Abstract
It is obvious that, in the media fill test and process simulation test, positive numbers in total fills should not have any significant difference from zero or asepsis. There are many reports concerning the definition of “sterility” or “asepsis.” However, any scientific and practical methods to demonstrate “no significant difference from zero” have not been reported up to now. The existing criteria, such as “less than 0.1%,” “less than 0.05%,” and “less than two positives” are not appropriate to assure the integrity of processes, and sometimes lead to erroneous results. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate novel, reasonable and practical methods and criteria based on scientific and statistical consideration.
According to the ISO 13408-1 Aseptic Processing of Health Care Products, Part 1 (1998), General Requirement for Aseptic Processing, the action level for the number of positive units in media fill tests is specified as 0.1%, and the alert level is 0.05%. In this paper it is shown that the existing ISO standard and other official methods are inappropriate in that zero contaminated units (sterile product) is outside the confidence range of probable distribution of contaminated units, even though the contaminated units are less than 0.1% in larger numbers of fills, and even less than 0.05%. This indicates that the limit of 0.1% or 0.05% is inappropriate in cases of larger numbers of fills. For sterile products, the number of contaminated units other than “zero” at the statistical confidence range must be judged to be contaminated units in process and as non-sterile. In order to harmonize this criteria—“no significant difference from zero”—with the existing criteria, the new criteria may be combined with only the existing criteria of 0.05% in smaller number of fills.
- Process Simulation Test
- Media Fill Test
- Sterility Assurance
- Acceptance Probability
- Aseptic Processing
- Action Level
- Alert Level
Footnotes
- Copyright © Parenteral Drug Association. All rights reserved.
PDA members receive access to all articles published in the current year and previous volume year. Institutional subscribers received access to all content. Log in below to receive access to this article if you are either of these.
If you are neither or you are a PDA member trying to access an article outside of your membership license, then you must purchase access to this article (below). If you do not have a username or password for JPST, you will be required to create an account prior to purchasing.
Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only.
Note to pda.org users
The PDA and PDA bookstore websites (www.pda.org and www.pda.org/bookstore) are separate websites from the PDA JPST website. When you first join PDA, your initial UserID and Password are sent to HighWirePress to create your PDA JPST account. Subsequent UserrID and Password changes required at the PDA websites will not pass on to PDA JPST and vice versa. If you forget your PDA JPST UserID and/or Password, you can request help to retrieve UserID and reset Password below.
