Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry—A Systematic Review of the Literature

Nader Shafiei, James L. Ford, Charles W. Morecroft, Paulo J. Lisboa, Mark J. Taylor and Yusra Mouzughi
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology March 2013, 67 (2) 105-122; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00904
Nader Shafiei
1School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: N.Shafiei@2009.ljmu.ac.uk
James L. Ford
1School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles W. Morecroft
1School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paulo J. Lisboa
2School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Liverpool, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J. Taylor
2School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Liverpool, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yusra Mouzughi
3Liverpool Business School, Liverpool, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cockburn I. M.
    Is the pharmaceutical industry in a productivity crisis? Innovation Policy and the Economy 2006, 7, 1–32.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cohen J.,
    2. Gangi Q.,
    3. Lineen J.,
    4. Manard A.
    Strategic alternatives in the pharmaceutical industry. Managerial challenges in the Pharmaceutical, Biotech, and Medical Device Industries; Kellogg School of Management: Evanston, IL, 2004.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ahlborn H.,
    2. Henderson S.,
    3. Davies N.
    No immediate pain relief for the pharmaceutical industry. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2005, 8 (3), 384–391.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Peck J. C.,
    2. Crooks G.,
    3. McQuade A.
    Pharma 2029: Pharma's Future Today; Institute for Alternative Futures: Alexandria, VA, 2007.
  5. 5.↵
    Deloitte white paper. The Future of the Life Sciences Industries: Transformation amid Rising Risk; Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu: New York, 2009.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Grabowski H.,
    2. Kyle M.
    Mergers and Alliances in Pharmaceuticals: Effects on Innovation and R&D Productivity. The Economics of Corporate Governance and Mergers; Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, 2008.
  7. 7.↵
    Food and Drug Administration. Innovation/Stagnation: Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, 2004.
  8. 8.↵
    The European Medicines Agency. Road Map to 2010: Preparing the Ground for the Future; The European Medicines Agency: London, 2005.
  9. 9.↵
    The European Medicines Agency. Road Map to 2015: The Agency's Contribution to Science, Medicines, Health (draft for public consultation); The European Medicines Agency: London, 2009.
  10. 10.↵
    Department of Health and Human Services. FDA Strategic Action Plan: Charting Our Course for the Future; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, 2007.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Woodcock J.,
    2. Woosley R.
    The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Ann. Rev. Med. 2008, 59, 1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Milne C.-P.
    U.S. and European regulatory initiatives to improve R&D performance. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2006, 1 (1), 11–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Enkel E.,
    2. Gassmann O.,
    3. Chesbrough H.
    Open R&D innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 2009, 39 (4), 311–316.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Chesbrough H. W.
    The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 2003, 44 (3), 35–41.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Talaga P.
    Open innovation: share or die. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14 (21–22), 1003–1005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Crommelin D.,
    2. Stolk P.,
    3. Besancon L.,
    4. Shah V.,
    5. Midha K.,
    6. Leufkens H.
    Pharmaceutical sciences in 2020. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2010, 9 (2), 99–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hunter J.,
    2. Stephens S.
    Is open innovation the way forward for big pharma? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2010, 9 (2), 87–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ginsberg A.,
    2. Venkatraman N.
    Contingency perspective of organizational strategy: a critical review of the empirical research. Academy of Management Review 1985, 10 (3), 421–434.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tranfield D.,
    2. Denyer D.,
    3. Smart P.
    Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management 2003, 14, 207–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Meyer A. D.,
    2. Brooks G. R.,
    3. Goes J. B.
    Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management Journal 1990, 11 (summer special issue: corporate entrepreneurship), 93–110.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chan Y.,
    2. Walmsley R.
    Learning and understanding the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis-of-cariance-by-ranks test for differences among three or more independent groups. Phys. Ther. 1997, 77 (12), 1755–1761.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    British Telecommunications. Pharma Futurology: Joined-Up Healthcare—2016 and Beyond. Touch Briefings: London, 2007.
  23. 23.↵
    Deloitte Consulting. Strategic Flexibility in Life Sciences—From Discovering the Unknown to Exploiting the Uncertain; Deloitte Research: New York, 2002.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hohman M.,
    2. Gregory K.,
    3. Chibale K.,
    4. Smith P. J.,
    5. Ekins S.,
    6. Bunin B.
    Novel web-based tools combining chemistry informatics, biology and social networks for drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14 (5–6), 261–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lundberg J. M.,
    2. Reilly C.
    The road ahead for large Pharma: long-term science and innovation. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14 (9–10), 439–441.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    ESF–European Medical Research Councils. Nanomedicine: An ESF–European Medical Research Councils (EMRC) Forward Look Report; European Science Foundation: Strasbourg, France, 2005.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Woosley R. L.,
    2. Cossman J.
    Drug development and the FDA's Critical Path Initiative. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 81 (1), 129–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Humer F. B.
    The future of healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry—a CEO view. Journal of Men's Health & Gender 2004, 1 (1):107–109.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Jain K. K.
    The role of nanobiotechnology in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 2005, 10 (21), 1435–1442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Phan J.,
    2. Moffitt R.,
    3. Stokes T.,
    4. Liu J.,
    5. Young A. N.,
    6. Nie S.,
    7. Wang M. D.
    Convergence of biomarkers, bioinformatics and nanotechnology for individualized cancer treatment. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27 (6), 350–358.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Aspinall M. G.,
    2. Hamermesh R. G.
    Realizing the promise of personalized medicine. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2007, 85 (10), 108–117, 165.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Guidi G. C.,
    2. Lippi G.
    Will “personalized medicine” need personalized laboratory approach? Clin. Chim. Acta 2009, 400 (1–2), 25–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Adams J.,
    2. Mounib E.,
    3. Pai A.,
    4. Stuart N.,
    5. Thomas R.,
    6. Tomaszewicz P.
    Healthcare 2015: Win-Win or Lose-Lose? IBM Global Business Services: Somers, NY, 2006.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Mulder J.,
    2. Fezza T.,
    3. Marcello R.
    Reinventing Innovation in Large Pharma; Deloitte Development LLC: New York, 2008.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ginsburg G. S.,
    2. McCarthy J. J.
    Personalized medicine: revolutionizing drug discovery and patient care. Trends Biotechnol. 2001, 19 (12), 491–496.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. O'Connell D.,
    2. Roblin D.
    Translational research in the pharmaceutical industry: from bench to bedside. Drug Discov. Today 2006, 11 (17–18), 833–838.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Marrer E.,
    2. Dieterle F.
    Promises of biomarkers in drug development—a reality check. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 69 (6), 381–394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Michelson S.,
    2. Sehgal A.,
    3. Friedrich C.
    In silico prediction of clinical efficacy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17 (6), 666–670.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Zerhouni E. A.
    Translational research: moving discovery to practice. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 81 (1), 1621–1623.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Wehling M.
    Translational medicine: can it really facilitate the transition of research “from bench to bedside”? Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 62 (2), 91–95.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Saha D.,
    2. Mukherjee A.
    Pervasive computing: a paradigm for the 21st century. IEEE Computer Society 2003, 36 (3), 25–31.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Satyanarayanan M.
    Pervasive computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Personal Communications 2001, 8 (4), 10–17.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Clemensen J.,
    2. Larsen S. B.,
    3. Bardram J. E.
    Developing pervasive e-health for moving experts from hospital to home. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet 2004, 2 (2), 57–68.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Scheffler M.,
    2. Hirt E.
    Wearable devices for telemedicine applications. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2005, 11 (1), 11–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Osmani V.,
    2. Balasubramaniam S.,
    3. Botvich D.
    Human activity recognition in pervasive health-care: Supporting efficient remote collaboration. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2008, 31, 628–655.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Floerkemeier C.,
    2. Siegemund F.
    Improving the Effectiveness of Medical Treatment with Pervasive Computing Technologies. Second International Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing for Pervasive Healthcare Applications, Seattle, WA, 2003.
  47. 47.↵
    1. Pandian P. S.,
    2. Mohanavelu K.,
    3. Safeer K. P.,
    4. Kotresh T. M.,
    5. Shakunthala D. T.,
    6. Gopal P.,
    7. Padaki V. C.
    Smart Vest: wearable multi-parameter remote physiological monitoring system. Med. Eng. Phys. 2008, 30 (4), 466–477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Engin M.,
    2. Demirel A.,
    3. Engin E. Z.,
    4. Fedakar M.
    Recent developments and trends in biomedical sensors. Measurement 2005, 37 (2), 173–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Sriram J.,
    2. Shin M.,
    3. Kotz D.,
    4. Rajan A.,
    5. Sastry M.,
    6. Yarvis M.
    Challenges in Data Quality Assurance in Pervasive Health Monitoring Systems. Future of Trust in Computing: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2009.
  50. 50.↵
    1. Orwat C.,
    2. Graefe A.,
    3. Faulwasser T.
    Towards pervasive computing in health care—a literature review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008, 8 (26), 1–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    1. Buyya R.,
    2. Shin Yeo C.,
    3. Venugopal S.,
    4. Broberg J.,
    5. Brandic I.
    Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems 2009, 25 (6), 599–616.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Sloan K.
    Security in a virtualized world. Network Security 2009, 8, 15–18.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Sneha S.,
    2. Varshney U.
    Enabling ubiquitous patient monitoring: model, decision protocols, opportunities and challenges. Decision Support Systems 2009, 46 (3), 606–619.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    1. Shah V.,
    2. Besancon L. J. R.,
    3. Stolk P.,
    4. Tucker G.,
    5. Crommelin D. J. A.
    The pharmaceutical sciences in 2020—report of a conference organized by the Board of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 38 (5), 419–425.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Foster B. C.
    Foresight scanning: future directions of clinical and pharmaceutical research. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 11 (4), 108–122.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    1. Shuchman M.
    Commercializing clinical trials—risks and benefits of the CRO boom. New Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357 (14), 1365–1368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. Pharma 2020: Virtual R&D—Which Path Will You Take? 2008.
  58. 58.↵
    1. Love B.
    Virtual pharmaceutical R&D: a strategy for the millennium? Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today 1998, 1 (3), 89–90.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    1. Heemstra H. E.,
    2. de Vrueh R. L. A.,
    3. van Weely S.,
    4. Buller H. A.,
    5. Leufkens H. G. M.
    Orphan drug development across Europe: bottlenecks and opportunities. Drug Discov. Today 2008, 13 (15–16), 670–676.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Fraser H.
    Pharma 2010: A bitter sweet pill. Specra Online 2006, 2, http://newsweaver.co.uk/spectrajournal/e_000118357000063547.cfm?x=b11,0,w. Accessed July 2010.
  61. 61.↵
    1. Miller R.,
    2. Ewy W.,
    3. Corrigan B. W.,
    4. Quellet D.,
    5. Hermann D.,
    6. Kowalski K. G.,
    7. Lockwood P.,
    8. Koup J. R.,
    9. Donevan S.,
    10. El-Kattan A.,
    11. Li C. S.,
    12. Werth J. L.,
    13. Feltner D. E.,
    14. Lalonde R. L.
    How modeling and simulation have enhanced decision making in new drug development. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 2005, 32 (2), 185–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Boswell C.
    The future of pharmaceuticals is in targeted treatment, says IBM. Chemical Market Reporter 2002, 262 (22), 12.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    1. Prendergast J.,
    2. Yeomans M.,
    3. Fraser H. E.
    Pharma 2010—The Value-Creating Supply Chain; IBM Global Services: Somers, NY; 2004.
  64. 64.↵
    1. Funning S.,
    2. Grahnen A.,
    3. Eriksson K.,
    4. Kettis-Linblad A.
    Quality assurance within the scope of good clinical practice (GCP)—what is the cost of GCP-related activities? A survey within the Swedish Association of the Pharmaceutical Industry (LIF)'s members. Quality Assurance Journal 2009, 12 (1), 3–7.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting. Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, and Q10 Quality Guidelines—Topic Introduction and FDA Perspective. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, 2009.
  66. 66.↵
    1. Bass S.,
    2. Klasmeier C.,
    3. Lugard M. J. F.,
    4. Silvis L. R.,
    5. Simon C.-M.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency Enter into New Good Clinical Practices Collaboration. Sidley Austin LLP: Chicago, IL, 2009.
  67. 67.↵
    1. Calfee J. E.
    Playing catch-up—the FDA, science, and drug regulation. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research 2006, 5, http://www.aei.org/outlook/24130. Accessed July 2010.
  68. 68.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Critical Path Opportunities Report; FDA: Rockville, MD, 2006.
  69. 69.↵
    1. Yu L. X.
    Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25 (4), 781–791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Garcia T.,
    2. Cook G.,
    3. Nosal R.
    PQLI key topics—criticality, design space, and control strategy. J. Pharm. Innov. 2008, 3 (2), 60–68.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    Visiongain market research report. Live-Licensing & In-Life Testing: R&D Processes and Regulation for New Drugs, 2008–2020; Visiongain: London, 2008.
  72. 72.↵
    Health Canada. Progressive Licensing Model; Health Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, 2007.
  73. 73.↵
    1. Wright J. M.
    Progressive drug licensing—an opportunity to achieve transparency and accountability. CMAJ 2007, 176 (13), 1848–1849.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  74. 74.↵
    1. Hebert P. C.
    Progressive licensing needs progressive open debate. CMAJ 2007, 176 (13), 1801.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  75. 75.↵
    1. Lexchin J.
    Progressive licensing of drugs—music or noise? Healthcare Policy 2008, 3 (4), 11–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Hamburg M.
    Effective Enforcement and Benefits to Public Health. Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, 2009, http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Speeches/ucm175983.htm. Accessed June 2010.
  77. 77.↵
    1. Basile E. M.,
    2. Furman F. P.,
    3. Lee M.
    FDA's Outlook under the New Administration. King & Spalding Client Alert: Washington, DC, 2009.
  78. 78.↵
    1. Sager B.
    Scenarios on the future of biotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2001, 68 (2), 109–129.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    U.S. National Intelligence Council. Global Trends 2015: A Dialogue about the Future with Nongovernment Experts; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2000.
  80. 80.↵
    1. Schmid E. F.,
    2. Smith D. A.
    Is pharmaceutical R&D just a game of chance or can strategy make a difference? Drug Discov. Today 2004, 9 (1), 18–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Cooke P.
    Biotechnology clusters in the UK: lessons from localization in the commercialization of science. Small Business Economics 2001, 17 (1–2), 43–59.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    1. Wagner V.,
    2. Dullaart A.,
    3. Bock A.-K.,
    4. Zweck A.
    The emerging nanomedicine landscape. Nature Biotechnol. 2006, 24 (10), 1211–1217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. 83.↵
    European Science Foundation. Nanoscience and the Long-Term Future of Information Technology (NSIT). European Science Foundation: Strasbourg, France, 2006.
  84. 84.↵
    1. Sahoo S. K.,
    2. Parveen S.,
    3. Panda J. J.
    The present and future of nanotechnology in human health care. Nanomedicine 2007, 3 (1), 20–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    1. Wiek A.,
    2. Gasser L.,
    3. Siegrist M.
    Systemic scenarios of nanotechnology: sustainable governance of emerging technologies. Futures 2009, 41 (5), 284–300.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.↵
    Institute for Alternative Futures and the Draper Laboratory. Envision a Small Future; Institute for Alternative Futures: Alexandria, VA, 2005.
  87. 87.↵
    1. Rauwerda H.,
    2. Roos M.,
    3. Hertzberger B. O.,
    4. Breit T. M.
    The promise of a virtual lab in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 2006, 11 (5–6), 228–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    1. Ananthaswamy A.
    March of the motes. New Scientist 2003, 179 (2409), 26.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 67 (2)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 67, Issue 2
March/April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry—A Systematic Review of the Literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry—A Systematic Review of the Literature
Nader Shafiei, James L. Ford, Charles W. Morecroft, Paulo J. Lisboa, Mark J. Taylor, Yusra Mouzughi
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2013, 67 (2) 105-122; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00904

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry—A Systematic Review of the Literature
Nader Shafiei, James L. Ford, Charles W. Morecroft, Paulo J. Lisboa, Mark J. Taylor, Yusra Mouzughi
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2013, 67 (2) 105-122; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00904
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Methodology
    • 3. Results and Discussion
    • 4. Conclusions
    • Limitations
    • Conflict of Interest Statement
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry--A Systematic Analysis of Operational Evidence
  • Characterization of the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Regulatory Environment
  • Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Transformation-Induced Quality Risks--A Survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Microorganism Profile Identified in Bioburden Analysis in a Biopharmaceutical Facility in Brazil: Criteria for Classification and Management of Results
  • Evaluation of Extreme Depyrogenation Conditions on the Surface Hydrolytic Resistance of Glass Containers for Pharmaceutical Use
  • A Holistic Approach for Filling Volume Variability Evaluation and Control with Statistical Tool
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Pharmaceutical transformation
  • Quality risks
  • Regulatory science
  • Fully integrated pharma network
  • Personalized medicine
  • Translational research
  • Pervasive computing
  • Open innovation

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire