Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
OtherConference Proceeding

Current Testing Methods and Challenges for Detection of Adventitious Viruses

Arifa S. Khan
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology November 2011, 65 (6) 627-633; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00831
Arifa S. Khan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Arifa.Khan@fda.hhs.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING Proceedings of the PDA/FDA Adventitious Viruses in Biologics: Detection and Mitigation Strategies Workshop in Bethesda, MD, USA; December 1–3, 2010

Guest Editors: Arifa Khan (Bethesda, MD), Patricia Hughes (Bethesda, MD) and Michael Wiebe (San Francisco, CA)

Adventitious viruses are a major safety concern in biological products. This paper discusses various sources of virus contamination and approaches to develop a comprehensive detection and mitigation strategy for product safety. Additionally, general safety concerns related to adventitious agents in biologics and current testing recommendations by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research for demonstrating the absence of adventitious agents in viral vaccines will be presented. The limitations of the conventional assays and the need for and consideration of new technologies for broad detection of novel agents will also be discussed.

  • Adventitious agents
  • Virus detection assays
  • Viral vaccines
  • Cell substrates
  • Biological products
  • Product safety

Introduction

Adventitious viruses are a major safety concern for a variety of products in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), this includes vaccines and allergenic extracts regulated by the Office of Vaccines Research and Review; somatic cell and gene therapy products, tissue and tissue-based products, xenotransplantation products, and tumor vaccines and immunotherapy products regulated by the Office of Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy; and whole blood, blood components, blood derivatives, and blood substitutes as well as antivenoms, immune globulins, and immune Fabs regulated by the Office of Blood Research and Review. Adventitious viruses are also an important safety concern in products regulated by other Centers such as recombinant proteins (monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, growth factors, enzymes, and hormones) and naturally-derived protein products (for example urokinase, pancreatic enzyme products, and hyaluronidase) regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; collagen, implants, and growth factors (e.g., bone morphogenetic proteins) regulated by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health; foods regulated by the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition; and animal drugs and animal feed additives regulated by the Center for Veterinary Medicine. For all products, rigorous efforts are made to identify the potential sources of virus contamination and to implement strategies for reducing the risk of virus introduction during product manufacture.

Biological products can be grouped into two general categories based upon manufacturing conditions as regards viral inactivation: non-inactivated products, which are minimally-moderately purified and can include complex biological products such as live attenuated and viral-vector vaccines and gene therapy vector products; and inactivated products, which are moderate-highly purified and can include well-characterized biotechnologically-derived products such as recombinant proteins and therapeutic antibodies. It should be noted that although general recommendations and guidances are published for adventitious agent testing of biological products, product-specific and regulatory guidance should be sought from the relevant Office/Center based upon the product and the intended clinical use.

Sources of Adventitious Virus Contamination and Mitigation Strategies

There are various sources of adventitious virus contamination in biologics (1): (a) the source materials (such as virus seed, cell substrate, or biological raw materials for cell culture, e.g., serum and trypsin) may contain naturally occurring exogenous or endogenous viruses or may have become infected with viruses if the donor species was naturally exposed to infectious agents or possibly from animal vaccines; (b) viruses may be acquired during cell culture passage by cross-contamination from infectious materials in the laboratory or other cell production facilities, environment, or by use of nonqualified animal-derived raw materials, as well as arise de novo by recombination; and (c) potential introduction of viruses can also occur during product manufacture due to handling, equipment, or environmental exposure, and due to possible activation of endogenous retroviruses or reactivation of latent DNA viruses by manufacturing conditions and reagents used to enhance product yield.

A comprehensive detection and mitigation strategy for product safety can consist of a three-prong approach aimed at (a) minimizing the risk of introduction of virus contamination in the starting materials for production, (b) assessing the potential for introduction of virus contaminants during product manufacture, and (c) maximizing virus clearance by including steps for effective inactivation and/or removal of any contaminating viruses.

The risk of virus contamination in the upstream processes may be reduced by use of qualified critical biological raw materials. This can be done by extensive testing of the biological starting materials such as cell substrates, vaccine virus seeds, vector virus preparations, donors/tissues, and others for known and unknown agents and by use of certified/tested animal-derived biological materials required for cell growth, differentiation, and selection (e.g., serum, trypsin, antibodies, media/media components, and growth factors).

Evaluation for virus contamination during manufacturing by developing a comprehensive plan for in-process testing of known and novel viruses may provide assurance to a great extent for demonstrating the absence of adventitious viruses in bulk/production lots.

The risk of virus contamination in downstream manufacturing can be mitigated by designing efficient validated processes to (1) reduce potential adventitious virus load, (2) inactivate potentially contaminating viruses in the final product, and (3) demonstrate reduction of residual cell substrate materials.

Detection of Adventitious Viruses

Testing for virus contamination is critical for demonstrating product safety. This is particularly important for novel cell substrates, which may contain unexpected and unindentified agents, and for demonstrating the safety of non-inactivated products, since there are no virus inactivation and removal steps in their manufacturing. Regulatory authorities generally recommend extensive adventitious agent testing at different stages of the manufacturing process targeting steps of potential introduction of virus contamination, and using various sensitive and broad detection assays (2–13). The routine tests for adventitious viruses currently recommended by CBER are detailed in Table I, and examples of some of the viruses detected in the different assays are indicated in Table II. These include general and specific virus detection assays for testing different virus families. However, the use of novel cell substrates and new technologies for product development, and discoveries of previously unknown viruses pose challenges for these conventional assays (Tables III and IV). Therefore, additional tests may be recommended to demonstrate the safety of novel cell substrates (14). These include chemical induction assays using drugs with different mechanisms of virus activation to evaluate latent and occult viruses in novel cell substrates (15, 16) and in vivo oncogenicity assays to evaluate oncogenic viruses in tumorigenic cell substrates. Some general features of these assays are described in Table V. Recently, new, sequence-based technologies have emerged for broad virus detection (17–21). The methods used to discover novel viruses and sequences of previously unknown viruses—massively parallel or deep sequencing, virus microarrays, or long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with mass spectrometry—warrant further consideration and evaluation for their applicability to the testing of biological products (Table VI).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE I

Routine Tests for Adventitious Viruses

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE II

Viruses Detected by Different Test Methods

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE III

Advantages and Limitations of Conventional Assays for Virus Detection

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE IV

Challenges for Current Assays for Adventitious Virus Detection

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE V

Additional Assays for Adventitious Virus Testing of Novel Cell Substrates

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE VI

Some Considerations for Introducing New Virus Detection Technologies

Conflict of Interest Declaration

The author declares no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

I thank Andrew Lewis and Amy Rosenberg for review of the paper.

  • © PDA, Inc. 2011

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Khan A. S.
    Regulatory considerations for raw materials used in biological products. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2010, 64 (5), 451–457.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Points to consider in the characterization of cell lines used to produce biologicals. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Rockville, MD, July 1993.
  3. 3.↵
    CBER. Points to consider in the manufacture and testing of therapeutic products for human use derived from transgenic animals. U.S. FDA: Rockville, MD, January 1995.
  4. 4.↵
    CBER. Points to consider in the manufacture and testing of monoclonal antibody products for human use. U.S. FDA: Rockville, MD, February 1997.
  5. 5.↵
    CBER. Guidance for industry: Source animal, product, preclinical, and clinical issues concerning the use of xenotransplantation products in humans. U.S. FDA: Rockville, MD, April 2003.
  6. 6.↵
    CBER. Guidance for industry: Supplemental guidance on testing for replication competent retrovirus in retroviral vector based gene therapy products and during follow-up of patients in clinical trials using retroviral vectors. U.S. FDA: Rockville, MD, November 2006.
  7. 7.↵
    Code of Federal Regulations, Title 9, Animal and Animal Products (current year): Part 113.53, Requirements for ingredients of animal origin used for production of biologics. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington DC. January 1, 2011.
  8. 8.↵
    CBER. Guidance for industry: Characterization and qualification of cell substrates and other biological materials used in the production of viral vaccines for infectious disease indications. U.S. FDA: Rockville, MD, Rockville, MD; February 2010.
  9. 9.↵
    Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 610. Food and Drugs, General Biological Products Standards. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, April 1, 2009.
  10. 10.↵
    International Conference on Harmonization. ICH Topics Q5D—Guidance on derivation and characterization of cell substrates used for production of biotechnological/biological products. 21 Sept 1998.
  11. 11.↵
    International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH Topics Q5A(R1)—Viral safety evaluation of biotechnology products derived from cell lines of human or animal origin. 23 Sept 1999.
  12. 12.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization, 47th Report: Requirements for the use of animal cells as in vitro substrates for the production of biologicals. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 878, Annex 1, 1998.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Khan A. S.
    Characterization and qualification of cell substrates for manufacturing viral vaccines in the United States. BioProcessing J. 2009, 8 (3), 8–12.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Khan A. S.
    Testing considerations for novel cell substrates: a regulatory perspective. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2010, 64 (5), 426–431.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ma H.,
    2. Ma Y.,
    3. Ma W.,
    4. Williams D. K.,
    5. Galvin T. A.,
    6. Khan A. S.
    Chemical induction of endogenous retrovirus particles from the Vero cell line of African green monkeys. J. Virol. 2011, 85 (13), 6579–6588.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ma W.,
    2. Galvin T. A.,
    3. Ma H.,
    4. Muller J.,
    5. Khan A. S.
    Optimization of chemical induction conditions for human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) reactivation with 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) from latently-infected BC-3 cells. Biologicals 2011, 39 (3), 158–166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Onions D.,
    2. Côté C.,
    3. Love B.,
    4. Toms B.,
    5. Koduri S.,
    6. Armstrong A.,
    7. Chang A.,
    8. Kolman J.
    Ensuring the safety of vaccine cell substrates by massively parallel sequencing of the transcriptome. Vaccine 2011 Jun 7 [Epub ahead of print].
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ecker D. J.,
    2. Sampath R.,
    3. Massire C.,
    4. Blyn L. B.,
    5. Hall T. A.,
    6. Eshoo M. W.,
    7. Hofstadler S. A.
    Ibis T5000: a universal biosensor approach for microbiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6 (7), 553–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tang P.,
    2. Chen C.
    Metagenomics for the discovery of novel human viruses. Future Microbiol. 2010, 5 (2), 177–189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gardner S. N.,
    2. Jaing C. J.,
    3. McLoughlin K. S.,
    4. Slezak T. R.
    A microbial detection array (MDA) for viral and bacterial detection. BMC Genomics 2010, 11 (1), 668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Onions D.,
    2. Kolman J.
    Massively parallel sequencing, a new method for detecting adventitious agents. Biologicals 2010, 38 (3), 377–380.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 65 (6)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 65, Issue 6
November/December 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Current Testing Methods and Challenges for Detection of Adventitious Viruses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Current Testing Methods and Challenges for Detection of Adventitious Viruses
Arifa S. Khan
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Nov 2011, 65 (6) 627-633; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00831

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Current Testing Methods and Challenges for Detection of Adventitious Viruses
Arifa S. Khan
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Nov 2011, 65 (6) 627-633; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00831
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Sources of Adventitious Virus Contamination and Mitigation Strategies
    • Detection of Adventitious Viruses
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Performance of High-Throughput Sequencing for Virus Detection
  • New Technologies and Challenges of Novel Virus Detection
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Conference Proceeding

  • Proceedings of the 2017 Viral Clearance Symposium, Session 3: Resin Lifetime
  • Proceedings of the 2017 Viral Clearance Symposium, Session 1.1: Upstream Mitigation, Part 1—Cell Bank and Bulk Harvest Testing
  • Proceedings of the 2017 Viral Clearance Symposium, Session 6: Ensuring Viral Safety in Continuous Processing
Show more Conference Proceeding

Plenary Session 5: Viral Testing: Existing Assays and Emerging Technologies

  • Overview of Emerging Technologies To Detect Adventitious Agents
  • Theory and Practice of Conventional Adventitious Virus Testing
Show more Plenary Session 5: Viral Testing: Existing Assays and Emerging Technologies

Paper

  • Overview of Emerging Technologies To Detect Adventitious Agents
  • Theory and Practice of Conventional Adventitious Virus Testing
  • Adventitious Agents: Issues and Considerations during Pre-Approval Reviews and Inspections
Show more Paper

Similar Articles

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire