Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch

National Economic and Environmental Benefit of Reusable Textiles in Cleanroom Industry

Michael Overcash and Evan Griffing
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology March 2022, 76 (2) 109-119; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012138
Michael Overcash
1Environmental Genome Initiative, 2908 Chipmunk Lane, Raleigh, NC 27607;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mrovercash@earthlink.net
Evan Griffing
2Environmental Clarity, Inc., 2505 Fauquier Lane, Reston, VA 20191
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/HICPAC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Web site. https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/eic_HCF_03.pdf (accessed April 2020).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Glosson S.
    Precision Fabrics, Greensboro, NC, 2020.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Alshqaqeeq F.,
    2. Griffing E.,
    3. Twomey J.,
    4. Overcash M.
    Comparing Reusable to Disposable Products: Life Cycle Analysis Metrics. J. Adv. Manuf. Process 2020, 2 (4), e10065.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vozzola E.,
    2. Overcash M.,
    3. Griffing E.
    Life Cycle Assessment of Cleanroom Coveralls: Reusable and Disposable. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2018, 72 (3), 236–248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Vozzola E.,
    2. Overcash M.,
    3. Griffing E.
    Environmental Considerations in the Selection of Isolation Gowns: A Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Alternatives. Am. J. Infect. Control 2018, 46 (8), 881–886. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196655318300750.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Overcash M.
    A Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Perioperative Textiles: Sustainability State-of-the-Art 2012. Anesth. Analg. 2012, 114 (5), 1055–1066.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. McDowell J. W.
    J&J Study: An Environmental, Economic, and Health Comparison of Single-Use and Reusable Drapes and Gowns. Asepsis 1993, 13, 1–15.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    European Textile Service Association. Simplified Life Cycle Assessment of Surgical Gowns. ETSA: Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Carre A.
    Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Laundered Surgical Gowns with Polypropylene Based Disposable Gowns. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University: Melbourne, Australia, 2008.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Van den Berghe A.,
    2. Riegel A.,
    3. Zimmer C.
    Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Surgical Gowns. Minnesota Technical Assistance Program: Minneapolis, MN, 2010.
  11. 11.↵
    UniTech Corp. Life Cycle Inventory Comparison of Radiological Protective Garments. UniTech Corp: Springfield, MA, 2010.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Vozzola E.,
    2. Overcash M.,
    3. Griffing E.
    An Environmental Analysis of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Gowns. AORN J. 2020, 111 (3), 315–325.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Laufman H.,
    2. Belkin N. L.,
    3. Meyer K. K.
    A Critical Review of a Century’s Progress in Surgical Apparel: How Far Have We Come? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2000, 191 (5), 554–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rutala W.,
    2. Weber D.
    A Review of Single-Use and Reusable Gowns and Drapes in Health Care. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2001, 22 (4), 248–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gruendemann B.
    Taking Cover: Single-Use vs. Reusable Gowns and Drapes. Infect. Control Today 2002, 6 (3), 32–34.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. DiGiacomo J. C.,
    2. Odom J. W.,
    3. Ritota P. C.,
    4. Swan K. G.
    Cost Containment in the Operating Room: Use of Reusable versus Disposable Clothing. Am. Surg. 1992, 58 (10), 654–656.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Baykasoğlu A.,
    2. Dereli T.,
    3. Yılankırkan N.
    Application of Cost/Benefit Analysis for Surgical Gown and Drape Selection: A Case Study. Am. J. Infect. Control 2009, 37 (3), 215–226.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rossington K.
    Laundered Mops: A Question of Performance. Cleanroom Technology 2018, 23–25.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Clarke G.
    Making the Case for the Use of Reusable Wipers in the Healthcare Setting. UMF Corp, 2016.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maurer D.,
    2. Donelle R.
    Launderable Microfiber vs Disposable Product, Creative Products International, Presented at IAHTM Conference, 2017.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rossington K.
    Is Reuse a Sensible Route to Consumables Cost Savings? Manuf. Chem. 2012, 86–87.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tebbutt G. M.
    Laboratory Evaluation of Disposable and Reusable Disinfectant Cloths for Cleaning Food Contact Surfaces. Epidemiol. Infect. 1988, 101 (2), 367–375.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    U.S. Price of Landfilling Municipal Waste by Region 2018, Statista Web site. https://www.statista.com/statistics/692063/cost-to-landfill-municipal-solid-waste-by-us-region/ (accessed August 2019).
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wilson L.
    Media Footprints Compared. www.shrinkthatfootprint.com. (accessed January 2019).
  25. 25.↵
    1. Scarborough P.,
    2. Appleby P. N.,
    3. Mizdrak A.,
    4. Briggs A. D. M.,
    5. Travis R. C.,
    6. Bradbury K. E.,
    7. Key T. J.
    Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Meat-Eaters, Fish-Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans in the UK. Climatic Change 2014, 125 (2), 179–192.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.
    1. Deiterich A.
    A Carbon Footprint Definition for Kids. Healthfully Web site. https://healthfully.com/159514-carbon-footprint-definition-for-kids.html (accessed February 2020).
  27. 27.↵
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. Office of Transportation and Air Quality. EPA-420-F-11-041. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f11041.pdf
  28. 28.↵
    1. Apfalter P.
    Reusable Surgical Fabrics, Consensus Statement: State of the Art 2011. CliniCum 2011, 1–11.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Mittermayer H.
    Reusable Surgical Fabrics, State of the Art 2003. CliniCum 2005, 3–11.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mekjavic L.,
    2. Banister E. W.,
    3. Morrison J. B.
    1. Umbach K.
    Physiological Tests and Evaluation Models for the Optimization of the Performance of Protective Clothing. In. Environmental Ergonomics: Sustaining Human Performance in Harsh Environments; Mekjavic L., Banister E. W., Morrison J. B., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: Philadelphia, 1988; pp 131–161.
  31. 31.↵
    International Organisation for Standardization, ISO 11092 (1993), Textiles, Physiological Effects, Measurement of Thermal and Water-Vapor Resistance Under Steady-State Conditions (Sweating Guarded-Hotplate Test), ISO: Geneva, 1993.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Conrardy J.,
    2. Hillanbrand M.,
    3. Myers S.,
    4. Nussbaum G. F.
    Reducing Medical Waste. AORN J. 2010, 91 (6), 711–721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 76 (2)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 76, Issue 2
March/April 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
National Economic and Environmental Benefit of Reusable Textiles in Cleanroom Industry
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
National Economic and Environmental Benefit of Reusable Textiles in Cleanroom Industry
Michael Overcash, Evan Griffing
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2022, 76 (2) 109-119; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
National Economic and Environmental Benefit of Reusable Textiles in Cleanroom Industry
Michael Overcash, Evan Griffing
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2022, 76 (2) 109-119; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012138
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Goal and Scope
    • Results
    • Discussion of Future Analysis Goals
    • Conclusions
    • Conflict of Interest Declaration
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Worldwide Regulatory Reliance: Results of an Executed Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Post-Approval Change Pilot
  • Preservative Efficacy Testing of Refrigerated Pharmaceuticals: Choice of Challenging Isolate and Storage Temperature
  • Analysis of Virus Clearance for Biotechnology Manufacturing Processes from Early to Late Phase Development
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cleanroom reusable textiles
  • economic and environmental benefits
  • U.S. national benefits of reusables

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire