Local Concentrating, Not Shear Stress, That May Lead to Possible Instability of Protein Molecules During Syringe Injection: A Fluid Dynamic Study with Two-Phase Flow Model

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Shire S. J.,
   2. Shahrokh Z.,
   3. Liu J.

   Challenges in the Development of High Protein Concentration Formulations. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 93 (6), 1390–1402.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Frokjaer S.,
   2. Otzen D.

   Protein Drug Stability: A Formulation Challenge. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4 (4), 298–306.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Overcashier D. E.,
   2. Chan E. K.,
   3. Hsu C. C.

   Technical Considerations in the Development of Prefilled Syringes for Protein Products. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2006, 9, 77–83.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Sacha G.,
   2. Rogers J. A.,
   3. Miller R. L.

   Pre-Filled Syringes: A Review of the History, Manufacturing and Challenges. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2015, 20 (1), 1–11.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Saluja A.,
   2. Kalonia D. S.

   Nature and Consequences of Protein-Protein Interactions in High Protein Concentration Solutions. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 358 (1–2), 1–15.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kanai S.,
   2. Liu J.,
   3. Patapoff T. W.,
   4. Shire S. J.

   Reversible Self-Association of a Concentrated Monoclonal Antibody Solution Mediated by Fab-Fab Interaction That Impacts Solution Viscosity. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97 (10), 4219–4227.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Janowski R.,
   2. Kozak M.,
   3. Jankowska E.,
   4. Grzonka Z.,
   5. Grubb A.,
   6. Abrahamson M.,
   7. Jaskolski M.

   Human Cystatin C, an Amyloidogenic Protein, Dimerizes Through Three-Dimensional Domain Swapping. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8 (4), 316–320.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Liu Y.,
   2. Eisenberg D.

   3D Domain Swapping: As Domains Continue to Swap. Protein Sci. 2002, 11 (6), 1285–1299.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Jahn T. R.,
   2. Radford S. E.

   The Yin and Yang of Protein Folding. FEBS J. 2005, 272 (23), 5962–5970.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Mozhaev V. V.,
    2. Heremans K.,
    3. Frank J.,
    4. Masson P.,
    5. Balny C.

    High Pressure Effects on Protein Structure and Function. Proteins: Struc. Func. 1996, 24 (1), 81–91.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Ledward D. A.

    Effects of Pressure on Protein Structure. High Press. Res. 2000, 19 (1–6), 1–10.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Kobko N.,
    2. Dannenberg J. J.

    Cooperativity in Amide Hydrogen Bonding Chains. Relation Between Energy, Position, and H-Bond Chain Length in Peptide and Protein Folding Models. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107 (48), 10389–10395.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Chi E. Y.,
    2. Krishnan S.,
    3. Randolph T. W.,
    4. Carpenter J. F.

    Physical Stability of Proteins in Aqueous Solution: Mechanism and Driving Forces in Nonnative Protein Aggregation. Pharm. Res. 2003, 20 (9), 1325–1336.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. De Gennes P. G.

    Coil-Strength Transition of Dilute Polymers Under Ultrahigh Velocity-Gradients. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60 (12), 5030–5042.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Zheng F.,
    2. Robertson A. P.,
    3. Abongwa M.,
    4. Yu E. W.,
    5. Martin R. J.

    The Ascaris suum Nicotinic Receptor, ACR-16, as a Drug Target: Four Novel Negative Allosteric Modulators from Virtual Screening. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2016, 6 (1), 60–73.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Robinson G. W.,
    2. Cho C. H.

    Role of Hydration Water in Protein Unfolding. Biophys. J. 1999, 77 (6), 3311–3318.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Chen X.,
    2. Weber I.,
    3. Harrison R. W.

    Hydration Water and Bulk Water in Proteins Have Distinct Properties in Radial Distributions Calculated from 105 Atomic Resolution Crystal Structures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112 (38), 12073–12080.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Perticaroli S.,
    2. Ehlers G.,
    3. Stanley C. B.,
    4. Mamontov E.,
    5. O'Neill H.,
    6. Zhang Q.,
    7. Cheng X.,
    8. Myles D. A.,
    9. Katsaras J.,
    10. Nickels J. D.

    Description of Hydration Water in Protein (Green Fluorescent Protein) Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (3), 1098–1105.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Bekard I. B.,
    2. Asimakis P.,
    3. Bertolini J.,
    4. Dunstan D. E.

    The Effects of Shear Flow on Protein Structure and Function. Biopolymers 2011, 95 (11), 733–745.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Dobson J.,
    2. Kumar A.,
    3. Willis L. F.,
    4. Tuma R.,
    5. Higazi D. R.,
    6. Turner R.,
    7. Lowe D. C.,
    8. Ashcroft A. E.,
    9. Radford S. E.,
    10. Kapur N.,
    11. Brockwell D. J.

    Inducing Protein Aggregation by Extensional Flow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114 (18), 4673–4678.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Jaspe J.,
    2. Hagen S.

    J. Do Protein Molecules Unfold in a Simple Shear Flow? Biophys. J. 2006, 91 (9), 3415–3424.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Atkins E. D. T.,
    2. Taylor M. A.

    Elongational Flow Studies on DNA in Aqueous Solution and Stress-Induced Scission of the Double Helix. Biopolymers 1992, 32 (8), 911–923.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Larson J. W.,
    2. Yantz G. R.,
    3. Zhong Q.,
    4. Charnas R.,
    5. D'Antoni C. M.,
    6. Gallo M. V.,
    7. Gillis K. A.,
    8. Neely L. A.,
    9. Phillips K. M.,
    10. Wong G. G.,
    11. Gullans S. R.,
    12. Gilmanshin R.

    Single DNA Molecule Stretching in Sudden Mixed Shear and Elongational Microflows. Lab Chip 2006, 6 (9), 1187–1199.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Smith D. E.,
    2. Babcock H. P.,
    3. Chu S.

    Single-Polymer Dynamics in Steady Shear Flow. Science 1999, 283 (5408), 1724–1727.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. LeDuc P.,
    2. Haber C.,
    3. Bao G.,
    4. Wirtz D.

    Dynamics of Individual Flexible Polymers in a Shear Flow. Nature 1999, 399 (6736), 564–566.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Long Q.,
    2. Xu X. Y.,
    3. Ariff B.,
    4. Thom S.,
    5. Hughes A. D.,
    6. Stanton A. V.

    Reconstruction of Blood Flow Patterns in a Human Carotid Bifurcation: A Combined CFD and MRI Study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000, 11 (3), 299–311.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Marshall I.,
    2. Zhao S.,
    3. Papathanasopoulou P.,
    4. Hoskins P.,
    5. Xu X. Y.

    MRI and CFD Studies of Pulsatile Flow in Healthy and Stenosed Carotid Bifurcation Models. J. Biomech. 2004, 37 (5), 679–687.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Byun H. S.,
    2. Rhee K.

    CFD Modeling of Blood Flow Following Coil Embolization of Aneurysms. Med. Eng. Phys. 2004, 26 (9), 755–761.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Acheson D. J.

    Elementary Fluid Dynamics; Oxford Applied Mathematics and Computing Science Series; Oxford University Press: U.K., 1990.
30. 30.↵
    1. Gad-el-Hak M.

    Stokes' Hypothesis for a Newtonian, Isotropic Fluid. J. Fluids Eng. 1995, 117 (1), 3–5.

    OpenUrl
31. 31.↵
    1. Hinze J. O.

    Momentum and Mechanical-Energy Balance Equations for a Flowing Homogeneous Suspension with Slip Between the Two Phases. Appl. Sci. Res. A 1963, 11 (1), 33–46.

    OpenUrl
32. 32.↵
    1. Manninen M.,
    2. Taivassalo V.,
    3. Kallio S.

    On the Mixture Model for Multiphase Flow. VTT Publication 288; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland: Espoo, 1996.
33. 33.↵
    1. Hiltunen K.,
    2. Jasberg A.,
    3. Kallo S.,
    4. Karema H.,
    5. Kataja M.,
    6. Koponen A.,
    7. Manninen M.,
    8. Taivassal V.

    Multiphase Flow Dynamics: Theory and Numerics. VTT Publication 722; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland: Espoo, 2009.
34. 34.↵
    1. Phillips R. J.,
    2. Armstrong R. C.,
    3. Brown R. A.,
    4. Graham A. L.,
    5. Abbot J. R.

    A Constitutive Equation for Concentrated Suspension that Accounts for Shear-Induced Particle Migration. Phys. Fluids A 1992, 4 (1), 30–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Subia S. R.,
    2. Ingber M. S.,
    3. Mondy L. A.,
    4. Altobelli S. A.,
    5. Graham A. L.

    Modelling of Concentrated Suspensions Using a Continuum Constitutive Equation. J. Fluid Mech. 1998, 373 (1), 193–219.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Rao R.,
    2. Mondy L.,
    3. Sun A.,
    4. Altobelli S.

    A Numerical and Experimental Study of Batch Sedimentation and Viscous Resuspension. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2002, 39 (6), 465–483.

    OpenUrl
37. 37.↵
    1. Stokes G. G.

    On the Effect of the Internal Friction of Fluids in the Motion of Pendulums. Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 1851, 9, 8–106.

    OpenUrl
38. 38.↵
    1. Yang H.,
    2. Fan M.,
    3. Liu A.,
    4. Dong L.

    General Formulas for Drag Coefficient and Settling Velocity of Sphere Based on Theoretical Law. Int. J. Mining Sci. Tech. 2015, 25 (2), 219–223.

    OpenUrl
39. 39.↵
    1. Krieger I. M.

    Rheology of Monodisperse Lattices. Advan. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972, 3 (2), 111–136.

    OpenUrl
40. 40.↵
    1. Thomas D. G.

    Transport Characteristics of Suspensions VIII: A Note on the Viscosity of Newtonian Suspensions of Uniform Spherical Particles. J. Colloid Sci. 1965, 20 (3), 267–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    COMSOL Multiphysics User Manual, Mixture Model, Multiphase Flow, Fluid Flow Module, COMSOL Multiphysics, COMSOL Inc.
42. 42.↵
    1. Chen Y.,
    2. Radford S. E.,
    3. Brockwell D. J.

    Force-Induced Remodelling of Proteins and their Complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 30, 89–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Majekodunmi S. O.

    A Review on Centrifugation in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Am. J. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 5 (2), 67–78.

    OpenUrl
44. 44.↵
    1. Segre G.,
    2. Silberberg A.

    Behavior of Macroscopic Rigid Spheres in Poiseuille Flow Part 2. Experimental Results and Interpretation. J. Fluid Mech. 1962, 14 (1), 136–157.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Myers J. K.,
    2. Pace C. N.,
    3. Scholtz J. M.

    Denaturant m Values and Heat Capacity Changes: Relation to Changes in Accessible Surface Areas of Protein Unfolding. Protein Sci. 1995, 4 (10), 2138–2148.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Dazhi G.,
    2. Tanner R. I.

    The Drag on a Sphere in a Power-Law Fluid. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 1985, 17 (1), 1–12.

    OpenUrl
47. 47.↵
    1. Perktold K.,
    2. Resch M.,
    3. Florian H.

    Pulsatile Non-Newtonian Flow Characteristics in a Three-Dimensional Human Carotid Bifurcation Model. J. Biomech. Eng. 1991, 113 (4), 464–475.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    1. Abraham F.,
    2. Behr M.,
    3. Heinkenschloss M.

    Shape Optimisation in Steady Blood Flow: A Numerical Study of Non-Newtonian Effects. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 8 (2), 127–137.

    OpenUrlPubMed