Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Case ReportCase Study

Data Integrity—A Study of Current Regulatory Thinking and Action

Nader Shafiei, Regis De Montardy and Edwin Rivera-Martinez
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology November 2015, 69 (6) 762-770; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01082
Nader Shafiei
1Sanofi Global Quality Strategy & Systems, Bridgewater, NJ;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Nader.Shafiei@sanofi.com
Regis De Montardy
2Sanofi Global Quality Strategy & Systems, Croix de Berny, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edwin Rivera-Martinez
3Sanofi Global Quality Audit, Bridgewater, NJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cosgrove T.
    Opening Remarks. Presented at the ISPE-FDA CGMP Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, June 2–4, 2014.
  2. 2.↵
    FDA Media Briefing. Commissioner Hamburg on her visit to India. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/NewsEvents/Newsroom/MediaTranscripts/UCM387679.pdf (accessed January 24, 2015).
  3. 3.↵
    Business Today. Compliance doesn't end with approval: US FDA commissioner. http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/203213 (accessed January 24, 2015).
  4. 4.↵
    1. Moore N,
    2. Juillet Y,
    3. Bertoye P.-H.
    Intégrité des données scientifiques: transparence des données recueillies au cours des essais cliniques, accès aux données. Thérapie 2007, 62(3), 203–209.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lindblad A. S.,
    2. Manukyan Z.,
    3. Purohit-Sheth T.,
    4. Gensler G.,
    5. Okwesili P.,
    6. Meeker-O'Connell A.,
    7. Ball L.,
    8. Marler J. R.
    Central site monitoring: results from a test of accuracy in identifying trials and sites failing Food and Drug Administration inspection. Clinical Trials. 2014, 11(2), 205–217.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Takahashi K.
    Data Integrity: Warning Letters. Presented at the PDA Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA, April 7–9, 2014.
  7. 7.↵
    GCP Inspectors Working Group. Reflection Paper on Expectations for Electronic Source Data and Data Transcribed to Electronic Data Collection Tools in Clinical Trials; EMA/INS/GCP/454280/2010: London, UK, June 9, 2010.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Katz P. R.
    Protecting the public's health through the application integrity policy. Food & Drug Law Journal 2010, 65(3), 539–543.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rosa C.
    Current Inspectional & Compliance Issues in Data Integrity. Presented at the ISPE-FDA CGMP Conference, Baltimore, MMD, USA, June 2–4, 2014.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rosa C.
    ICH Q7 Principles and Data Integrity. Presented at the PDA-PIC/S Training on ICH Q7, Bethesda, MD, USA, February 2014.
  11. 11.↵
    MHRA News. MHRA expectation regarding self-inspection and data integrity. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141205150130/ http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Inspectionandstandards/GoodManufacturingPractice/News/CON355490 (accessed January 24, 2015).
  12. 12.↵
    FDA. Guidance for Industry. Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2013.
  13. 13.↵
    FDA Inspection Guides. Glossary of Computer System Software Development Terminology. http://www.fda.gov/iceci/inspections/inspectionguides/ucm074875.htm (accessed January 24, 2015).
  14. 14.↵
    FDA. Guidance for Industry. Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures—Scope and Application; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2003.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hickey C.
    FDA works with China to ensure medical-product safety. FDA Voice. http://blogs.fda.gov/fdavoice/index.php/2014/04/fda-works-with-china-to-ensure-medical-product-safety/ (accessed January 24, 2015).
  16. 16.↵
    EMA. Roadmap to 2015: EMA Contribution to Science, Medicines and Health; London, UK, 2010.
  17. 17.↵
    EMA. EU GMPs. Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use: Annex 11 Computerised Systems. SANCO/C8/AM/sl/ares(2010)1064599; Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  18. 18.↵
    FDA. Guidance for Industry. Oversight of Clinical Investigations—A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2013.
  19. 19.↵
    FDA. Guidance for Industry. Product Development under the Animal Rule—Draft; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2014.
  20. 20.↵
    Press Release: PIC/S Expert Circle on Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs); Rome, Italy; http://www.picscheme.org/bo/commun/upload/document/press-release-rome-2014-copy1.pdf (accessed January 24, 2015).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 69 (6)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 69, Issue 6
November/December 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Data Integrity—A Study of Current Regulatory Thinking and Action
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Data Integrity—A Study of Current Regulatory Thinking and Action
Nader Shafiei, Regis De Montardy, Edwin Rivera-Martinez
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Nov 2015, 69 (6) 762-770; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Data Integrity—A Study of Current Regulatory Thinking and Action
Nader Shafiei, Regis De Montardy, Edwin Rivera-Martinez
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Nov 2015, 69 (6) 762-770; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01082
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Regulatory Actions
    • Current Regulatory Thinking Inferred From the Analysis of the Case Studies
    • Discussion
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Visual Inspection of Topical Ophthalmic Formulations Packaged in Opaque and Semi-Transparent Containers: Working Towards Alignment with USP<790> Visible Particulates in Injections
  • Determining Maximum Allowable Rubber Stopper Displacement for Container Closure Integrity (CCI)
  • Risk-Based Approach for Analytical Comparability and Comparability Protocols
Show more Case Study

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Data integrity
  • Regulatory action
  • Regulatory thinking
  • Human errors
  • Noncompliance

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire