Abstract
Although 0.1 μm rated filters intended for pharmaceutical sterilization applications have been commercially available for at least 15 years, there is no industry-wide standard for qualifying the microbial removal performance of these filters. In this article, we report on the bacterial challenge methodology used to screen four bacterial species for potential utility as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 μm rated filters. These isolates were, in their natural state, demonstrated to penetrate 0.2/0.22 μm rated filters in prior studies. In the screening challenges described in this study, three out of these four candidates tested demonstrated consistent penetration of one 0.22 μm rated filter type tested (when cultured in a low nutrient medium under standard laboratory conditions). These included 6204-22 (FAME ID Acidovorax avenae citrulli), 6266-15 (FAME ID Comamonas acidovorans), and 6266-34 (FAME ID Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava). Of these, H. pseudoflava (6266-34) was chosen for additional experiments with other 0.2 μm rated filter membranes. In total, seventeen 0.2 and 0.22 μm rated filter discs, spanning five different “sterilizing grade” filter types from three different filter manufacturers were tested. H. pseudoflava penetration was observed for every filter tested. Under the same challenge conditions, H. pseudoflava was consistently retained by a 0.1 μm rated hydrophilic PVDF (polyvinylidenefluoride) filter with a specified high titer reduction claim for Acholeplasma laidlawii. In order to ensure selection of the most stable penetrative phenotype (i.e., select for non-revertants), H. pseudoflava was subjected to three rounds of “filter cloning,” and these results are described herein. The advantages of using H. pseudoflava for qualifying the microbial removal performance of 0.1 μm rated filters are also discussed.
Footnotes
↵1Current affiliation: Immuno-Rx, New York
- Copyright © Parenteral Drug Association. All rights reserved.
PDA members receive access to all articles published in the current year and previous volume year. Institutional subscribers received access to all content. Log in below to receive access to this article if you are either of these.
If you are neither or you are a PDA member trying to access an article outside of your membership license, then you must purchase access to this article (below). If you do not have a username or password for JPST, you will be required to create an account prior to purchasing.
Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only.
Note to pda.org users
The PDA and PDA bookstore websites (www.pda.org and www.pda.org/bookstore) are separate websites from the PDA JPST website. When you first join PDA, your initial UserID and Password are sent to HighWirePress to create your PDA JPST account. Subsequent UserrID and Password changes required at the PDA websites will not pass on to PDA JPST and vice versa. If you forget your PDA JPST UserID and/or Password, you can request help to retrieve UserID and reset Password below.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Purchase access
patientACCESS
In This Issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters
- The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters--Part I
- Use of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava Penetration To Quantitatively Assess the Impact of Filtration Parameters for 0.2-Micrometer-Pore-Size Filters