Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring

Marcel Goverde, Julian Willrodt and Alexandra Staerk
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology January 2017, 71 (1) 33-42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783
Marcel Goverde
aMGP Consulting GmbH, Binningen, Switzerland and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: goverde@mgp-consulting.ch
Julian Willrodt
bMicrobiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Staerk
bMicrobiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Contact plates, dipslides, and swabs are used for the microbiological monitoring of surfaces in controlled environments such as pharmaceutical clean rooms. In the present study, three different swab types using two different methods (direct streaking on agar versus elution followed by membrane filtration) were evaluated. In a first study, representative surfaces in pharmaceutical clean rooms were artificially inoculated using three different environmental strains (in vitro study). In a second study, a naturally inoculated floor was swabbed with the same three swab types, again using the two different recovery methods (in situ study). With the in vitro study, clear differences were found between the three swab types as well as between the two recovery methods. In addition, recovery rate of the swab type was dependent on the recovery method (interactive effect). One swab type showed a higher recovery rate with direct streaking on agar, while the other swab type showed better results using the elution/membrane filtration method. This difference can be explained by the fact that both swabs were each developed for their specific application. The type of surface also had a highly significant effect on the recovery rates. Recovery on stainless steel was better than for the other surfaces, while lexan had the lowest recovery rate. From the three different strains applied in the in vitro study, Micrococcus luteus had significantly higher recovery results compared to the other two strains (Bacillus thuringiensis, Aspergillus brasiliensis). The differences in recovery between the swab type and recovery method were less pronounced in the in situ study. In particular, the recovery of the swab type depending on the recovery method was not found. In conclusion, if swabs are to be used for environmental monitoring, their suitability should first be evaluated. This can be approached with artificially inoculated surfaces. However, naturally inoculated surfaces might be more realistic and might better reflect what is found in pharmaceutical clean rooms.

LAY ABSTRACT: Environmental microbiological monitoring provides information on the hygiene condition of pharmaceutical clean rooms and equipment for manufacturing of drug products. Different methods can be used to recover microorganisms. For surfaces, normally contact plates (e.g., RODAC or dipslides) are used; however, when surfaces are uneven, swabs should be used. In the present study three different swabs were evaluated for their ability to recover microorganisms from different surfaces. Thereby two methods and two approaches were evaluated. Swab samples were either directly stroked on agar or the swab was eluted, membrane-filtrated, and the filter placed on an agar plate. Experimentally, artificial inoculated surfaces typically found in clean rooms (in vitro study) and naturally inoculated floors (in situ study) were sampled. Thus with this approach the most convenient swab and the most suitable recovery methods under laboratory as well as real clean room conditions were evaluated. With this set-up, we found the most suitable swab for our environmental monitoring not only by using artificial inoculated surfaces but also under more realistic clean room conditions, which is most important for microbiological environmental monitoring sampling.

  • Microbiological environmental monitoring
  • Recovery rate
  • Swab
  • Membrane filtration
  • Streak on agar
  • In situ study

Footnotes

  • ↵3 e-mail: alexandra.staerk{at}novartis.com

  • © PDA, Inc. 2017
View Full Text

PDA members receive access to all articles published in the current year and previous volume year. Institutional subscribers received access to all content. Log in below to receive access to this article if you are either of these.  

If you are neither or you are a PDA member trying to access an article outside of your membership license, then you must purchase access to this article (below). If you do not have a username or password for JPST, you will be required to create an account prior to purchasing. 

Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only.

Note to pda.org users

The PDA and PDA bookstore websites (www.pda.org and www.pda.org/bookstore) are separate websites from the PDA JPST website. When you first join PDA, your initial UserID and Password are sent to HighWirePress to create your PDA JPST account. Subsequent UserrID and Password changes required at the PDA websites will not pass on to PDA JPST and vice versa. If you forget your PDA JPST UserID and/or Password, you can request help to retrieve UserID and reset Password below.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles

Full issue PDFs are for PDA members only. You can join PDA at www.pda.org. 

PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 71 (1)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 71, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring
Marcel Goverde, Julian Willrodt, Alexandra Staerk
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jan 2017, 71 (1) 33-42; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring
Marcel Goverde, Julian Willrodt, Alexandra Staerk
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jan 2017, 71 (1) 33-42; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Methods
    • 3. Results
    • 4. Discussion
    • 5. Conclusion
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part A: methods for the determination of the surface bioburden on ampoules and vials
  • Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part C: evaluation and redesign of the transfer process
  • A Novel Method for Sampling and Long-Term Monitoring of Microbes That Uses Stickers of Plain Paper
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Container Closure Integrity of Vial Primary Packaging Systems under Frozen Storage Conditions: A Case Study
  • Advances in Large Volume Subcutaneous Injections: A Pilot Tolerability Study of an Innovative Needle-Free Injection Platform
  • Quantification and Stability Impact Assessment of Drop Stresses in Biologic Drug Products
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • microbiological environmental monitoring
  • recovery rate
  • swab
  • membrane filtration
  • streak on agar
  • in situ study

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2023 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology ISSN: 1079-7440

Powered by HighWire