A Rapid Sterility Method Using Solid Phase Cytometry for Cell-Based Preparations and Culture Media and Buffers

References

1. 1.↵
   U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <1071> Rapid Sterility Testing of Short-Life Products: A Risk Based Approach. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021.
2. 2.↵
   U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <1223> Validation of Alternative Microbiological Methods. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021
3. 3.↵
   Parenteral Drug Association Inc. Technical Report No. 33: The Evaluation, Validation and Implementation of New Microbiological Testing Methods; Bethesda, MD, 2013.
4. 4.↵
   Council of Europe, Alternative Methods for Control of Microbiological Quality, Chapter 5.1.6. In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10.6 Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2022.
5. 5.↵
   Council of Europe, Microbiological Examination of Cell-Based Preparations, Chapter 2.6.27, In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10.6 Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2022.
6. 6.↵
   U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <71> Sterility Tests. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021.
7. 7.↵
   Council of Europe, Sterility, Chapter 2.6.1, In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10.6 Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2022.
8. 8.↵
   Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare of Japan, General Tests, Processes and Apparatus—4.06 Sterility Test. In The Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 16th Edition (English Version), MHLW: Tokyo, 2011.
9. 9.↵
   U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <61> Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021.
10. 10.↵
    1. Onadipe A.,
    2. Ulvedal K.

    A Method for the Rapid Detection of Microbial Contaminants in Animal Cell Culture Processes. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 337–345.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Ramond B.,
    2. Rolland X.,
    3. Planchez C.,
    4. Cornet P.,
    5. Antoni C.,
    6. Drocourt J.-L.

    Enumeration of Total Viable Microorganisms in Antibiotic Raw Material Using ChemScan Solid Phase Cytometer. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2000, 54 (4), 320–331.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Motulsky H. J.

    GraphPad Prism 9 Statistics Guide—Welcome to Prism 9 Statistics Guide and Principles of Statistics—Analysis Checklist: Contingency Tables. https://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/9/statistics/index.htm (accessed February 2, 2021)
13. 13.↵
    1. Hoenig J. M.,
    2. Heisey D. M.

    The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis. Am. Stat. 2001, 55 (1), 19–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Sun X.,
    2. Kurosu S.,
    3. Shintani H.

    The Expanded Application of the Most Probable Number to the Quantitative Evaluation of Extremely Low Microbial Count. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2006, 60 (2), 124–134.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Blodgett R.

    Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Appendix 2: Most Probable Number from Serial Dilutions. http://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/laboratorymethods/ucm109656.htm (accessed November 22, 2021).
16. 16.↵
    1. Rasch D.,
    2. Herrendörfer G.,
    3. Bock J.,
    4. Victor N.,
    5. Guiard V.

    Verfahrensbibliothek—Versuchsplanung und Auswertung; Oldenbourg: Munich, 2000; pp 689–691.
17. 17.↵
    1. Singer D. C.,
    2. Roesti D.,
    3. Cundell T.,
    4. Duguid J.,
    5. Tirumalai R.

    New USP Microbiology Content Will Support Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacturing. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2021.
18. 18.↵
    1. Smith R.,
    2. Von Tress M.,
    3. Tubb C.,
    4. Vanhaecke E.

    Evaluation of the ScanRDI(R) as a Rapid Alternative to the Pharmacopoeial Sterility Test Method: Comparison of the Limits of Detection. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2010, 64 (4), 356–363.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. McDaniel A.

    Microbial Detection in Mammalian Cell Culture Systems. Eur. Pharm. Rev. 2005, 4.
20. 20.↵
    Pharmacopeial Forum 46(6). Chapter <73> ATP Bioluminescence-Based Rapid Microbial Methods for the Release of Short Shelf Life Products. 2020.
21. 21.↵
    1. Gebo J. E. T.,
    2. Lau A. F.

    Sterility Testing for Cellular Therapies: What is the Role of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58 (7), e01492-19.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. England M. R.,
    2. Stock F.,
    3. Gebo J. E. T.,
    4. Frank K. M.,
    5. Lau A. F.

    Comprehensive Evaluation of Compendial USP<71>, BacT/Alert Dual-T, and Bactec FX for Detection of Product Sterility Testing Contaminants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57 (2), e01548-18.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Parveen S.,
    2. Kaur S.,
    3. David S. A.,
    4. Kenney J. L.,
    5. McCormick W. M.,
    6. Gupta R. K.

    Evaluation of Growth Based Rapid Microbiological Methods for Sterility Testing of Vaccines and Other Biological Products. Vaccine 2011, 29 (45), 8012–8023.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Patel P.,
    2. Garson J. A.,
    3. Tettmar K. I.,
    4. Ancliff S.,
    5. McDonald C.,
    6. Pitt T.,
    7. Coelho J.,
    8. Tedder R. S.

    Development of an Ethidium Monoazide-Enhanced Internally Controlled Universal 16S rDNA Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Concentrates. Transfusion 2012, 52 (7), 1423–1432.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Kleinschmidt K.,
    2. Wilkens E.,
    3. Glaeser S. P.,
    4. Kaempfer P.,
    5. Staerk A.,
    6. Roesti D.

    Development of a Qualitative Real-Time PCR for Microbiological Quality Control Testing in Mammalian Cell Culture Production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122 (4), 997–1008.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Putnam N. E.,
    2. Lau A. F.

    Comprehensive Study Identifies a Sensitive, Low-Risk, Closed-System Model for Detection of Fungal Contaminants in Cell and Gene Therapy Products. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59 (11), e0135721.

    OpenUrl