompson, L.H., and Baker, R.M. (1973). InMethods in Cell Biology. D.M. Prescott (ed.), vol.6. Academic Press, New York, pp. 209–281.
Kao, F.T., and Puck, T.T. (1967).Genetics 55:513–524.
Baker, R.M., Brunette, D.M., Mankovitz, R., Thompson, L.H., Whitmore, G.F., Siminovitch, L., and Till, J.E. (1974).Cell:1:1–21.
McBurney, M.W., and Whitmore, G.F. (1975).Cell 2:173–182.
Ness, D. (1974).Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
Thompson, L.H., Harkins, J., and Stanners, C.P. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3094–3098.
Stanners, C.P., Elicieri, G.L., and Green, H. (1971).Nature New Biol. 230:52–54.
Seabright, M. (1971).Lancet 2:971–972.
Stubblefield, E. (1974). InThe Cell Nucleus. Harris Busch (ed.), vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, pp. 149–162.
Jones, G.E, and Sargent, P.A. (1975).Cell 2:43–54.
Ford, D.K., and Yerganian, G. (1958).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 21:393–425.
Kao, F.T., and Puck, T.T. (1969).J. Cell Physiol. 74:245–258.
Siminovitch, L. (1976).Cell 7:1–11.
Tertzi, M. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:5027–5031.
Zakharov, A.F., Kakpakova, E.S., Egolina, N.A., and Pogosianz, H. (1964).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 33:935–956.
Chasin, L.A., and Urlaub, G. (1975).Science 187:1091–1093.
Chasin, L.A. (1972).Nature New Biol. 240:50–52.
Tertzi, M., and Hawkins, T.S.C. (1975).Nature 253:361–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worton, R.G., Ho, C.C. & Duff, C. Chromosome stability in CHO cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 3, 27–45 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01550985
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01550985