Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Review ArticleReview

Particulate Matter in Injectable Drug Products

Stephen E. Langille
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology May 2013, 67 (3) 186-200; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00922
Stephen E. Langille
Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Bldg. 51, Rm. 4158 Silver Spring, MD 20993
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Stephen.Langille@fda.hhs.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bartecchi C. E.
    Intravenous therapy: from humble beginnings through 150 years. South. Med. J. 1982, 75, 61–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    American Hospital Association Hospital Statistics, 2011.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pesko L. J.
    Physiological Consequences of Injected Particulates. In Liquid and Surface Borne Particle Measurement Handbook; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 1996; pp 661–686.
  4. 4.↵
    USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections. USP 35; U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention: Rockville, MD, 2012; pp 339–342.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Groves M. J.
    Parenteral Products; Hindemann Medical Books, Ltd.: London, 1973.
  6. 6.↵
    USP <1788> Methods for the Determination of Particulate Matter in Injections and Ophthalmic Solutions. 2102. USP 35. pp. 945–954.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Nema S.,
    2. Ludwig J. D.
    1. Aldrich D. S.
    Chapter 5. Particulate Matter: Sub-Visible. In Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications; Nema S., Ludwig J. D., Eds. Third ed. Volume 2, Informa Healthcare, New York NY 2010, 114–145.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Barber Thomas.
    Chapter 7. Visual Inspection of Injectables and Devices. In Control of Particulate Matter: Contamination in Healthcare Manufacturing; Interpharm Press: Buffalo Grove, IL, 2000; pp 229–274.
  9. 9.↵
    USP <1790> Visual Inspection of Injectable Products for Particulates. In preparation.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Falchuk Kenneth H.,
    2. Peterson Lynn,
    3. McNeil Barbara J.
    . Macroparticle-Induced Phlebitis: Its Prevention by In-Line Filtration. New Engl. J. Med. 1985, 312 (2), 78–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tran T.,
    2. Kupiec T. C.,
    3. Trissel L. A.
    Particulate matter in injections: What is it and what are the concerns? International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding 2006, 10 (3), 202–204.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gurgvich I.
    Letter to the Editor. New Engl. J. Med. 1985, 312 (22), 1453.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kirkpatrick C. J.,
    2. Rangoonwala R.
    Originator antibiotic or generic in clinical practice. J. Appl. Ther. Res. 2009, 7, 52–57.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hill S. E.,
    2. Heldman L. S.,
    3. Goo E. D.,
    4. Whippo P. E.,
    5. Perkinson J. C.
    Fatal microvascular pulmonary emboli from precipitation of a total nutrient admixture solution. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 1996, 20 (1), 81–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Schaefer S. C.,
    2. Bison P. A.,
    3. Rangoonwala R.,
    4. Kirckpatrick C. J.,
    5. Lehr H. A.
    0.2 um in-line filters prevent capillary obstruction by particulate contamination of generic antibiotic preparations in postischemic muscle. Chemother. J. 2008, 17, 172–178.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Illum L.,
    2. Davis S. S.,
    3. Wilson C. G.,
    4. Thomas N. W.,
    5. Frier M.,
    6. Hardy J. G.
    Blood clearance and organ deposition of intravenously administered colloidal particles. The effects of particle size nature and shape. Int. J. Pharm. 1982, 12 (2-3), 135–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Malizia A. A. Jr..,
    2. Reiman H. M.,
    3. Myers R. P.,
    4. Sande J. R.,
    5. Barham S. S.,
    6. Benson R. C. Jr..,
    7. Dewanjee M. K.,
    8. Utz W. J.
    Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1984, 251 (24), 3277–3281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jack T.,
    2. Brent B. E.,
    3. Boehne M.,
    4. Muller M.,
    5. Sewald K.,
    6. Braun A.,
    7. Wessel A.,
    8. Sasse M.
    Analysis of particulate contaminations of infusion solutions in a pediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2010, 36 (4), 707–711.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Winding O.,
    2. Gronvall J.,
    3. Faarup P.,
    4. Hegedus V.
    Sequelae of intrinsic foreign-body contamination during selective renal angiography in rabbits. Radiology 1980, 134 (2), 321–326.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Shay D. K.,
    2. Fann L. M.,
    3. Jarvis W. R.
    Respiratory distress and sudden death associated with receipt of a peripheral parenteral nutrition admixture. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1997, 18 (12), 814–817.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bradley J. S.,
    2. Wassel R. T.,
    3. Lee L.,
    4. Nambiar S.
    Intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium in the neonate: assessing the risk for cardiopulmonary adverse events. Pediatrics 2009, 123 (4), 609–613.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Cant A. J.,
    2. Lenney W.,
    3. Kirkham N.
    Plastic material from a syringe causing fatal bowel necrosis in a neonate. Br. Med. J. 1988, 296 (6627), 968–969.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Barber T.
    Chapter 1. Introduction and Overview. In Control of Particulate Matter: Contamination in Healthcare Manufacturing; Interpharm Press: Buffalo Grove, IL, 2000; pp 1–26.
  24. 24.↵
    1. MacMahon P. J.,
    2. Eustace S. J.,
    3. Kavanagh E. C.
    Injectable corticosteroid and local anesthetic preparations: a review for radiologists. Radiology 2009, 252 (3), 647–661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Okubadejo G. O.,
    2. Talcott M. R.,
    3. Schmidt R. E.,
    4. Sharma A.,
    5. Patel A. A.,
    6. Mackey R. B.,
    7. Guarino A. H.,
    8. Moran C. J.,
    9. Riew K. D.
    Perils of intravascular methylprednisolone injection into the vertebral srtery. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2008, 90 (9), 1932–1938.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2), 2009.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kanke M.,
    2. Simmons G. H.,
    3. Weiss D. L.,
    4. Bivins B. A.,
    5. DeLuca P. P.
    Clearance of 141C3-labeled microspheres from blood and distribution in specific organs following intravenous and intraarterial administration in beagle dogs. J. Pharm. Sci. 1980, 69 (7), 755–762.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Intravenous ceftriaxone (marketed As Rocephin and generics) and calcium drug–drug interaction. FDA Drug Safety Newsletter 2009, 2 (3), 24–25.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. McKinnon B. T.
    FDA safety alert: hazards of precipitation associated with parenteral nutrition. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 1996, 11 (2), 1427–1428.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Backhouse C. M.,
    2. Ball P. R.,
    3. Booth S.,
    4. Kelshaw M.,
    5. Potter S. R.,
    6. McCollum C. N.
    Particulate contaminants of intravenous medications and infuaions. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1987, 39:241–245.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Puntis J. W.,
    2. Wilkins K. M.,
    3. Ball P. A.,
    4. Rushton D. I.,
    5. Booth I. W.
    Hazards of parenteral treatment: Do particles count? Arch. Dis. Child. 1992, 67 (12), 1475–1477.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Van Lingen R. A.,
    2. Baerts W.,
    3. Marquering A. C. M.,
    4. Ruijs G. J. H. M.
    . The use of in-line intravenous filters in sick newborn infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004, 93 (5), 658–662.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Niël-Weise B. S.,
    2. Stijnen T.,
    3. van den Broek P. J.
    Should in-line filters be used in peripheral intravenous catheters to prevent infusion-related phlebitis? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth. Analg. 2010, 110 (6), 1624–1629.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Walpot H.,
    2. Franke R. P.,
    3. Burchard W. G.,
    4. Agternkamp C.,
    5. Müller F. G.,
    6. Mittermayer C.,
    7. Kalff G.
    Particulate contamination of intravenous solutions and drug additives during long-term Intensive therapy. 1. Energy dispersion electron images in the scanning electron microscope-REM/EDX. Anaesthesist 1989, 38 (10), 544–548.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. van den Hoogen A.,
    2. Krediet T. G.,
    3. Uiterwaal C. S.,
    4. Bolenius J. F.,
    5. Gerards L. J.,
    6. Fleer A.
    In-line filters in central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Perinat. Med. 2006, 34 (1), 71–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Oie S.,
    2. Kamiya A.
    Particulate and microbial contamination in in-use admixed parenteral nutrition solutions. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28 (12), 2268–2270.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Newton D. W.,
    2. Driscoll D. F.
    Calcium and phosphate compatibility: revisited again. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2008, 65 (1), 73–80.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Zabir A. F.,
    2. Choy C. Y.,
    3. Bushdan R.
    Glass particle contamination of parenteral preparations of intravenous drugs in anaesthetic practice. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2008, 14 (3), 17–19.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Lye S. T.,
    2. Hwang N. C.
    Glass particle contamination: Is it here to stay? Anesthesia 2003, 58 (1), 93–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Diebold,
    2. Kristie J.
    Pre-testing for delamination in pharmaceutical vials. Healthcare Packaging 2009. Available at www.healthcare-packaging.com/archives/2009/09/pre-testing_for_delamination_i.php.
  41. 41.↵
    FDA. Enforcement Reports. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/EnforcementReports/default.htm
  42. 42.↵
    1. Yorioka K.,
    2. Oie S.,
    3. Oomaki M.,
    4. Imamura A.,
    5. Kamiya A.
    Particulate and microbial contamination in in-use admixed intravenous infusions. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29 (11), 2321–2323.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Stellmack M.,
    2. Rhodes K.
    Contamination control—metal particles. Meddling metals can contaminate biopharmaceuticals. December/January 2011. Available at www.pharmquality.com.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Stellmack M.,
    2. Rhodes K.
    Metal contamination in bio-pharmaceutical drugs: solving a puzzle without all the pieces. October 2010. Available at www.contractpharma.com.
  45. 45.↵
    1. Popińska K.,
    2. Kierkuś J.,
    3. Lyszkowska M.,
    4. Socha J.,
    5. Pietraszek E.,
    6. Kmiotek W.,
    7. Ksiazyk J.
    Aluminum contamination of parenteral nutrition additives, amino acid solutions, and lipid emulsions. Nutrition 1999, 15 (9), 683–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Sedman A. B.,
    2. Klein G. L.,
    3. Merritt R. J.,
    4. Miller N. L.,
    5. Weber K. O.,
    6. W. L.,
    7. Gill H.,
    8. Anand H.,
    9. Alfrey A. C.
    Evidence of aluminum loading in infants teceiving intravenous therapy. New Engl. J. Med. 1985, 312 (21), 1337–1343.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    FDA. Aluminum in large and small volume parenterals used in total parenteral nutrition. Federal Register 2000, 65 (17), 4103–4111.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    FDA Warning Letter 10-ATL-12. April 12, 2010.
  49. 49.↵
    1. Carpenter J. F.,
    2. Randolph T. W.,
    3. Jiskoot W.,
    4. Crommelin D. J.,
    5. Middaugh C. R.,
    6. Winter G.,
    7. Fan Y. X.,
    8. Kirshner S.,
    9. Verthelyi D.,
    10. Kozlowski S.,
    11. Clouse K. A.,
    12. Swann P. G.,
    13. Rosenberg A.,
    14. Cherney B.
    Overlooking subvisible particles in therapeutic protein products: gaps that may compromise product quality. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 98 (4), 1201–1205.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Giezen T. J.,
    2. Mantel-Teeuwisse A. K.,
    3. Straus S. M.,
    4. Schellekens H.,
    5. Leufkens H. G.,
    6. Egberts A. C.
    Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals approved in the United States and the European Union. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2008, 300 (16), 1887–1895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Singh S. K.,
    2. Afonina N.,
    3. Awwad M.,
    4. Bechtold-Peters K.,
    5. Blue J. T.,
    6. Chou D.,
    7. Cromwell M.,
    8. Krause H. J.,
    9. Mahler H. C.,
    10. Meyer B. K.,
    11. Narhi L.,
    12. Nesta D. P.,
    13. Spitznagel T.
    An industry perspective on the monitoring of subvisible particles as a quality attribute for protein therapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99 (8), 3302–3321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Das T.,
    2. Nema S.
    Protein particulate issues in biologics development. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2008, 11 (4), 52–57.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Krebs M. R. H.,
    2. Devlin G. L.,
    3. Donald A. M.
    Protein particulates: another generic form of protein aggregation? Biophys. J. 2007, 92 (4), 1336–1342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Driscoll D. F.
    Medical Impact on Particle Size. Presentation at the USP Workshop on Particle Size. Rockville, MD, December 8–10, 2010.
  55. 55.↵
    1. Driscoll D. F.,
    2. Ling P. R.,
    3. Andersson C.,
    4. Bistrian B. R.
    Hepatic indicators of oxidative stress and tissue damage accompanied by systemic Inflammation in rats following a 24-hour infusion of an unstable lipid emulsion admixture. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 2009, 33 (3), 327–335.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Lehr H.-A.,
    2. Brunner J.,
    3. Rangoonwala R.,
    4. Kirkpatrick C. J.
    Particulate matter contamination of intravenous antibiotics aggravates loss of functional capillary density in postischemic striated muscle. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 165 (4), 514–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Brauser,
    2. Deborah
    . Inline filtration may reduce SIRS mortality in the pediatric ICU. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/715108. January 14, 2010.
  58. 58.↵
    1. Madsen R. E.,
    2. Cherris R.,
    3. Shabushnig J.,
    4. Hunt D.
    Visible particulates in injections—a history and a proposal to revise USP General Chapter Injections <1>. Pharmacop. Forum 2009, 35 (5), 1383–1387.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    USP <790> Visible particulates in injections. Pharmacop. Forum 2012, 38 (2). Online
  60. 60.↵
    1. Nath N.,
    2. McNeal E.,
    3. Obenhuber D.,
    4. Pillari B.,
    5. Shelton L.,
    6. Stevens-Riley M.,
    7. Sweeney N.
    Particulate contaminants of intravenous medication and the limits set by USP General Chapter <788>. Pharmacop. Forum 2004, 30 (6), 2272–2280.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    USP <787> Subvisible particulate matter in therapeutic protein injections. Pharmacop. Forum 2012, 38 (3). Online.
  62. 62.↵
    1. Gallelli J. F.,
    2. Groves M. J.
    USP perspectives on particle contamination of injectable products. J. Parenter. Sci. Technol. 1993, 47 (6), 289–292.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 67 (3)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 67, Issue 3
May/June 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Particulate Matter in Injectable Drug Products
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Particulate Matter in Injectable Drug Products
Stephen E. Langille
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology May 2013, 67 (3) 186-200; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00922

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Particulate Matter in Injectable Drug Products
Stephen E. Langille
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology May 2013, 67 (3) 186-200; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00922
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Classification and Sources of Particulate Matter
    • Clinical Effects of Injected Particulate Matter
    • Relevant Regulations and Standards
    • Continuing Efforts
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Identification and Root Cause Analysis of the Visible Particles Commonly Encountered in the Biopharmaceutical Industry
  • Best Practices to Quantify and Identify Particulate Matter on the Interior Surfaces of Single-Use Systems
  • Development and Qualification of Visible Particle Load Analysis Methods for Injectable Drug Product Primary Packaging Components
  • Tornado-inspired acoustic vortex tweezer for trapping and manipulating microbubbles
  • Visible Particulate Contamination Control for Injectable Products: A Life-Cycle Approach
  • Micro-Flow Imaging: Estimation of the Contribution of Key Factors to the Variability of Subvisible Particle Count Measurement by a Nested Statistical Analysis
  • Development of Protein-Like Reference Material for Semiquantitatively Monitoring Visible Proteinaceous Particles in Biopharmaceuticals
  • Achieving "Zero" Defects for Visible Particles in Injectables
  • Particulate Generation Mechanisms during Bulk Filling and Mitigation via New Glass Vial
  • Particulate Study on NeoProfen, a Neonatal Injectable Product
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification: A Journey Toward the Challenges and Benefits of AI in the Biopharmaceutical Industry
  • A Risk Assessment and Risk-Based Approach Review of Pre-Use/Post-Sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT)
  • A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Product Life Cycle Management
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Injectable
  • Parenteral
  • Particulate matter
  • Pharmaceutical quality
  • Current good manufacturing practice (cGMP)

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire