Abstract
The LAL test has been the “gold standard” for endotoxin testing ever since it was first published as USP Chapter <85> in 1980. Since then, a number of innovative methods have been proposed to augment or replace the LAL test. However novel an alternate test method might be, we must be cognizant of our obligation to patient safety and heed compendial and compliance requirements to demonstrate results equivalence between any candidate (alternate) method and a predicate (compendial) test method. The following discussion explores the concepts of “equivalent”, “different” and “not different”, proposes the use of a two one sided test (TOST) for the demonstration of equivalence and provides examples of calculations using commercially available software to assess data on alternative endotoxins detection methods that have been published in the public domain1
- © PDA, Inc. 2024
PDA members receive access to all articles published in the current year and previous volume year. Institutional subscribers received access to all content. Log in below to receive access to this article if you are either of these.
If you are neither or you are a PDA member trying to access an article outside of your membership license, then you must purchase access to this article (below). If you do not have a username or password for JPST, you will be required to create an account prior to purchasing.
Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only.
Note to pda.org users
The PDA and PDA bookstore websites (www.pda.org and www.pda.org/bookstore) are separate websites from the PDA JPST website. When you first join PDA, your initial UserID and Password are sent to HighWirePress to create your PDA JPST account. Subsequent UserrID and Password changes required at the PDA websites will not pass on to PDA JPST and vice versa. If you forget your PDA JPST UserID and/or Password, you can request help to retrieve UserID and reset Password below.