Scale-up of Sterilizing-grade Membrane Filters from Discs to Pleated Cartridges: Effects of Operating Parameters and Solution Properties

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Cardona M.,
   2. Martin C.

   Pleated membrane filters improve process economics: Drug manufacturers can take advantage of better, faster, and smaller paradigm. Biopharm. Intl. 2005, 18 (1), 20.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   1. Chen D.-R.,
   2. Pui D. Y. H.,
   3. Liu B. Y. H.

   Optimization of pleated filters designs using a finite element numerical model. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1995, 23 (4) 579–590.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   1. Badmington F.,
   2. Honig E.,
   3. Payne M.,
   4. Wilkins R.

   V_max testing for practical microfiltration train scale-up in biopharmaceutical processing. Pharm. Technol. 1995, 19 (9), 64–76.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   1. Tarleton S.,
   2. Wakeman R.

   Solid/Liquid Separation: Scale-up of Industrial Equipment; Elsevier: Oxford, 2011; p 146.

   Google Scholar
5. 5.↵
   1. Hermia J.

   Constant pressure blocking filtration laws—applications to power law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1982, 60 (3), 183–187.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   1. Caesar T.,
   2. Schroth T.

   The influence of pleat geometry on the pressure drop in deep-pleated cassette filters. Filtration and Separation 2002, 39 (9), 48–52.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   1. Del Fabbro L.,
   2. Laborde J. C.,
   3. Merlin P.,
   4. Ricciardi L.

   Air flows and pressure drop modeling for different pleated industrial filters. Filtration and Separation 2002, 39 (1), 34–40.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   1. Baléo J.-N.,
   2. Subrenat A.,
   3. Cloirec P. L.

   Numerical simulation of flows in air treatment devices using activated carbon cloths filters. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55 (10), 1807–1816.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   1. Chen C.-W.,
   2. Huang S.-H.,
   3. Chiang C.-M.,
   4. Hsiao T.-C.,
   5. Chen C.-C.

   Filter quality of pleated filter cartridges. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2008, 52 (3), 207–212.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    1. Brown A. I.,
    2. Levison P.,
    3. Titchener-Hooker N. J.,
    4. Lye G. J.

    Membrane pleating effects in 0.2 μm rated microfiltration cartridges. J. Membrane Sci. 2009, 341 (1), 76–83.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    1. Nassehi V.,
    2. Hanspal N. S.,
    3. Waghode A. N.,
    4. Ruziwa W. R.,
    5. Wakeham R. J.

    Finite-element modeling of combined free/porous flow regimes: simulation of flow through pleated cartridge filters. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60 (4), 995–1006.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    1. Wakeham R. J.,
    2. Hanspal N. S.,
    3. Waghode A. N.,
    4. Nassehi V.

    Analysis of pleat crowding and medium compression in pleated cartridge filters. Chem. Eng. Res. Design 2005, 83 (10), 1246–1255.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    1. Subrenat A.,
    2. Bellettre J.,
    3. Le Cloirec P.

    3-D numerical simulations of flows in a cylindrical pleated filter packed with activated carbon cloth. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58 (22), 4965–4973.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    1. Bessiere Y.,
    2. Fletcher D. F.,
    3. Bacchin P.

    Numerical simulation of colloid dead-end filtration: effect of membrane characteristics and operating conditions on matter accumulation. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313 (1), 52–59.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    1. Bessiere Y.,
    2. Abidine N.,
    3. Bacchin P.

    Low fouling conditions in dead-end filtration: evidence for a critical filtered volume and interpretation using critical osmotic pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264 (1), 37–47.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    1. Bouzerar R.,
    2. Ding L.,
    3. Jaffrin M. Y.

    Local permeate flux-shear-pressure relationships in a rotating disk microfiltration module: implications for global performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170 (1), 127–141.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    1. Brown A. I.,
    2. Titchener-Hooker N. J.,
    3. Lye G. J.

    Scale down prediction of industrial scale pleated membrane cartridge performance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108 (4), 830–838.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    1. Heese F.,
    2. Robson P.,
    3. Hall L.

    Magnetic resonance imaging velocimetry of fluid flow in a clinical blood filter. AIChE J. 2005, 51 (9), 2396–2401.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    1. Gigla S.,
    2. Yavorsky D.

    Scaling from discs to pleated devices. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2007, 61 (4), 314–323.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    Pall Corporation. Evaluating the scalability of 0.1 μm–rated membrane filters—Part 1. BioPharm Intl. 2009, June, 36.

    Google Scholar
21. 21.↵
    1. Stoyell R. C.,
    2. Williamson K. M.,
    3. Hopkins S. D.,
    4. Geibel S. A.,
    5. Wolff T. L.

    Filters with Over-laid Pleats in Intimate Contact, U.S. Patent Number 5,543,047, 1996.

    Google Scholar
22. 22.↵
    1. Gollan A.,
    2. Parekh B. S.

    Hydrodynamics of semi-dense pleat design in pleated cartridges. Filtration and Separation 1985, 22 (5), 326–329.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
23. 23.↵
    1. Gray D. E.

    American Institute of Physics Handbook, 3rd ed.; Gray D. E., Ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar
24. 24.↵
    1. Kumar A.,
    2. Egli S.,
    3. Martin J.,
    4. Golightly C.,
    5. Kuriyel R.

    Contamination costs: current trends in process economics for mycoplasma-retentive cell culture media. Eur. Biopharm. Rev. 2009, 12 (114), 68–74.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar