Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Article CommentaryCommentary

Ridding the World of ‘Rogues': Improving Vapor-Phase H2O2 Sterilization and Decontamination Processes

James Agalloco
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology September 2023, 77 (5) 412-419; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012727
James Agalloco
Agalloco & Associates, 22 Carriage Trail, Belle Mead, NJ 08502
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Parenteral Drug Association Inc. Technical Report No. 51: Biological Indicators for Gas and Vapor Phase Decontamination Processes: Specification, Manufacture, Control and Use; Bethesda, MD, 2010.
    Google Scholar
  2. 2.↵
    Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. MHRA Inspectorate Blog: VHP (Vapour Hydrogen Peroxide) Fragility. https://mhrainspectorate.blog.gov.uk/2018/04/20/vhp-vapour-hydrogen-peroxide-fragility/, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  3. 3.↵
    1. Krushefski G.
    Using Replicate BIs to Evaluate Biodecontamination Cycles in Isolators. Spore News 2013, 9 (4), 1–3.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.↵
    1. Eddington D.
    Heads or Tails: Statistical Methods for Interpreting Multiple Biological Indicator Results. PDA Letter 2016, 53 (8), 22–27.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.↵
    1. Drinkwater J.,
    2. Chewins J.,
    3. Steele G.
    Biological Indicators Don't Lie, but in Sporicidal Gassing Disinfection Cycles Do They Sometimes Confuse the Truth? Eur. J. Parenter. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 14 (1), 5–11.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gillitzer E.
    Parameters Effecting Vapor Hydrogen Peroxide Biological Indicator Performance. Spore News 2013, 9 (3), 1–4.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.↵
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14161:2009 Sterilization of Health Care Products— Biological Indicators—Guidance for the Selection, Use and Interpretation of Results. ISO: Geneva, 2009.
    Google Scholar
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shintani H.,
    2. Akers J. E.
    On the Cause of Performance Variation of Biological Indicator Used for Sterility Assurance. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2000, 54 (4), 332–342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.↵
    1. Agalloco J.,
    2. DeSantis P.,
    3. Grilli A.,
    4. Pavell A.
    1. McCauley K.,
    2. Robichaud N.,
    3. Gardner K.,
    4. Hostler C.
    Biological Indicators for Sterilization. In Handbook of Validation in Pharmaceutical Processes, 4th ed.; Agalloco J., DeSantis P., Grilli A., Pavell A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2021.
    Google Scholar
  10. 10.↵
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 18472:2006/(R)2010 Sterilization of Health Care Products—Biological and Chemical Indicators—Test Equipment. ISO: Geneva, 2010.
    Google Scholar
  11. 11.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, General Chapter <1229.5> Biological Indicators for Sterilization. In USP 39–NF34, Supplement 1; USP: Rockville, MD, 2016.
    Google Scholar
  12. 12.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, General Chapter <1229.11> Vapor Phase Sterilization, In USP 38–NF 33, Supplement 1, USP: Rockville, MD, 2015.
    Google Scholar
  13. 13.↵
    1. Agalloco J.
    Private communications, 2005–2021.
    Google Scholar
  14. 14.↵
    1. McCauley K.,
    2. Gillis J. R.
    The Effect of Carrier Material on the Measured Resistance of Spores. Pharm. Technol. 2007, 2007 (2 suppl), s26–s31.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.↵
    GKE. Indicators and Indicator Systems for Hydrogen Peroxide Processes. 710-012 EN V04.
    Google Scholar
  16. 16.↵
    Crosstex. Monitoring Products for Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide. INDVH2O2CAT 6993 REV.1.0, 2016.
    Google Scholar
  17. 17.↵
    Mesa Laboratories. https://biologicalindicators.mesalabs.com/all-biological-indicators/. (accessed October 14, 2021).
    Google Scholar
  18. 18.↵
    1. Reich R.,
    2. Caputo R. A.
    The Adverse Effects of Cellulosic Material in Isolator Barrier Technology. Pharm. Technol. 2005, 29 (11).
    Google Scholar
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kulla J.,
    2. Reich R.,
    3. Broedel S.
    Sterilizing Combination Products Using Oxides of Nitrogen. Med. Device Diagn. Ind. 2009, 39 (3).
    Google Scholar
  20. 20.↵
    1. Czarneski M. A.
    Selecting the Right Chemical Agent for Decontamination of Rooms and Chambers. Appl. Biosaf. 2007, 12 (2), 85–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.↵
    Dupont. The Truth About Vapor Permeability in High Humidity Environments. Building Science Bulletin, Form No. 43-D100849-enNA-0320 CDP, 2020.
    Google Scholar
  22. 22.↵
    1. Nieskes R.
    Are Tyvek®-Packaged Biological Indicators Appropriate for Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination? https://insidetheisolator.wordpress.com/2020/08/10/are-tyvek-packaged-biological-indicators-appropriate-for-vaporized-hydrogen-peroxide-decontamination/. (accessed October 14, 2021).
    Google Scholar
  23. 23.↵
    1. Agalloco J.,
    2. Akers J.
    Hydrogen Peroxide—Highly Potent & Highly Problematic. Pharm. Technol. 2013, 37 (9), 46–56.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.↵
    1. Agalloco J.,
    2. DeSantis P.
    The Science Behind Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination and Sterilization. Accepted for Publication in PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol.
    Google Scholar
  25. 25.↵
    1. Coles T.
    Vapour Phase Hydrogen Peroxide Bio-Decontamination: How the Process Operates to Achieve Rapid Log 6 Reduction of Biological Indicators. Presented at ISPE Isolation Conference, February 2018.
    Google Scholar
  26. 26.↵
    1. Block S. S.
    Peroxygen Compounds. In Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation, 5th ed; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, 2001., pp 185–204.
    Google Scholar
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ahlgren M.,
    2. Bjorkland Z.
    Robustness of a Biological Indicator Resistance Test Rig—a Study of Different Parameters, Methodologies, and Their Impact on the Measured D-value of the Biological Indicator. Bachelor Thesis, LTH School of Engineering, Lund University, 2005.
    Google Scholar
  28. 28.↵
    1. Toledo R. T.,
    2. Escher F. E.,
    3. Ayres J. C.
    Sporicidal Properties of Hydrogen Peroxide against Food Spoilage Organisms. Appl. Microbiol. 1973, 26 (4), 592–597.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.↵
    1. Watling D.
    Is H2O2 a Wet or Dry Process? Presented at PDA Isolator Technology Conference, 2002.
    Google Scholar
  30. 30.↵
    1. Unger-Bimczok B.,
    2. Kottke V.,
    3. Hertel C.,
    4. Rauschnabel J.
    The Influence of Humidity, Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration, and Condensation on the Inactivation of Geobacillus stearothermophilus Spores with Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor. J. Pharm. Innov. 2008, 3 (2), 123–133.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.↵
    1. Daubert T. E.,
    2. Danner R. P.
    Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals Data Compilation; Taylor and Francis: Washington, DC, 1989.
    Google Scholar
  32. 32.↵
    1. Levine I.
    Physical Chemistry, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, 2008.
    Google Scholar
  33. 33.↵
    1. Agalloco J.
    Real World H2O2 Decontamination. Pharm. Technol. 2020, 44 (1), 53–57.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.↵
    1. Agalloco J.
    Paradise Lost: Misdirection in the Implementation of Isolation Technology. Pharm. Manuf. 2016, 15 (4), 34.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rickloff J. R.
    Hydrogen Peroxide Gas and Its Use in Sterilizing Barrier Isolators. Proceedings of ISPE's 6th International Congress of Pharmaceutical Engineering, 1994.
    Google Scholar
  36. 36.↵
    1. Hultman C.,
    2. Hill A.,
    3. McDonnell G.
    The Physical Chemistry of Decontamination with Gaseous Hydrogen Peroxide. Pharm. Eng. 2007, 31 (1), 22–32.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.↵
    U.S. Patent 4,169,123, September 25, 1979.
    Google Scholar
  38. 38.↵
    U.S. Patent 4,230,663, October 28, 1980.
    Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 77 (5)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 77, Issue 5
September/October 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Ridding the World of ‘Rogues': Improving Vapor-Phase H2O2 Sterilization and Decontamination Processes
James Agalloco
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Sep 2023, 77 (5) 412-419; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012727
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Biological Indicators
    • The H2O2 Process
    • D-value Uncertainty in Vapor H2O2 Processes
    • The Bottom Line
    • Disclaimer
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Retrospective Evaluation of Cycled Resin in Viral Clearance Studies—A Multiple Company Collaboration—Post ICH Q5A(R2) Review
  • A Risk Based Approach for Pre-Use/Post-Sterilization Integrity Test Simulation During Bacterial Retention Testing as Part of the Process Specific Filter Validation of Sterilizing Grade Filters
  • Challenges and Solutions to Manufacturing of Low-Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration IgG1 Drug Products: From Late Downstream Process to Final Fill Finish Processing
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ridding the World of ‘Rogues': Improving Vapor-Phase H2O2 Sterilization and Decontamination Processes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Ridding the World of ‘Rogues': Improving Vapor-Phase H2O2 Sterilization and Decontamination Processes
James Agalloco
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Sep 2023, 77 (5) 412-419; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012727

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.