Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Review ArticleReview

ISO 9001:2015 Versus ICH Q10 — A Comparison

Carsten Aaberg, Heribert Dahmen, Cledwyn Davies, Pia Lise Sandau and Raman Srinivasan
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology March 2021, 75 (2) 188-206; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2020.011692
Carsten Aaberg
1Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Alle 1, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heribert Dahmen
2Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Straße 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: heribert.dahmen@merckgroup.com
Cledwyn Davies
3Porton Biopharma Ltd, Manor Farm Road, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pia Lise Sandau
4Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raman Srinivasan
5Biocon Biologics India Ltd, 20th KM, Hosur Road, Electronic City, Bangalore 560100, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Do the changes to ISO 9001 from the 2008 version to the 2015 version warrant revision of ICH Q10? Or does ICH Q10 still meet the ISO 9001 principles? In 2008, the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) issued guideline ICH Q10, describing a model for a pharmaceutical quality system (PQS) that can be implemented throughout the different stages of a product life cycle. Explicitly, the guideline was not intended to create any new expectations beyond the existing regulatory requirements. ICH Q10 was founded on principles established by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) describing a model for the structure of a quality management system (QMS). Since 1987, these principles were codified in the ISO 9000 series of quality standards, for example, as revised in ISO 9001:2008. ICH Q10 also incorporated applicable good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations and complemented the existing ICH Q8 (R2) “Pharmaceutical Development” and ICH Q9 “Quality Risk Management” guidelines. ICH Q10 represents a harmonized model for a PQS that can be implemented throughout the different stages of a product life cycle. In 2015, ISO published ISO 9001:2015, a significant revision to the ISO 9001 QMS standard. This 2015 version contained extensive changes and a new structure. This revision to ISO 9001 raised the question of whether ICH Q10 should be reviewed and potentially revised, and whether ICH Q10 continues to meet the ISO 9000 principles. This article assessed whether the changes to the ISO 9001:2015 standard could make a revision of the ICH Q10 guideline necessary and whether ICH Q10 still represents a current model of a pharmaceutical quality management system.

  • ISO 9001:2015
  • ICH
  • Pharmaceutical quality system
  • Quality management system
  • Q10 Quality Guideline
  • © PDA, Inc. 2021
View Full Text

PDA members receive access to all articles published in the current year and previous volume year. Institutional subscribers received access to all content. Log in below to receive access to this article if you are either of these.  

If you are neither or you are a PDA member trying to access an article outside of your membership license, then you must purchase access to this article (below). If you do not have a username or password for JPST, you will be required to create an account prior to purchasing. 

Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only.

Note to pda.org users

The PDA and PDA bookstore websites (www.pda.org and www.pda.org/bookstore) are separate websites from the PDA JPST website. When you first join PDA, your initial UserID and Password are sent to HighWirePress to create your PDA JPST account. Subsequent UserrID and Password changes required at the PDA websites will not pass on to PDA JPST and vice versa. If you forget your PDA JPST UserID and/or Password, you can request help to retrieve UserID and reset Password below.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles

Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only. You can join PDA at www.pda.org. 

PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 75 (2)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 75, Issue 2
March/April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ISO 9001:2015 Versus ICH Q10 — A Comparison
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
ISO 9001:2015 Versus ICH Q10 — A Comparison
Carsten Aaberg, Heribert Dahmen, Cledwyn Davies, Pia Lise Sandau, Raman Srinivasan
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2021, 75 (2) 188-206; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.011692

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
ISO 9001:2015 Versus ICH Q10 — A Comparison
Carsten Aaberg, Heribert Dahmen, Cledwyn Davies, Pia Lise Sandau, Raman Srinivasan
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2021, 75 (2) 188-206; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.011692
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • History and Origin of ISO 9001 and ICH Q10
    • Commonality and Variance of ISO 9001 Versus ICH Q10—General Consideration
    • ISO 9001:2015 Changes from the 2008 to the 2015 Version
    • Detailed Assessment of the Changes to ISO 9001 and the Potential Impact on ICH Q10
    • Summary and Conclusions and Recommendations
    • Conflict of Interest Statement
    • Acknowledgements
    • Appendix
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Risk Assessment and Risk-Based Approach Review of Pre-Use/Post-Sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT)
  • Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification: A Journey Toward the Challenges and Benefits of AI in the Biopharmaceutical Industry
  • A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Product Life Cycle Management
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ISO 9001:2015
  • ICH
  • pharmaceutical quality system
  • Quality management system
  • Q10 Quality Guideline

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire