Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleTechnology/Application

How Risky Are Pinholes in Gloves? A Rational Appeal for the Integrity of Gloves for Isolators

Angela Gessler, Alexandra Stärk, Volker Sigwarth and Claude Moirandat
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology May 2011, 65 (3) 227-241; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00716
Angela Gessler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: angela.gessler@skan.ch
Alexandra Stärk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Volker Sigwarth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claude Moirandat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Isolators provide a high degree of protection for the product and/or the environment and operators in pharmaceutical production, as well as for analytical and sterility testing. Gloves allow for performing testing and for easy access to the process. Due to their nature—thin plastic, highly flexible—and their risk of puncture or rupture, they are regarded as one of the main potential sources of contamination. Glove integrity testing is therefore a main issue and has been addressed by many regulations such as those imposed by the USP, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention.

This paper presents a short overview of different glove integrity test procedures and their ability to detect leaking gloves. Additionally, extensive microbiological tests have been performed to give more evidence and cross-correlation to physical testing. Most of the physical tests have limitations either in detecting pinholes and/or they are difficult to implement for routine testing. Microbiological tests are only applicable for evaluation and validation purposes, but not for routine testing, because they are time-consuming and do not allow immediate action. Routine visual verification of gloves by trained personnel turns out to be a very reliable technique.

Additional microbiological tests supported by microbiological environmental monitoring helped to develop a new concept presented here on how to handle gloves with pinholes. It is proposed not to automatically consider a pinhole in a glove as a breach in isolator integrity, but to consider any action in view of controlling and monitoring the effective bioload on the outside of the gloves. With the combination of semi-automatic physical testing with independent protocol, visual inspection, and control of bioload through microbiological environmental monitoring potential contamination, risks can be minimized and maximum safety maintained.

LAY ABSTRACT: Isolators are enclosure designs to protect critical handling and process steps in pharmaceutical environments. They provide a high degree of protection for product and/or environment and operators against particles, potentially hazardous active principles, and microbial load.

Gloves mounted on windows and doors of the isolator allow for manipulation, performing testing, and access to the process. Due to their nature and their use with risk of puncture or rupture, they are regarded as a potential source for contamination. Glove integrity testing has therefor been addressed by regulations such as those imposed by the USP and the Food and Drug Administration.

This paper presents a short overview of various glove integrity test procedures and their ability to detect leaking gloves. Most of the tests have limitations either in detecting pinholes and/or they are difficult to implement for routine testing. Routine visual verification of gloves by trained personnel turns out to be a very reliable technique.

Additional microbiological tests led to a new concept presented here on how to handle gloves with pinholes and how to take action. With this approach, risks can be minimized and maximum safety maintained by controlling and monitoring the effective bioload on the outside of the gloves.

  • Isolator
  • Gloves
  • Glove integrity testing
  • Visual inspection
  • Pinholes
  • Growth-through
  • Bioload
  • © PDA, Inc. 2011
View Full Text

PDA members receive access to all articles published in the current year and previous volume year. Institutional subscribers received access to all content. Log in below to receive access to this article if you are either of these.  

If you are neither or you are a PDA member trying to access an article outside of your membership license, then you must purchase access to this article (below). If you do not have a username or password for JPST, you will be required to create an account prior to purchasing. 

Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only.

Note to pda.org users

The PDA and PDA bookstore websites (www.pda.org and www.pda.org/bookstore) are separate websites from the PDA JPST website. When you first join PDA, your initial UserID and Password are sent to HighWirePress to create your PDA JPST account. Subsequent UserrID and Password changes required at the PDA websites will not pass on to PDA JPST and vice versa. If you forget your PDA JPST UserID and/or Password, you can request help to retrieve UserID and reset Password below.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles

Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only. You can join PDA at www.pda.org. 

PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 65 (3)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 65, Issue 3
May/June 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Risky Are Pinholes in Gloves? A Rational Appeal for the Integrity of Gloves for Isolators
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
How Risky Are Pinholes in Gloves? A Rational Appeal for the Integrity of Gloves for Isolators
Angela Gessler, Alexandra Stärk, Volker Sigwarth, Claude Moirandat
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology May 2011, 65 (3) 227-241; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00716

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How Risky Are Pinholes in Gloves? A Rational Appeal for the Integrity of Gloves for Isolators
Angela Gessler, Alexandra Stärk, Volker Sigwarth, Claude Moirandat
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology May 2011, 65 (3) 227-241; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00716
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Summary of Results
    • Microbiological Tests: Growth Through Pinholes
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Microbial Contamination and Isolator Gloves: If It All Came Down to the Size of a Hole?
  • Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part A: risk assessment
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Mechanical Container Closure Integrity Test: A Method for Cartridge Systems
  • A Container Closure Integrity Test Method for Vials Stored at Cryogenic Conditions Using Headspace Oxygen Analysis
  • Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations
Show more Technology/Application

Similar Articles

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire