Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Simulation for Capacity Extension of High-Purity Water Delivery Systems

Frank Riedewald, Edmond Byrne and Kevin Cronin
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology July 2011, 65 (4) 404-424; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00751
Frank Riedewald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: frankriedewald@gmail.com
Edmond Byrne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Cronin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Download DI/WFI Stochastic Excel Simulation Spreadsheet. University College Cork, Department of Process & Chemical Engineering, http://www.ucc.ie/processeng/links/utility/stochastic">http://www.ucc.ie/processeng/links/utility/stochastic
  2. 2.↵
    1. Anonymous
    . Water and Steam Systems. 1st ed.; International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE): Tampa, 2001.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wu M.,
    2. Sun D.,
    3. Tay J. H.
    Development of a practical model for capacity evaluation of ultrapure water systems. Desalination. 2004, 161 (3),223– 233
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. McQueen D. H. O,
    2. Hyland P. R.,
    3. Watson S. J.
    Monte Carlo simulation of residential electricity demand for forecasting maximum demand on distribution networks. IEEE Trans. Power Sys. 2004, 19 (3),1685– 1689
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Virginia B. A.,
    2. Peters J. S.,
    3. Smith D. J. Medeiros,
    4. Rohrer M. W.
    1. Saraph P. V.
    In Biotech Industry: Simulation and Beyond, Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, (Arlington) Virginia B. A., Peters J. S., Smith D. J. Medeiros, Rohrer M. W. Eds.; IEEE Computer Society: Arlington, 2001; pp. 838– 843.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Perrone L. F.,
    2. Wieland F. P.,
    3. Liu J.,
    4. Lawson B. G.,
    5. Nicol D. M.,
    6. Fujimoto R. M.
    1. Alexander C. W.
    Discrete Event Simulation for Batch Processing. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference; Perrone L. F., Wieland F. P., Liu J., Lawson B. G., Nicol D. M., Fujimoto R. M. Eds.; IEEE: Arlington, VA, 2006; pp. 1929– 1934.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Perrone L. F.,
    2. Wieland F. P.,
    3. Liu J.,
    4. Lawson B. G.,
    5. Nicol D. M.,
    6. Fujimoto R. M.
    1. Sanchez P. J.
    As Simple as Possible, But No Simpler: A Gentle Introduction to Simulation Modeling. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Perrone L. F., Wieland F. P., Liu J., Lawson B. G., Nicol D. M., Fujimoto R. M. Eds.; IEEE: Arlington, VA, 2006; pp 2– 10.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Honkomp S. J.,
    2. Lombardo S.,
    3. Rosen O.,
    4. Pekny J. F.
    The curse of reality—why process scheduling optimization problems are difficult in practice. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24 (2–7) 323– 328
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Vieira G. E.,
    2. Herrmann J. W.,
    3. Lin E.
    Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies, and methods. J. Scheduling 2003, 6 (1),39– 62
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Drosg M.
    Dealing with Uncertainties: A Guide to Error Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2009.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Junker B. H.,
    2. Stanik M.,
    3. Adamca J.,
    4. LaRiviere K.,
    5. Abbatiello M.,
    6. Salmon P.
    An ambient water loop system for USP purified water. Bioprocess Eng. 1997, 17 (5),277– 286
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Evans M.,
    2. Hastings N.,
    3. Peacock B.
    Statistical Distributions, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1993.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sablani S. S.,
    2. Rahman M. S.,
    3. Datta A. K.,
    4. Mujumdar A. S.
    1. Cronin K.,
    2. Gleeson J. P.
    Monte Carlo Simulation. In Handbook of Food and Bioprocess Modeling Techniques, Sablani S. S., Rahman M. S., Datta A. K., Mujumdar A. S. Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2007.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Meltzer T. H.
    High-Purity Water Preparation: For the Semiconductor, Pharmaceutical, and Power Industries, 2nd ed.; Tall Oaks Publishing: Littleton, CO, 1997.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Martinez J. E.
    Hyperthermophilic microorganisms and USP hot water systems. Pharm. Technol. 2004, February, 50– 65.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Luyben M. L.,
    2. Luyben W. L.
    Essentials of Process Control; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1993.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Jerry Banks
    Editor. Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1998.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Law A. M.,
    2. Kelton D. M.
    Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Henderson S. G.,
    2. Biller B.,
    3. Hsieh M. H.,
    4. Shortle J.,
    5. Tew J. D.,
    6. Barton R. R.
    1. Sargent R. G.
    Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference; Henderson S. G., Biller B., Hsieh M. H., Shortle J., Tew J. D., Barton R. R. Eds.; IEEE: Arlington, 2007; pp 124– 137.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Greasley A.
    Enabling a Simulation Capability in the Organisation. Springer: London, 2008.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Hlupic V.
    Discrete-event simulation software: what the users want. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 1999, 73 (362),363– 370
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Pemberton J. D.,
    2. Robson A. J.
    Spreadsheets in business. Indus. Manag. Data Sys. 2000, 100 (8),379– 388
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Green J.,
    2. Bullen S.,
    3. Bovey R.,
    4. Alexander M.
    Excel 2007 VBA Programmers Reference. Wiley Publishing Inc.: Indianapolis, 2007.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Panko R. R.,
    2. Sprague R. H.
    Hitting the wall: errors in developing and code inspecting a simple spreadsheet model. Decision Support Systems 1998, 22 (4),337– 353
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Powell S. G.,
    2. Baker K. R.,
    3. Lawson B.
    Impact of errors in operational spreadsheets. Decision Support Systems 2009, 47 (2),126– 132
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Dijstra E. W.
    Notes on Structured Programming. Technological University Eindhoven, http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd02xx/EWD249.PDF (accessed April 4, 2011).
  27. 27.↵
    1. Anonymous
    . GNU Operating System. http://www.gnu.org/ (accessed February 27, 2010).
  28. 28.↵
    1. McCullough B. D.
    Microsoft Excel's not The Wichmann-Hill random number generator. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 2008, 52 (10),4587– 4593
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wichmann B. A.,
    2. Hill I. D.
    Algorithm AS 183: an efficient and portable pseudo random number generator. Appl. Statist. 1982, 31 (1),188– 190
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Steele A. G.,
    2. Douglas R. J.
    Simplifications from Simulations. NCSLI Workshop and Symposium; Washington, DC, August 7–11, 2006; Institute for National Measurements Standards, National Research Council of Canada, Eds.; http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/qde/montecarlo/choosedownloads.html (accessed April 11, 2011).
  31. 31.↵
    1. Yalta A. T.
    The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft® Excel 2007. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 2008, 52 (10),4579– 4586
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Knüsel L.
    On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 2003. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 2005, 48 (3),445– 449
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Pottel H.
    Statistical flaws in Excel. University of Coventry, http://www.coventry.ac.uk/ec/∼nhunt/pottel.pdf (accessed February 27, 2010).
  34. 34.↵
    1. Banks J.
    1. Musselman K. J.
    Guidelines for Success. In Handbook of Simulation, Banks J. Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
  35. 35.↵
    ASME BPE-2009. Bioprocessing Equipment; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, 2009.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 65 (4)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 65, Issue 4
July/August 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Simulation for Capacity Extension of High-Purity Water Delivery Systems
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Simulation for Capacity Extension of High-Purity Water Delivery Systems
Frank Riedewald, Edmond Byrne, Kevin Cronin
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jul 2011, 65 (4) 404-424; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00751

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Simulation for Capacity Extension of High-Purity Water Delivery Systems
Frank Riedewald, Edmond Byrne, Kevin Cronin
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jul 2011, 65 (4) 404-424; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2011.00751
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Nomenclature
    • Introduction
    • Mathematical Formulation of the Di/WFI Models
    • Materials and Methods
    • Illustrative Example
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Microorganism Profile Identified in Bioburden Analysis in a Biopharmaceutical Facility in Brazil: Criteria for Classification and Management of Results
  • Evaluation of Extreme Depyrogenation Conditions on the Surface Hydrolytic Resistance of Glass Containers for Pharmaceutical Use
  • A Holistic Approach for Filling Volume Variability Evaluation and Control with Statistical Tool
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire