Evaluation of the ScanRDI® as a Rapid Alternative to the Pharmacopoeial Sterility Test Method: Comparison of the Limits of Detection

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Moldenhauer J.,
   2. Sutton S. W.

   Towards an improved sterility test. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2004, 58 (6), 284–286.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Halvorsen H. O.,
   2. Ziegler N. R.

   Application of statistics in bacteriology, I. A means of determining bacterial populations by the dilution method. J. Bacteriol. 1932, 25, 101–121.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Sun X.,
   2. Kurosu S.,
   3. Shintani H.

   The expanded application of the most probable number to the quantitative evaluation of extremely low microbial count. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2006, 60 (2), 124–134.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kepner .L. Jr.,
   2. Pratt. J. R.

   The use of fluorochromes for the direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples: past and present. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 58 (4), 603–615.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Baudart J.,
   2. Coallier J.,
   3. Laurent P.,
   4. Prévost M.

   Rapid and sensitive enumeration of viable diluted cells of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae in freshwater and drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68 (10), 5057–5063.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Jones D.,
   2. Brailsford M. A.,
   3. Drocourt J.-L.

   Solid-phase laser scanning cytometry: a new two-hour method for the enumeration of microorganisms in pharmaceutical water. Pharmacopoeial Forum 1999, 25 (1), 7626–7645.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Onadipe A.,
   2. Ulvedal K.

   A method for the rapid detection of microbial contaminants in animal cell culture processes. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 337–345.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.
   1. Ramond B.,
   2. Rolland X.,
   3. Planchez C.,
   4. Cornet P.,
   5. Antoni C.,
   6. Drocourt J.-L.

   Enumeration of total viable microorganisms in antibiotic raw material using ChemScan® solid phase cytometer. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2000, 54 (4), 320–331.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   USP 71 Sterility Tests. In United States Pharmacopeia, 31st Rev.; U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.: Rockville, MD, 2008.
10. 10.↵
    EP 2.6.1 Sterility. In European Pharmacopoeia, 6th ed.; European Department for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare: Strasbourg, France, 2008.
11. 11.↵
    Sterility Test. In Japanese Pharmacopoeia. 15th ed.; Society of Japanese Pharmacopoeia: Tokyo, Japan, 2006; p 93.
12. 12.↵
    1. Jackson G. J.,
    2. Merker R. I.,
    3. Bandler R.

    1. Blodgett R.

    Most Probable Number Determination from Serial Dilutions. In Bacteriological Analytical Manual; Jackson G. J., Merker R. I., Bandler R. BAM Project Coordinators. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/Food/ScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/BacteriologicalAnalyticalManualBAM/default.htm.
13. 13.↵
    USP 1223 Validation of Alternative Microbiological Methods. In United States Pharmacopeia, 31st Rev.; U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.: Rockville, MD, 2008.
14. 14.↵
    1. Jennison C.,
    2. Turnbull B. W.

    Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, 2000; p 416.
15. 15.↵
    SAS/STAT software, SAS System for Windows version 9.1.3.; SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC, 2001–2002.
16. 16.↵
    EP 2.6.12 Microbial Examination of Nonsterile Products: Total Viable Aerobic Count. In European Pharmacopoeia, 6th ed.; European Department for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare: Strasbourg, France, 2008.
17. 17.↵
    1. Moldenhauer J.

    Viability-based rapid microbiological methods for sterility testing and the need for identification of contamination. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2006, 60 (2), 81–88.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text