Microscopic Characterization of Brevundimonas diminuta in the Hydrated State

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bowman F. W.,
   2. Calhoun M. P.,
   3. White M.

   Microbiological methods for quality control of membrane filters. J. Pharm. Sci. 1967, 56 (2), 222–225.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   ASTM F838-05. Standard Test Method for Determining Bacterial Retention of Membrane Filters Utilized for Liquid Filtration. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, DOI: 10.1520/F0838-05, www.astm.org.
3. 3.↵
   Parenteral Drug Association (PDA). PDA Technical Report No. 26. Sterilizing filtration of liquids. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 1998, 52 (Suppl. 1).
4. 4.↵
   1. Howard G. W.,
   2. Holthausen R. H.,
   3. MacCarter G.

   A simple membrane fixation technique for the SEM examination of bacteria from in vivo and in vitro sources. Am. Soc. Microbiol. Abstr. 1979.
5. 5.↵
   1. Leahy T. J.

   Validation of Bacterial Retention by Membrane Filtration: A Proposed Approach for Determining Sterility Assurance. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, February 1983, pp 90–91.
6. 6.↵
   1. Leahy T. J.,
   2. Sullivan M. J.

   Validation of bacterial retention capabilities of membrane filters. Pharm. Technol. 1978, 2 (11), 65–75.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Reti A. R.,
   2. Leahy T. J.

   Filter validation. III. Validation of bacterially retentive filters by bacterial passage testing. J. Parenter. Drug Assoc. 1979, 33 (5), 257–272.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Fennington G. J.,
   2. Howard G.

   Preparation and evaluation of bacterial stocks for filter validation. PDA J. Pharm Sci. Technol. 1997, 51 (4), 153–156.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Madsen L. M.,
   2. Seves M. F.,
   3. Howard G. W.

   Scanning electron and atomic force microscopy for the sizing of bacterial populations. Eur. J. Parenter. Sci. 2001, 6 (1), 27–30.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Han G.,
    2. Levy R.,
    3. Carter J.

    A Comparison of Microbial Cell Sizing Technologies. In Proceedings from the 2001 PDA International Conference, February 20, 2001, Kyoto, Japan.
11. 11.↵
    1. Lee S.-H.,
    2. Lee S.-S.,
    3. Kim C.

    Changes in the cell size of B. diminuta using different growth agitation rates. PDA J. Pharm Sci. Technol. 2002, 56 (2), 99–108.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Bolshakova A. V.,
    2. Kiselyova O. I.,
    3. Yaminsky I. V.

    Microbial surfaces investigated using atomic force microscopy. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20 (6), 1615–1622.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Berquand A.

    Technical Note No. 135. Quantitative Imaging of Living Biological Samples by PeakForce QNM Atomic Force Microscopy. Bruker Nanosurfaces Division website: http://www.bruker-axs.com/application_notes/AN135.pdf (accessed August 7, 2012).
14. 14.↵
    1. Pletikapić G.,
    2. Berquand A.,
    3. Radić T. M.,
    4. Svetličić V.

    Quantitative nanomechanical mapping of marine diatom in seawater using peak force tapping atomic force microscopy. J. Phycology 2012, 48 (1), 174–185.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Ozmen M.,
    2. Can K.,
    3. Akin I.,
    4. Arslan G.,
    5. Tor A.,
    6. Cengeloglu Y.,
    7. Ersoz M.

    Surface modification of glass beads with glutaraldehyde: characterization and their adsorption property for metal ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171 (1-3), 594–600.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sieracki M. E.,
    2. Viles C. L.,
    3. Webb K. L.

    Algorithm to estimate cell biovolume using image analyzed microscopy. Cytometry 1989, 10 (5), 551–557.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Kuznetsova T. G.,
    2. Starodubtseva M. N.,
    3. Yegorenkov N. I.,
    4. Chizhik S. A.,
    5. Zhdanov R. I.

    Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity. Micron 2007, 38 (8), 824–833.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Laurent V. M.,
    2. Kasas S.,
    3. Yersin A.,
    4. Schäffer T. E.,
    5. Catsicas S.,
    6. Dietler G.,
    7. Verkhovsky A. B.,
    8. Meister J. J.

    Gradient of rigidity in the lamellipodia of migrating cells revealed by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 2005, 89 (1), 667–675.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Dombrowski C.,
    2. Kan W.,
    3. Motaleb A.,
    4. Charon W.,
    5. Goldstein R. E.,
    6. Wolgemuth C. W.

    The elastic basis for the shape of Borrelia burgdorferi. Biophys. J. 2009, 96 (11), 4409–4417.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Jornitz M. W.,
    2. Akers J. E.,
    3. Agalloco J. P.,
    4. Madsen R. E.,
    5. Meltzer T. H.

    Considerations in sterile filtration. Part I: The changed role of integrity testing. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2002, 56 (1), 4–10.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Osumi M.,
    2. Yamada N.,
    3. Toya M.

    Bacterial retention mechanisms of membrane filters. PDA J. Pharm Sci. Technol. 1996, 50 (1), 30–34.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Mittelman M. W.,
    2. Jornitz M. W,
    3. Meltzer T. H.

    Bacterial cell size and surface charge characteristics relevant to filter validation studies. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 1998, 52 (1), 37–42.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Lebleu N.,
    2. Causserand C.,
    3. Roques C.,
    4. Aimar P.

    Potable Water Production by Membrane Processes: Effect of Bacterial Deformation on Microorganisms' Removal. 10th World Filtration Congress, 2008, pp 64–68.
24. 24.↵
    1. Lebleu N.

    Desinfection des Eaux par Procedes Membranaires: Etude des Mecanismes de Transfert des Bacteries. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toulose, Tolouse, France, November 15, 2007, pp 165–201.
25. 25.↵
    1. Hochmuth R. M.

    Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J. Biomech. 2000, 33 (1), 15–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Lima C. T.,
    2. Zhoua E. H.,
    3. Quek S. T.

    Mechanical models for living cells—a review. J. Biomech. 2006, 39 (2), 195–216.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Theret D. P.,
    2. Levesque M. J.,
    3. Sato M.,
    4. Nerem R. M.,
    5. Wheeler L. T.

    The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. J. Biomech. Eng. 1998, 110 (3), 190–199.

    OpenUrl