The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters

References

1. 1.↵
   Sterilizing filtration of liquids. Technical report no. 26. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2008, 52 (S1).
2. 2.↵
   1. Sundaram S,
   2. Eisenhuth J,
   3. Howard G Jr.,
   4. Brandwein H

   . Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: Characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 346– 372.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Sundaram S,
   2. Eisenhuth J,
   3. Steves M,
   4. Howard G Jr.,
   5. Brantwein H

   . Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: Preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 373– 392.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Sundaram S,
   2. Eisenhuth J,
   3. Lewis M,
   4. Howard GH Jr.,
   5. Brantwein H

   . Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 393–416.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Sundaram S,
   2. Lewis M,
   3. Eisenhuth J,
   4. Howard G Jr.,
   5. Larson B

   . Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part IV: Retention of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) and Ralstonia pickettii (700591) by 0.2 and 0.22 μm rated filters. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2002, 56 (3), 150– 171.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Lee A,
   2. Hussong D,
   3. Brorson K

   . Filter Retention Studies with Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava. PDA/FDA Conference, Washington, DC, 2008.
7. 7.↵
   1. Lee A,
   2. McVey J,
   3. Faustino S,
   4. Lute S,
   5. Sweeney N,
   6. Pawar V,
   7. Khan M,
   8. Brorson K,
   9. Hussong D

   . Use of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava penetration to quantitatively assess the impact of filtration parameters for 0.2-micrometer-pore-size filters. App. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76 (3), 695–700.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Kaesler I,
   2. Haake G,
   3. Hennig H,
   4. Rosenhagen A,
   5. Jornitz MW,
   6. Meltzer TH

   . The importance of accurate microorganism identification in microbial challenge tests of membrane filters—Part I. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2011, 65 (2), 92–99.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard F838-05, Standard test method for determining bacterial retention of membrane filters utilized for liquid filtration; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.
10. 10.↵
    HIMA Document No. 3, Vol. 4, Microbiological evaluation of filters for sterilizing liquids, Health Industry Manufacturers Association, Washington, D.C., 1982.
11. 11.
    1. Garrity G

    1. Vancanneyt M,
    2. Segers P,
    3. Abraham W,
    4. De Vos P

    . Brevundimonas. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Garrity G Ed.; Springer: New York, 2009; Vol. 2, Part C, pp 308–316.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.
    1. Garrity G

    1. Willems A,
    2. Gillis M

    . Hydrogenophaga. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Garrity G Ed.; Springer: New York, 2009; Vol. 2, Part C, pp 710–716.

    OpenUrl