Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring

Marcel Goverde, Julian Willrodt and Alexandra Staerk
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology January 2017, 71 (1) 33-42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783
Marcel Goverde
aMGP Consulting GmbH, Binningen, Switzerland and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: goverde@mgp-consulting.ch
Julian Willrodt
bMicrobiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Staerk
bMicrobiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Seyfarth H.
    Mikrobiologisches Monitoring. Teil 3: Methoden und Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Qualität der Luft. Pharmazeutische Industrie, 2010, 72 (2), 310–322.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Parenteral Drug Association. Technical Report No. 13, Revised. Fundamentals of an Environmental Monitoring Program. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2014, Supplement TR13, 55 (5), 19–20.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry—Sterile Products Produced by Aseptic Processing—Current Manufacturing Practice, 2004.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ljungqvist B.,
    2. Reinmüller B.
    Airborne Viable Particles and Total Number of Airborne Particles: Comparative Studies of Active Air Sampling. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2000, 54 (2), 112–116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Beckmann G.
    Mikrobiologisches Monitoring auf dem Prüfstand. Pharmazeutische Industrie 2015, 77 (10), 1525–1528.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Angelotti R.,
    2. Wilson J. L.,
    3. Litsky W.,
    4. Walter W. G.
    Comparative Evaluation of the Cotton Swab and Rodac Methods for the Recovery of Bacillus subtilis Spore Contamination from Stainless Steel Surfaces. Health Lab. Sci. 1964, 1 (4), 289–296.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rose L.,
    2. Jensen B.,
    3. Peterson A.,
    4. Banerjee S. N.,
    5. Arduino M. J.
    Swab Materials and Bacillus anthracis Spore Recovery from Nonporous Surfaces. Emerg. Infect. Diseases 2004, 10 (6), 1023–1029.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Seyfahrt H.
    Mikrobiologisches Monitoring. Teil 5: Oberflächen/Personal: Methoden. Pharmazeutische Industrie 2010, 72 (4), 713–724.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    USP 39, NF 33 <1116>. Microbiological Control and Monitoring of Aspetic Processing Environments.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mahony J. B.,
    2. Chernesky M. A.
    Effect of Swab Type and Storage Temperature on the Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from Clinical Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1985, 22 (5), 865–867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Österblad M.,
    2. Järvinen H. J.,
    3. Lönnqvist K.,
    4. Huikko S.,
    5. Laippala P.,
    6. Viljanto J.,
    7. Arvilommi H.,
    8. Huovinen P.
    Evaluation of a New Cellulose Sponge-tipped Swab for Microbiological Sampling: A Laboratory and Clinical Investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41 (5), 1894–1900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dalmaso G.,
    2. Bini M.,
    3. Paroni R.,
    4. Ferrari M.
    Validation of the New Irradiated Nylon™ Flocked QUANTISWAB™ for the Quantitative Recovery of Micro-organisms in Critical Clean Room Environments. PDA J. Sci. Technol. 2008, 62 (3), 191–199.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Van Horn K. G.,
    2. Audette C. D.,
    3. Tucker K. A.,
    4. Sebeck D.
    Comparison of 3 Swab Transport Systems for Direct Release and Recovery of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008, 62 (4), 471–473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gordon O.,
    2. Berchtold M.,
    3. Staerk A.,
    4. Roesti D.
    Comparison of Different Incubation Conditions for Microbiological Environmental Monitoring. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2014, 68 (5), 394–406.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Sandle T.
    Examination of the Order of Incubation for the Recovery of Bacteria and Fungi from Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms. Int. J. Pharm. Compd. 2014, 18 (3), 242–247.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Crawley M. J.
    GLIM for Ecologists; Blackwell: Oxford, 1993.
  17. 17.↵
    USP 39, NF 33 <61>. Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests.
  18. 18.↵
    USP 39, NF 33 <1227>. Validation of Microbiological Recovery from Pharmacopeial Articles.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hedin G.,
    2. Rynbäck J.,
    3. Loré B.
    New Technique to Take Samples from Environmental Surfaces Using Flocked Nylon Swabs. J. Hosp. Infect. 2010, 75, 314–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Probst A.,
    2. Facius R.,
    3. Wirth R.,
    4. Moissl-Eichinger C.
    Validation of a Nylon-Flocked-Swab Protocol for Efficient Recovery of Bacterial Spores from Smooth and Rough Surfaces. App. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76 (15), 5148–5158.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Maunz U.,
    2. Kanz E.
    Beiträge zur Quantitativen Auswertung von Abklatschkulturen. Gesundheitswesen und Desinfektion 1969, 61 (9), 129–143.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    1. Goverde M.,
    2. Erhardt A.,
    3. Nicklaus P. A.
    In Situ Development of a Satyrid Butterfly on Calcareous Grassland Exposed to Elevated Carbon Dioxide. Ecol. 2002, 83 (5), 1399–1411.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.
    1. Yamayoshi T.,
    2. Doi H.,
    3. Tatsumi N.
    Surface Sampling Using a Single Swab Method. J. Hosp. Infect. 1984, 5 (4), 386–390.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 71 (1)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 71, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring
Marcel Goverde, Julian Willrodt, Alexandra Staerk
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jan 2017, 71 (1) 33-42; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring
Marcel Goverde, Julian Willrodt, Alexandra Staerk
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jan 2017, 71 (1) 33-42; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Methods
    • 3. Results
    • 4. Discussion
    • 5. Conclusion
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part C: evaluation and redesign of the transfer process
  • Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part A: methods for the determination of the surface bioburden on ampoules and vials
  • A Novel Method for Sampling and Long-Term Monitoring of Microbes That Uses Stickers of Plain Paper
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Holistic Approach for Filling Volume Variability Evaluation and Control with Statistical Tool
  • A Proof-of-Concept Study on a Universal Standard Kit to Evaluate the Risks of Inspectors for Their Foundational Ability of Visual Inspection of Injectable Drug Products
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Microorganism Profile Identified in Bioburden Analysis in a Biopharmaceutical Facility in Brazil: Criteria for Classification and Management of Results
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • microbiological environmental monitoring
  • recovery rate
  • swab
  • membrane filtration
  • streak on agar
  • in situ study

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire