National Economic and Environmental Benefit of Reusable Textiles in Cleanroom Industry | PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

References

1.↵
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/HICPAC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Web site. https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/eic_HCF_03.pdf (accessed April 2020).
Google Scholar
2.↵
1. Glosson S.
Precision Fabrics, Greensboro, NC, 2020.
Google Scholar
3.↵
1. Alshqaqeeq F.,
2. Griffing E.,
3. Twomey J.,
4. Overcash M.
Comparing Reusable to Disposable Products: Life Cycle Analysis Metrics. J. Adv. Manuf. Process 2020, 2 (4), e10065.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
4.↵
1. Vozzola E.,
2. Overcash M.,
3. Griffing E.
Life Cycle Assessment of Cleanroom Coveralls: Reusable and Disposable. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2018, 72 (3), 236–248.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
5.↵
1. Vozzola E.,
2. Overcash M.,
3. Griffing E.
Environmental Considerations in the Selection of Isolation Gowns: A Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Alternatives. Am. J. Infect. Control 2018, 46 (8), 881–886. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196655318300750.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
6.↵
1. Overcash M.
A Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Perioperative Textiles: Sustainability State-of-the-Art 2012. Anesth. Analg. 2012, 114 (5), 1055–1066.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
7.↵
1. McDowell J. W.
J&J Study: An Environmental, Economic, and Health Comparison of Single-Use and Reusable Drapes and Gowns. Asepsis 1993, 13, 1–15.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
8.↵
European Textile Service Association. Simplified Life Cycle Assessment of Surgical Gowns. ETSA: Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
Google Scholar
9.↵
1. Carre A.
Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Laundered Surgical Gowns with Polypropylene Based Disposable Gowns. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University: Melbourne, Australia, 2008.
Google Scholar
10.↵
1. Van den Berghe A.,
2. Riegel A.,
3. Zimmer C.
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Surgical Gowns. Minnesota Technical Assistance Program: Minneapolis, MN, 2010.
Google Scholar
11.↵
UniTech Corp. Life Cycle Inventory Comparison of Radiological Protective Garments. UniTech Corp: Springfield, MA, 2010.
Google Scholar
12.↵
1. Vozzola E.,
2. Overcash M.,
3. Griffing E.
An Environmental Analysis of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Gowns. AORN J. 2020, 111 (3), 315–325.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
13.↵
1. Laufman H.,
2. Belkin N. L.,
3. Meyer K. K.
A Critical Review of a Century’s Progress in Surgical Apparel: How Far Have We Come? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2000, 191 (5), 554–568.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
14.↵
1. Rutala W.,
2. Weber D.
A Review of Single-Use and Reusable Gowns and Drapes in Health Care. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2001, 22 (4), 248–257.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
15.↵
1. Gruendemann B.
Taking Cover: Single-Use vs. Reusable Gowns and Drapes. Infect. Control Today 2002, 6 (3), 32–34.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
16.↵
1. DiGiacomo J. C.,
2. Odom J. W.,
3. Ritota P. C.,
4. Swan K. G.
Cost Containment in the Operating Room: Use of Reusable versus Disposable Clothing. Am. Surg. 1992, 58 (10), 654–656.
OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
17.↵
1. Baykasoğlu A.,
2. Dereli T.,
3. Yılankırkan N.
Application of Cost/Benefit Analysis for Surgical Gown and Drape Selection: A Case Study. Am. J. Infect. Control 2009, 37 (3), 215–226.
OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
18.↵
1. Rossington K.
Laundered Mops: A Question of Performance. Cleanroom Technology 2018, 23–25.
Google Scholar
19.↵
1. Clarke G.
Making the Case for the Use of Reusable Wipers in the Healthcare Setting. UMF Corp, 2016.
Google Scholar
20.↵
1. Maurer D.,
2. Donelle R.
Launderable Microfiber vs Disposable Product, Creative Products International, Presented at IAHTM Conference, 2017.
Google Scholar
21.↵
1. Rossington K.
Is Reuse a Sensible Route to Consumables Cost Savings? Manuf. Chem. 2012, 86–87.
Google Scholar
22.↵
1. Tebbutt G. M.
Laboratory Evaluation of Disposable and Reusable Disinfectant Cloths for Cleaning Food Contact Surfaces. Epidemiol. Infect. 1988, 101 (2), 367–375.
OpenUrl PubMed Google Scholar
23.↵
U.S. Price of Landfilling Municipal Waste by Region 2018, Statista Web site. https://www.statista.com/statistics/692063/cost-to-landfill-municipal-solid-waste-by-us-region/ (accessed August 2019).
Google Scholar
24.↵
1. Wilson L.
Media Footprints Compared. www.shrinkthatfootprint.com. (accessed January 2019).
Google Scholar
25.↵
1. Scarborough P.,
2. Appleby P. N.,
3. Mizdrak A.,
4. Briggs A. D. M.,
5. Travis R. C.,
6. Bradbury K. E.,
7. Key T. J.
Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Meat-Eaters, Fish-Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans in the UK. Climatic Change 2014, 125 (2), 179–192.
OpenUrl Google Scholar
26.
1. Deiterich A.
A Carbon Footprint Definition for Kids. Healthfully Web site. https://healthfully.com/159514-carbon-footprint-definition-for-kids.html (accessed February 2020).
Google Scholar
27.↵
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. Office of Transportation and Air Quality. EPA-420-F-11-041. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f11041.pdf
Google Scholar
28.↵
1. Apfalter P.
Reusable Surgical Fabrics, Consensus Statement: State of the Art 2011. CliniCum 2011, 1–11.
Google Scholar
29.↵
1. Mittermayer H.
Reusable Surgical Fabrics, State of the Art 2003. CliniCum 2005, 3–11.
Google Scholar
30.↵
1. Mekjavic L.,
2. Banister E. W.,
3. Morrison J. B.
1. Umbach K.
Physiological Tests and Evaluation Models for the Optimization of the Performance of Protective Clothing. In. Environmental Ergonomics: Sustaining Human Performance in Harsh Environments; Mekjavic L., Banister E. W., Morrison J. B., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: Philadelphia, 1988; pp 131–161.
Google Scholar
31.↵
International Organisation for Standardization, ISO 11092 (1993), Textiles, Physiological Effects, Measurement of Thermal and Water-Vapor Resistance Under Steady-State Conditions (Sweating Guarded-Hotplate Test), ISO: Geneva, 1993.
Google Scholar
32.↵
1. Conrardy J.,
2. Hillanbrand M.,
3. Myers S.,
4. Nussbaum G. F.
Reducing Medical Waste. AORN J. 2010, 91 (6), 711–721.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar