Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticlePDA Paper

Currently Available Recombinant Alternatives to Horseshoe Crab Blood Lysates: Are They Comparable for the Detection of Environmental Bacterial Endotoxins? A Review

Jay Bolden, Chris Knutsen, Jack Levin, Catherine Milne, Tina Morris, Ned Mozier, Ingo Spreitzer and Friedrich von Wintzingerode
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology September 2020, 74 (5) 602-611; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012187
Jay Bolden
1Eli Lilly and Company;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jbolden@lilly.com
Chris Knutsen
2Bristol Myers Squibb;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Levin
3University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Milne
4European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Morris
5American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ned Mozier
6Pfizer;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingo Spreitzer
7Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Friedrich von Wintzingerode
8Roche-Genentech
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ding J. L.,
    2. Bow H
    . Cloned factor C cDNA of the Singapore Horseshoe Crab, Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda and purification of Factor C proenzyme. U.S. Patent 5712144A, June 2, 1995.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tamura H.
    The Road to Next Generation LAL Technology. EC Bacteriol. Virol. Res. 2016, ECO.01: 04–05. https://www.ecronicon.com/eco16/pdf/ECBVR-01-ECO-03.pdf (accessed May 28, 2020).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Alwis K. U.,
    2. Milton D. K.
    Recombinant Factor C Assay for Measuring Endotoxin in House Dust: Comparison with LAL, and (1→3)-β D-Glucans. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2006, 49 (4), 296–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Thorne P. S.,
    2. Perry S. S.,
    3. Saito R.,
    4. O’Shaughnessy P. T.,
    5. Mehaffy J.,
    6. Metwali N.,
    7. Keefe T.,
    8. Donham K. J.,
    9. Reynolds S. J.
    Evaluation of the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate and Recombinant Factor C Assays for Assessment of Airborne Endotoxin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76 (15), 4988–4995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. McKenzie J. H.,
    2. Alwis K. U.,
    3. Sordillo J. E.,
    4. Kalluri K. S.,
    5. Milton D. K.
    Evaluation of Lot-to-Lot Repeatability and Effect of Assay Media Choice in the Recombinant Factor C Assay. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13 (6), 1739–1745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chen L.,
    2. Mozier N.
    Comparison of Limulus Amebocyte Lysate Test Methods for Endotoxin Measurement in Protein Solutions. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 80, 180–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bolden J.,
    2. Smith K.
    Application of Recombinant Factor C Reagent for the Detection of Bacterial Endotoxins in Pharmaceutical Products. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2017, 71 (5), 405–412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kikuchi Y.,
    2. Hashima Y.,
    3. Fukui C.,
    4. Murai T.,
    5. Nakagawa Y.,
    6. Ebisawa A.,
    7. Matsumura K.,
    8. Ouchi K.,
    9. Oda T.,
    10. Mukai M.,
    11. Masuda T.,
    12. Katto Y.,
    13. Takasuga Y.,
    14. Takaoka A.
    Collaborative Study on the Bacterial Endotoxins Test Using Recombinant Factor C-Based Procedure for Detection of Lipopolysaccharides Part 1. Pharm. Med. Device Regul. Sci. 2017, 48 (4), 252–260.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kikuchi Y.,
    2. Hashima Y.,
    3. Fukui C.,
    4. Nakagawa Y.,
    5. Ebisawa A.,
    6. Morioka T.,
    7. Matsumura K.,
    8. Ouchi K.,
    9. Uchida K.,
    10. Martinez O. K.,
    11. Oda T.,
    12. Mukai M.,
    13. Masuda T.,
    14. Tsukihashi Y.,
    15. Takasuga Y.,
    16. Takaoka A.
    Collaborative Study on the Bacterial Endotoxins Test Using Recombinant Factor C-Based Procedure for Detection of Lipopolysaccharides Part 2. Pharm. Med. Device Regul. Sci. 2018, 49, 708–718.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kaur R.,
    2. Sharma M.,
    3. Ji D.,
    4. Xu M.,
    5. Agyei D.
    Structural Features, Modification, and Functionalities of Beta-Glucan. Fibers 2020, 8 (1), 1–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Schwarz H.,
    2. Schmittner M.,
    3. Duschl A.,
    4. Horejs-Hoeck J.
    Residual Endotoxin Contaminations in Recombinant Proteins Are Sufficient to Activate Human CD1c+ Dendritic Cells. PLoS One 2014, 9 (12), e113840.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Schwarz H.,
    2. Gornicec J.,
    3. Neuper T.,
    4. Parigiani M. A.,
    5. Wallner M.,
    6. Duschl A.,
    7. Horejs-Hoeck J.
    Biological Activity of Masked Endotoxin. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 44750.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Parenteral Drug Association Inc. Technical Report No. 82: Low Endotoxin Recovery; Bethesda, MD, 2019. https://www.pda.org/bookstore/pda-bookstore (accessed May 28, 2020).
  14. 14.↵
    1. Loverock B.,
    2. Simon B.,
    3. Burgenson A.,
    4. Baines A.
    Stimuli to the Revision Process: A Recombinant Factor C Procedure for the Detection of Gram-Negative Bacterial Endotoxin. Pharmacopeial Forum 2010, 36 (1), 321–329. http://www.usppf.com/ (accessed May 28, 2020).
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Abate W.,
    2. Sattar A. A.,
    3. Liu J.,
    4. Conway M. E.,
    5. Jackson S. K.
    Evaluation of Recombinant Factor C Assay for the Detection of Divergent Lipopolysaccharide Structural Species and Comparison with Limulus Amebocyte Lysate-Based Assays and a Human Monocyte Activity Assay. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 66 (7), 888–897.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bolden J.,
    2. Knight M.,
    3. Stockman S.,
    4. Omokoko B.
    Results of a Harmonized Endotoxin Recovery Study Protocol Evaluation by 14 BioPhorum Operations Group (BPOG) Member Companies. Biologicals 2017, 48, 74–81.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Piehler M.,
    2. Roeder R.,
    3. Blessing S.,
    4. Reich J.
    Comparison of LAL and rFC Assays—Participation in a Proficiency Test Program between 2014 and 2019. Microorganisms 2020, 8 (3), 418–411.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Muroi M.,
    2. Ogura N.,
    3. Mizumura H.,
    4. Aketagawa J.,
    5. Oda T.,
    6. Tanamoto K.-I.
    Application of a Recombinant Three-Factor Chromogenic Reagent, PyroSmart, for Bacterial Endotoxins Test Filed in the Pharmacopeias. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 42 (12), 2024–2037.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Marius M.,
    2. Vacher F.,
    3. Bonnevay T.
    Comparison of LAL and Recombinant Factor C Endotoxin Testing Assays in Human Vaccines with Complex Matrices. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2020, 74 (4), 394–407.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Council of Europe, Guidelines for using the test for bacterial endotoxins, Chapter 5.1.10. In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 9th Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2017. www.edqm.eu (accessed May 28, 2020).
  21. 21.↵
    General Chapter <1085> Guidelines on the Endotoxin Test. Pharmacopeial Forum 2018, 44 (4). https://www.uspnf.com/notices/1085-guidelines-on-endotoxin-test (accessed May 28, 2020).
  22. 22.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, General Chapter <85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test. In USP 41–NF 36. USP: Rockville, MD, 2018. www.usp.org (accessed May 28, 2020).
  23. 23.↵
    Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare of Japan, Bacterial Endotoxins Test and alternative methods using recombinant protein-reagents for endotoxin assay. In The Japanese Pharmacopoeia, MHLW: Tokyo, 2019. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000231653.pdf (accessed May 28, 2020).
  24. 24.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry: Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers, 2012. FDA Web site. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/pyrogen-and-endotoxins-testing-questions-and-answers (accessed May 28, 2020).
  25. 25.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, General Chapter <1225> Validation of Compendial Procedures. In USP 40—NF 35, USP: Rockville, MD, 2017. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5b03/95b168eff40a79b267de263480db5020dd05.pdf (accessed May 28, 2020).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 74 (5)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 74, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Currently Available Recombinant Alternatives to Horseshoe Crab Blood Lysates: Are They Comparable for the Detection of Environmental Bacterial Endotoxins? A Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Currently Available Recombinant Alternatives to Horseshoe Crab Blood Lysates: Are They Comparable for the Detection of Environmental Bacterial Endotoxins? A Review
Jay Bolden, Chris Knutsen, Jack Levin, Catherine Milne, Tina Morris, Ned Mozier, Ingo Spreitzer, Friedrich von Wintzingerode
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Sep 2020, 74 (5) 602-611; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012187

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Currently Available Recombinant Alternatives to Horseshoe Crab Blood Lysates: Are They Comparable for the Detection of Environmental Bacterial Endotoxins? A Review
Jay Bolden, Chris Knutsen, Jack Levin, Catherine Milne, Tina Morris, Ned Mozier, Ingo Spreitzer, Friedrich von Wintzingerode
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Sep 2020, 74 (5) 602-611; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012187
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Suppliers and Techniques
    • Literature Review
    • Summary of the Literature Review
    • Compendial Approaches
    • Regulatory Review
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of Interest Statement
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Recombinant Factor C Validation--Simpler Than You Think!
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management
  • Controls to Minimize Disruption of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Show more PDA Paper

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Endotoxin testing
  • Recombinant factor C
  • Amebocyte lysates
  • LAL
  • rFC
  • Horseshoe crabs
  • Environmental endotoxin
  • Recombinant technologies

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire