Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Case ReportCase Studies

A QRM Discussion of Microbial Contamination of Non-sterile Drug Products, Using FDA and EMA Warning Letters Recorded between 2008 and 2016

Ana M. C. Santos, Mara S. Doria, Luís Meirinhos-Soares, António J. Almeida and José C. Menezes
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology January 2018, 72 (1) 62-72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2016.007252
Ana M. C. Santos
1Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mara S. Doria
1Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luís Meirinhos-Soares
3INFARMED Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento, Av. do Brasil 53, 1749-004 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
António J. Almeida
1Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José C. Menezes
2Institute for Biotechnology and Biosciences – Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1 – 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bsel@Tecnico.ULisboa.pt
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    1. Denyer S. P.,
    2. Hodges N. A.,
    3. Gorman S. P.
    1. Baird R.
    Microbial Spoilage, Infection Risk and Contamination Control. In Hugo and Russell's Pharmaceutical Microbiology; Denyer S. P., Hodges N. A., Gorman S. P., Eds., 7th ed; Blackwell: Malden, MA, 2004; Vol. 16, pp 263–284.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Grady D.
    The Epidemiology of Drug Recalls. American Medical Association 2012, 172 (14), 1109–1110.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sutton S.,
    2. Jimenez L. A.
    Review of Reported Recalls Involving Microbiological Control 2004–2011 with Emphasis on FDA Considerations of “Objectionable Organisms”. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2012, 15 (1), 1–12.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cheah E. T.,
    2. Chan W. Li.,
    3. Chieng C. L.
    L. The Corporate Social Responsibility of Pharmaceutical Product Recalls: An Empirical Examination of U.S. and U.K. Markets. J. Business Ethics 2007, 76 (4), 427–449.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Stewart K. L.,
    2. Whiton S. P.
    Johnson and Johnson: An Ethical Analysis of Broken Trust. J. Academic and Business Ethics 2012, 5 (7), 1–10.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    EMA. EudraGMDP. European Medicines Agency. http://eudragmdp.ema.europa.eu/inspections/logonGeneralPublic.do.
  7. 7.↵
    FDA. Warning Letters. US Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/RegulatoryProceduresManual/.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Banaitiene N.
    1. Botet J.
    Quality Risk Analysis: Value for Money in the Pharmaceutical Industry. In Risk Management—Current Issues and Challenges; Banaitiene N., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; Vol. 17, pp 388–410.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. O'Donnell K.
    QRM in the GMP Environment: Ten Years On—Are Medicines Any Safer Now? A Regulators Perspective. Institute Validation Technol. 2015, 21 (4), 1–12.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    European Commission. EU Pharmaceutical Information. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/eudralex/vol-4/index_en.htm.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Waldron K.
    Risk Analysis and Ordinal Risk Rating Scales—A Closer Look. Institute of Validation Technol. 2015, 21 (6), 1–6.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ishikawa K.
    Guide to Quality Control—Industrial Engineering and Technology, 2nd ed.; Asian Productivity Organization: Tokyo, Japan, 1976.
  13. 13.↵
    ICH Q9. Quality Risk Management. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. November 2005. http://www.ich.org.
  14. 14.↵
    IEC. IEC/ISO 31010—Risk Management—Risk Assessment Techniques. International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, 2008.
  15. 15.↵
    WHO. WHO Guideline on Quality Risk Management. World Health Organization. October 2010. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/QualityRiskManagement_QAS10-376Rev2_27082012.pdf.
  16. 16.↵
    INFARMED. Acordos de Colaboração. INFARMED Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de saúde. http://www.infarmed.pt/portal/page/portal/SOBRE_O_INFARMED/RELACOES_INTERNACIONAIS/ACORDOS/Acordo%20Parceria%2023_Jan_2014.pdf.
  17. 17.↵
    United States Pharmacopeia (USP). USP <1115> Bioburden Control of Nonsterile Drug Substances and Products. USP 38—NF33; United States Pharmacopeial Convention: Rockville, MD, 2015; p 1185.
  18. 18.↵
    ICH Q6A. Specification: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products Chemical Substances. ICH. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, October 1999. http://www.ich.org.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Sutton S.
    The Importance of Microbiology in the Contamination Control Plan for Aseptic, Terminally Sterilized and Non-sterile Manufacturing. Pharm. Microbiol. Forum Newsletter 2007, 13 (6), 3–5.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    FDA. Guidance for Industry—Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS) Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production. October 2006. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm070287.pdf.
  21. 21.↵
    FDA. Guidance for Industry—Contract Manufacturing Arrangements for Drugs: Quality Agreements. November 2016. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm353925.pdf.
  22. 22.↵
    FDA. Enforcement Reports. US Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/EnforcementReports/default.htm.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Guilfoyle D. E.,
    2. Friedman R. L.,
    3. Hughes P. F.,
    4. Hussong D.,
    5. Rosenberg A. S.,
    6. Brorson K.
    Microbial Risk in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and ICH Q9. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2013, 67 (2), 79–81.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sutton S.
    How to Determine If an Organism Is “Objectionable”. Pharm. Microbiology Forum Newsletter 2006, 12 (7), 2–9.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 72 (1)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 72, Issue 1
January/February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A QRM Discussion of Microbial Contamination of Non-sterile Drug Products, Using FDA and EMA Warning Letters Recorded between 2008 and 2016
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A QRM Discussion of Microbial Contamination of Non-sterile Drug Products, Using FDA and EMA Warning Letters Recorded between 2008 and 2016
Ana M. C. Santos, Mara S. Doria, Luís Meirinhos-Soares, António J. Almeida, José C. Menezes
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jan 2018, 72 (1) 62-72; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.007252

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A QRM Discussion of Microbial Contamination of Non-sterile Drug Products, Using FDA and EMA Warning Letters Recorded between 2008 and 2016
Ana M. C. Santos, Mara S. Doria, Luís Meirinhos-Soares, António J. Almeida, José C. Menezes
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jan 2018, 72 (1) 62-72; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.007252
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgments
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Contamination Control Strategy: Implementation Road Map
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phase-Incremental Decision Trees for Multi-Phase Feature Selection and Interaction in Biologics Manufacturing
  • Practical Application of Setting up an Annual Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) Assessment
  • A Risk Assessment and Risk Based Approach Review of Pre-use/Post Sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT)
Show more Case Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • quality risk management
  • Microbiological Contamination
  • Warning letters
  • Non-Sterile Drug Products

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire