Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters—Part I

I. Kaesler, G. Haake, H. Hennig, A. Rosenhagen, T. H. Meltzer and M. W. Jornitz
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology March 2011, 65 (2) 92-99;
I. Kaesler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ines.kaesler@sartorius-stedim.com
G. Haake
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Hennig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Rosenhagen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. H. Meltzer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. W. Jornitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard F838-05, Standard Test Method for Determining Bacterial Retention of Membrane Filters Utilized for Liquid Filtration; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.
  2. 2.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: sterile drug products produced by aseptic processing; Center for Drugs and Biologics and Office of Regulatory Affairs; Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, 2004.
  3. 3.↵
    Sterilizing filtration of liquids. Technical report no. 26. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2008, 52 (S1).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sundaram S.,
    2. Auriemma M.,
    3. Howard G. Jr..,
    4. Brandwein H.,
    5. Leo F.
    An application of membrane filtration for removal of diminutive bioburden organisms in pharma products and processes. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 1999, 53 (4), 186–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sundaram S.,
    2. Eisenhuth J.,
    3. Howard G. Jr..,
    4. Brandwein H.
    Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 346–372.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sundaram S.,
    2. Eisenhuth J.,
    3. Steves M.,
    4. Howard G. Jr..,
    5. Brandwein H.
    Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 373–392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sundaram S.,
    2. Eisenhuth J.,
    3. Lewis M.,
    4. Howard G. H. Jr..,
    5. Brandwein H.
    Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 393–416.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sundaram S.,
    2. Lewis M.,
    3. Eisenhuth J.,
    4. Howard G. Jr..,
    5. Larson B.
    Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part IV: retention of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) and Ralstonia pickettii (700591) by 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2002, 56 (3), 150–171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lee A.,
    2. Hussong D.,
    3. Brorson K.
    Filter retention studies with Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava. PDA/FDA Conference, Washington, DC, 2008.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lee A.,
    2. McVey J.,
    3. Faustino S.,
    4. Lute S.,
    5. Sweeney N.,
    6. Pawar V.,
    7. Khan M.,
    8. Brorson K.,
    9. Hussong D.
    Use of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava penetration to quantitatively assess the impact of filtration parameters for 0.2-micrometer-pore-size filters. App. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76 (3), 695–700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Benson D. A.,
    2. Karsch-Mizrachi I.,
    3. Lipman D. J.,
    4. Ostell J.,
    5. Wheeler D. L.
    GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Database issue), D25–D30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ludwig W.,
    2. Strunk O.,
    3. Westram R.,
    4. Richter L.,
    5. Meier H.,
    6. Yadhukumar,
    7. Buchner A.,
    8. Lai T.,
    9. Steppi S.,
    10. Jobb G.,
    11. Förster W.,
    12. Brettske I.,
    13. Gerber S.,
    14. Ginhart A. W.,
    15. Gross O.,
    16. Grumann S.,
    17. Hermann S.,
    18. Jost R.,
    19. König A.,
    20. Liss T.,
    21. Lümann R.,
    22. May M.,
    23. Nonhoff B.,
    24. Reichel B.,
    25. Strehlow R.,
    26. Stamatakis A.,
    27. Stuckmann N.,
    28. Vilbig A.,
    29. Lenke M.,
    30. Ludwig T.,
    31. Bode A.,
    32. Schleifer K.-H.
    ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (4), 1363–1371.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pruesse E.,
    2. Quast C.,
    3. Knittel K.,
    4. Fuchs B.,
    5. Ludwig W.,
    6. Peplies J.,
    7. Glöckner F. O.
    SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35 (21), 7188–7196.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Madsen R. E.,
    2. Akers J. E.,
    3. Jornitz M. W.,
    4. Meltzer T. H.
    The use of model organisms in sterilizing filtration. Pharm. Technol. 2006, Supplement, s38–s42.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ridgway H. F.,
    2. Rigby M. G.,
    3. Argo D. G.
    Adhesion of a mycobacterium sp. to cellulose diacetate membranes used in reverse osmosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47 (1), 61–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tolliver D. L.,
    2. Schroeder H. G.
    Particle control in semiconductor process streams. Microcontamination 1983, l (l), 34–43, 78.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Meltzer T. H.,
    2. Jornitz M. W.
    Eds. Chapter 21 Mechanism of Particle Retention. Pharmaceutical Filtration: The Management of Organism Retention; PDA/DHI Publishers: Bethesda, MD, 2006.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mittelman M. W.,
    2. Kawamura K.,
    3. Jornitz M. W.,
    4. Meltzer T. H.
    Filter validation: bacterial hydrophobicity, adsorptive sequestration and cell size alteration. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 422–428.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Validation of microbial retention of sterilizing filters. PDA/FDA Special Scientific Forum, Bethesda, MD, 1995.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Leahy T. J.,
    2. Sullivan M. J.
    Validation of bacterial retention capabilities of membrane filters. Pharm. Technol. 1978, 2 (11), 64–75.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ding L.,
    2. Yokota A.
    Proposals of Curvibacter gracilis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Herbaspirillum putei sp. nov. for bacterial strains isolated from well water and reclassification of [Pseudomonas] huttiensis, [Pseudomonas] lanceolata, [Aquaspirillum] delicatum and [Aquaspirillum] autotrophicum as Herbaspirillum huttiense comb. nov., Curvibacter lanceolatus comb. nov., Curvibacter delicatus comb. nov., and Herbaspirillum autotrophicum comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54 (Pt. 6), 2223–2230.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Leifson E.
    The bacterial flora of distilled and stored water. III. New species of the genera Corynebacterium, Flavobacterium, Spirillum and Pseudomonas. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon. 1962, 12, 161–170.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.
    1. Hylemon P. B.,
    2. Wells J. S. Jr..,
    3. Krieg N. R.,
    4. Jannasch H.
    W. The genus Spirillum: a taxonomic study. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1973, 23, 340–380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    1. Garrity G.
    1. Vancanneyt M.,
    2. Segers P.,
    3. Abraham W.,
    4. De Vos P.
    Brevundimonas. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Garrity G. Ed.; Springer: New York, 2009; Vol. 2, Part C, pp 308–316.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    1. Garrity G.
    1. Willems A.,
    2. Gillis M.
    Hydrogenophaga. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Garrity G. Ed.; Springer: New York, 2009; Vol. 2, Part C.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 65 (2)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 65, Issue 2
March/April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters—Part I
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters—Part I
I. Kaesler, G. Haake, H. Hennig, A. Rosenhagen, T. H. Meltzer, M. W. Jornitz
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2011, 65 (2) 92-99;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters—Part I
I. Kaesler, G. Haake, H. Hennig, A. Rosenhagen, T. H. Meltzer, M. W. Jornitz
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2011, 65 (2) 92-99;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • The Model Challenge Organism for 0.2 μm Rated Filters
    • Challenge Organism Choice and Determination
    • Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892
    • Summary
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Benchmarking of Sterilizing-Grade Filter Membranes with Liposome Filtration
  • The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters
  • Sterilizing Filtration of Liposome and Related Lipid-Containing Solutions: Enhancing Successful Filter Qualification
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Coring and Fragmentation of Elastomeric Needle Shield in a Pre-Filled Syringe
  • Worldwide Regulatory Reliance: Results of an Executed Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Post-Approval Change Pilot
  • Preservative Efficacy Testing of Refrigerated Pharmaceuticals: Choice of Challenging Isolate and Storage Temperature
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire