A Rapid Sterility Method Using Solid Phase Cytometry for Cell-Based Preparations and Culture Media and Buffers | PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

References

1.↵
U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <1071> Rapid Sterility Testing of Short-Life Products: A Risk Based Approach. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021.
Google Scholar
2.↵
U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <1223> Validation of Alternative Microbiological Methods. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021
Google Scholar
3.↵
Parenteral Drug Association Inc. Technical Report No. 33: The Evaluation, Validation and Implementation of New Microbiological Testing Methods; Bethesda, MD, 2013.
Google Scholar
4.↵
Council of Europe, Alternative Methods for Control of Microbiological Quality, Chapter 5.1.6. In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10.6 Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2022.
Google Scholar
5.↵
Council of Europe, Microbiological Examination of Cell-Based Preparations, Chapter 2.6.27, In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10.6 Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2022.
Google Scholar
6.↵
U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <71> Sterility Tests. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021.
Google Scholar
7.↵
Council of Europe, Sterility, Chapter 2.6.1, In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10.6 Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2022.
Google Scholar
8.↵
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare of Japan, General Tests, Processes and Apparatus—4.06 Sterility Test. In The Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 16th Edition (English Version), MHLW: Tokyo, 2011.
Google Scholar
9.↵
U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <61> Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests. In USP 44—NF 39, USP: Rockville, MD, 2021.
Google Scholar
10.↵
1. Onadipe A.,
2. Ulvedal K.
A Method for the Rapid Detection of Microbial Contaminants in Animal Cell Culture Processes. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2001, 55 (6), 337–345.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
11.↵
1. Ramond B.,
2. Rolland X.,
3. Planchez C.,
4. Cornet P.,
5. Antoni C.,
6. Drocourt J.-L.
Enumeration of Total Viable Microorganisms in Antibiotic Raw Material Using ChemScan Solid Phase Cytometer. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2000, 54 (4), 320–331.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
12.↵
1. Motulsky H. J.
GraphPad Prism 9 Statistics Guide—Welcome to Prism 9 Statistics Guide and Principles of Statistics—Analysis Checklist: Contingency Tables. https://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/9/statistics/index.htm (accessed February 2, 2021)
Google Scholar
13.↵
1. Hoenig J. M.,
2. Heisey D. M.
The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis. Am. Stat. 2001, 55 (1), 19–24.
OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
14.↵
1. Sun X.,
2. Kurosu S.,
3. Shintani H.
The Expanded Application of the Most Probable Number to the Quantitative Evaluation of Extremely Low Microbial Count. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2006, 60 (2), 124–134.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
15.↵
1. Blodgett R.
Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Appendix 2: Most Probable Number from Serial Dilutions. http://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/laboratorymethods/ucm109656.htm (accessed November 22, 2021).
Google Scholar
16.↵
1. Rasch D.,
2. Herrendörfer G.,
3. Bock J.,
4. Victor N.,
5. Guiard V.
Verfahrensbibliothek—Versuchsplanung und Auswertung; Oldenbourg: Munich, 2000; pp 689–691.
Google Scholar
17.↵
1. Singer D. C.,
2. Roesti D.,
3. Cundell T.,
4. Duguid J.,
5. Tirumalai R.
New USP Microbiology Content Will Support Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacturing. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2021.
Google Scholar
18.↵
1. Smith R.,
2. Von Tress M.,
3. Tubb C.,
4. Vanhaecke E.
Evaluation of the ScanRDI(R) as a Rapid Alternative to the Pharmacopoeial Sterility Test Method: Comparison of the Limits of Detection. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2010, 64 (4), 356–363.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
19.↵
1. McDaniel A.
Microbial Detection in Mammalian Cell Culture Systems. Eur. Pharm. Rev. 2005, 4.
Google Scholar
20.↵
Pharmacopeial Forum 46(6). Chapter <73> ATP Bioluminescence-Based Rapid Microbial Methods for the Release of Short Shelf Life Products. 2020.
Google Scholar
21.↵
1. Gebo J. E. T.,
2. Lau A. F.
Sterility Testing for Cellular Therapies: What is the Role of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58 (7), e01492-19.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
22.↵
1. England M. R.,
2. Stock F.,
3. Gebo J. E. T.,
4. Frank K. M.,
5. Lau A. F.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Compendial USP<71>, BacT/Alert Dual-T, and Bactec FX for Detection of Product Sterility Testing Contaminants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57 (2), e01548-18.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
23.↵
1. Parveen S.,
2. Kaur S.,
3. David S. A.,
4. Kenney J. L.,
5. McCormick W. M.,
6. Gupta R. K.
Evaluation of Growth Based Rapid Microbiological Methods for Sterility Testing of Vaccines and Other Biological Products. Vaccine 2011, 29 (45), 8012–8023.
OpenUrl PubMed Google Scholar
24.↵
1. Patel P.,
2. Garson J. A.,
3. Tettmar K. I.,
4. Ancliff S.,
5. McDonald C.,
6. Pitt T.,
7. Coelho J.,
8. Tedder R. S.
Development of an Ethidium Monoazide-Enhanced Internally Controlled Universal 16S rDNA Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Concentrates. Transfusion 2012, 52 (7), 1423–1432.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
25.↵
1. Kleinschmidt K.,
2. Wilkens E.,
3. Glaeser S. P.,
4. Kaempfer P.,
5. Staerk A.,
6. Roesti D.
Development of a Qualitative Real-Time PCR for Microbiological Quality Control Testing in Mammalian Cell Culture Production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122 (4), 997–1008.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
26.↵
1. Putnam N. E.,
2. Lau A. F.
Comprehensive Study Identifies a Sensitive, Low-Risk, Closed-System Model for Detection of Fungal Contaminants in Cell and Gene Therapy Products. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59 (11), e0135721.
OpenUrl Google Scholar