Replacing the Emulsion for Bake-on Siliconization of Containers—Comparison of Emulsion Stability and Container Performance in the Context of Protein Formulations

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ingle R. G.,
   2. Agarwal A. S.

   Pre-Filled Syringe – a Ready-to-Use Drug Delivery System: A Review. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2014, 11 (9), 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.923400.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   1. Sacha G.,
   2. Rogers J. A.,
   3. Miller R. L.

   Pre-Filled Syringes: A Review of the History, Manufacturing and Challenges. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2015, 20 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/10837450.2014.982825.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   1. Sacha G. A.,
   2. Saffell-Clemmer W.,
   3. Abram K.,
   4. Akers M. J.

   Practical Fundamentals of Glass, Rubber, and Plastic Sterile Packaging Systems. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2010, 15 (1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/10837450903511178.

   OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   1. Makwana S.,
   2. Basu B.,
   3. Makasana Y.,
   4. Dharamsi A.

   Prefilled Syringes: An Innovation in Parenteral Packaging. Int. J. Pharm. Invest. 2011, 1 (4), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973X.93004.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   1. Warne N. W.,
   2. Mahler H. C.

   Challenges in Protein Product Development. Warne N. W., Mahler H. C., Eds.; AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series Vol. 38; Springer, Cham, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90603-4.

   Google Scholar
6. 6.↵
   1. Funke S.,
   2. Matilainen J.,
   3. Nalenz H.,
   4. Bechtold-Peters K.,
   5. Mahler H.-C.,
   6. Friess W.

   Silicone Migration from Baked-on Silicone Layers. Particle Characterization in Placebo and Protein Solutions. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105 (12), 3520–3531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.08.031.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   1. Gerhardt A.,
   2. Mcgraw N. R.,
   3. Schwartz D. K.,
   4. Bee J. S.,
   5. Carpenter J. F.,
   6. Randolph T. W.

   Protein Aggregation and Particle Formation in Prefilled Glass Syringes. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 103 (6), 1601–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23973.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   1. Jones L. S.,
   2. Kaufmann A.,
   3. Middaugh C. R.

   Silicone Oil Induced Aggregation of Proteins. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94 (4), 918–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20321.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   1. Shah M.,
   2. Rattray Z.,
   3. Day K.,
   4. Uddin S.,
   5. Curtis R.,
   6. van der Walle C. F.,
   7. Pluen A.

   Evaluation of Aggregate and Silicone-Oil Counts in Pre-Filled Siliconized Syringes: An Orthogonal Study Characterising the Entire Subvisible Size Range. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 519 (1-2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.015.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    1. Li J.,
    2. Pinnamaneni S.,
    3. Quan Y.,
    4. Jaiswal A.,
    5. Andersson F. I.,
    6. Zhang X.

    Mechanistic Understanding of Protein-Silicone Oil Interactions. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29 (6), 1689–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-012-0696-6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    1. Badkar A.,
    2. Wolf A.,
    3. Bohack L.,
    4. Kolhe P.

    Development of Biotechnology Products in Pre-Filled Syringes: Technical Considerations and Approaches. AAPS PharmSciTech 2011, 12 (2), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-011-9617-y.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    1. Thirumangalathu R.,
    2. Krishnan S.,
    3. Ricci M. S.,
    4. Brems D. N.,
    5. Randolph T. W.,
    6. Carpenter J. F.

    Silicone Oil- and Agitation-Induced Aggregation of a Monoclonal Antibody in Aqueous Solution. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98 (9), 3167–3181. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21719.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    1. Basu P.,
    2. Blake-Haskins A. W.,
    3. O'Berry K. B.,
    4. Randolph T. W.,
    5. Carpenter J. F.

    Albinterferon α2b Adsorption to Silicone Oil–Water Interfaces: Effects on Protein Conformation, Aggregation, and Subvisible Particle Formation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 103 (2), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23821.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    1. Chisholm C. F.,
    2. Baker A. E.,
    3. Soucie K. R.,
    4. Torres R. M.,
    5. Carpenter J. F.,
    6. Randolph T. W.

    Silicone Oil Microdroplets Can Induce Antibody Responses against Recombinant Murine Growth Hormone in Mice. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105 (5), 1623–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.02.019.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    1. Gerhardt A.,
    2. Nguyen B. H.,
    3. Lewus R.,
    4. Carpenter J. F.,
    5. Randolph T. W.

    Effect of the Siliconization Method on Particle Generation in a Monoclonal Antibody Formulation in Pre-Filled Syringes. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104 (5), 1601–1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24387.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    1. Funke S.,
    2. Matilainen J.,
    3. Nalenz H.,
    4. Bechtold-Peters K.,
    5. Mahler H.-C.,
    6. Friess W.

    Analysis of Thin Baked-on Silicone Layers by FTIR and 3D-Laser Scanning Microscopy. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 96, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.08.009.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    1. Mundry A. T.

    Einbrennsilikonisierung Bei Pharmazeutischen Glaspackmitteln - Analytische Studien Eines Produktionsprozesses. Ph.D. Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 1999.

    Google Scholar
18. 18.↵
    1. Mundry T.,
    2. Surmann P.,
    3. Schurreit T.

    Surface Characterization of Polydimethylsiloxane Treated Pharmaceutical Glass Containers by X-Ray-Excited Photo- and Auger Electron Spectroscopy. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 368 (8), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160000593.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    DDP Specialty Products Germany Gmbh & Co. Kg. Sicherheitsdatenblatt, Dow Corning^TM 365 35% Dimethicone NF Emulsion, Version: 3.0, Oct 13, 2018.

    Google Scholar
20. 20.↵
    DDP Specialty Products Germany Gmbh & Co. Kg. Sicherheitsdatenblatt, Dow CorningTM 366 35% Dimethicone NF Emulsion, Version: 2.0, Jan 18, 2019.

    Google Scholar
21. 21.↵
    1. Funke S.,
    2. Matilainen J.,
    3. Nalenz H.,
    4. Bechtold-Peters K.,
    5. Mahler H.-C.,
    6. Vetter F.,
    7. Müller C.,
    8. Bracher F.,
    9. Friess W.

    Optimization of the Bake-on Siliconization of Cartridges. Part II: Investigations into Burn-in Time and Temperature. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 105, 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.05.015.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
22. 22.↵
    Dow Corning Corporation. Product Information Dow Corning® 360 Medical Fluid; Form No. 51-0374O-01.

    Google Scholar
23. 23.↵
    Dow Corning Corporation. Dow Corning® 365, 35% Dimethicone NF Emulsion and Dow Corning® 366 35% Dimethicone NF Emulsion Frequently Asked Questions; Form No. 52-1040C-01.

    Google Scholar
24. 24.↵
    1. Kishore R. S. K.,
    2. Kiese S.,
    3. Fischer S.,
    4. Pappenberger A.,
    5. Grauschopf U.,
    6. Mahler H.-C.

    The Degradation of Polysorbates 20 and 80 and Its Potential Impact on the Stability of Biotherapeutics. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28 (5), 1194–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0385-x.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
25. 25.↵
    1. Camino G.,
    2. Lomakin S. M.,
    3. Lazzari M.

    Polydimethylsiloxane Thermal Degradation Part 1. Kinetic Aspects. Polymer 2001, 42 (6), 2395–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00652-2.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    1. Camino G.,
    2. Lomakin S. M.,
    3. Lageard M.

    Thermal Polydimethylsiloxane Degradation. Part 2. The Degradation Mechanisms. Polymer 2002, 43 (7), 2011–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00785-6.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
27. 27.↵
    1. Thomas T. H.,
    2. Kendrick T. C.

    Thermal Analysis of Polydimethylsiloxanes. I. Thermal Degradation in Controlled Atmospheres. J. Polym. Sci. A-2 Polym. Phys. 1969, 7 (3), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1969.160070308.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
28. 28.↵
    1. Ballistreri A.,
    2. Garozzo D.,
    3. Montaudo G.

    Mass Spectral Characterization and Thermal Decomposition Mechanism of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane). Macromolecules 1984, 17 (7), 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00137a003.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
29. 29.↵
    1. Grassie N.,
    2. Macfarlane I. G.

    The Thermal Degradation of Polysiloxanes-I. Poly(Dimethylsiloxane). Eur. Polym. J. 1978, 14 (11), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-3057(78)90084-8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. 30.↵
    1. Clarson S. J.,
    2. Semlyen J. A.

    Studies of Cyclic and Linear Poly(Dimethyl-Siloxanes): 21. High Temperature Thermal Behaviour. Polymer 1986, 27 (1), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(86)90360-5.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
31. 31.↵
    1. Pretsch E.,
    2. Bühlmann P.,
    3. Badertscher M.

    Structure Determination of Organic Compounds, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93810-1.

    Google Scholar
32. 32.↵
    1. Detloff T.,
    2. Sobisch T.,
    3. Lerche D.

    Particle Size Distribution by Space or Time Dependent Extinction Profiles Obtained by Analytical Centrifugation. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2006, 23 (2), 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.200601028.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
33. 33.↵
    1. Detloff T.,
    2. Sobisch T.,
    3. Lerche D.

    Particle Size Distribution by Space or Time Dependent Extinction Profiles Obtained by Analytical Centrifugation (Concentrated Systems). Powder Technol. 2007, 174 (1-2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.021.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
34. 34.↵
    1. Owens D. K.,
    2. Wendt R. C.

    Estimation of the Surface Free Energy of Polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969, 13 (8), 1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. 35.↵
    1. Schramm L. L.

    Emulsions, Foams, and Suspensions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527606750.

    Google Scholar
36. 36.↵
    1. Dörfler H.-D.

    Grenzflächen und Kolloid-Disperse Systeme, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002.

    Google Scholar
37. 37.↵
    1. Goodarzi F.,
    2. Zendehboudi S.

    A Comprehensive Review on Emulsions and Emulsion Stability in Chemical and Energy Industries. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 97 (1), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23336.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
38. 38.↵
    1. Tadros T. F.

    Emulsion Formation and Stability; Tadros T. F., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527647941.

    Google Scholar
39. 39.↵
    1. Lauth G. J.,
    2. Kowalczyk J.

    Einführung in die Physik und Chemie der Grenzflächen und Kolloide; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47018-3.

    Google Scholar
40. 40.↵
    1. Nieloud F.,
    2. Marti-Mestres G.

    Pharmaceutical Emulsions and Suspensions; Nieloud F., Marti-Mestres G., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar
41. 41.↵
    1. Binks B. P.

    Modern Aspects of Emulsion Science; Binks B. P., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847551474.

    Google Scholar
42. 42.↵
    1. Funke S.,
    2. Matilainen J.,
    3. Nalenz H.,
    4. Bechtold-Peters K.,
    5. Mahler H.-C.,
    6. Friess W.

    Optimization of the Bake-on Siliconization of Cartridges. Part I: Optimization of the Spray-on Parameters. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 104, 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.05.007.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
43. 43.↵
    1. McClements D. J.,
    2. Jafari S. M.

    Improving Emulsion Formation, Stability and Performance Using Mixed Emulsifiers: A Review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 251 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.12.001.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
44. 44.↵
    1. Vilasau J.,
    2. Solans C.,
    3. Gómez M.,
    4. Dabrio J.,
    5. Mújika-Garai R.,
    6. Esquena J.

    Stability of Oil-in-Water Paraffin Emulsions Prepared in a Mixed Ionic/Nonionic Surfactant System. Colloids Surf., A 2011, 389 (1-3), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.08.023.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
45. 45.↵
    1. Buszello K.,
    2. Harnisch S.,
    3. Müller R. H.,
    4. Müller B. W.

    The Influence of Alkali Fatty Acids on the Properties and the Stability of Parenteral O/W Emulsions Modified with Solutol HS 15®. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2000, 49 (2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(99)00081-8.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
46. 46.↵
    Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH. Sicherheitsdatenblatt Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 Propylene Glycol; April 26, 2020.

    Google Scholar
47. 47.↵
    Roth GmbH. Sicherheitsdatenblatt Gemäss Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH), Geändert Mit 2015/830/EU 2-Phenoxyethanol ≥99% Zur Synthese; Aug 10, 2018.

    Google Scholar
48. 48.↵
    Roth GmbH. Sicherheitsdatenblatt Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH),4-Hydroxybenzoesäure-Methylester ROTICHROM® Working Standard; Jan 14, 2016.

    Google Scholar
49. 49.↵
    Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH. Sicherheitsdatenblatt Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr 1907/2006 4-Hydroxybenzoesäure-Propylester; Apr 17, 2019.

    Google Scholar
50. 50.↵
    1. Chatterjee K.,
    2. Dollimore D.,
    3. Alexander K.

    A New Application for the Antoine Equation in Formulation Development. Int. J. Pharm. 2001, 213 (1-2), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00644-X.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
51. 51.↵
    1. Kishore R. S. K.,
    2. Pappenberger A.,
    3. Dauphin I. B.,
    4. Ross A.,
    5. Buergi B.,
    6. Staempfli A.,
    7. Mahler H.-C.

    Degradation of Polysorbates 20 and 80: Studies on Thermal Autoxidation and Hydrolysis. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100 (2), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22290.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
52. 52.↵
    1. Kerwin B. A.

    Polysorbates 20 and 80 Used in the Formulation of Protein Biotherapeutics: Structure and Degradation Pathways. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97 (8), 2924–2935. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21190.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
53. 53.↵
    1. Donbrow M.,
    2. Azaz E.,
    3. Pillersdorf A.

    Autoxidation of Polysorbates. J. Pharm. Sci. 1978, 67 (12), 1676–1681. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600671211.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
54. 54.↵
    1. Schick M. J.

    Nonionic Surfactants: Physical Chemistry; Schick M. J., Ed.; Surfactant Science Series Vol 23; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar
55. 55.↵
    1. Santacesaria E.,
    2. Gelosa D.,
    3. Di Serio M.,
    4. Tesser R.

    Thermal Stability of Nonionic Polyoxyalkylene Surfactants. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1991, 42 (7), 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1991.070420733.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
56. 56.↵
    1. Mitsuda K.,
    2. Kimura H.,
    3. Murahashi T.

    Evaporation and Decomposition of Triton X-100 under Various Gases and Temperatures. J. Mater. Sci. 1989, 24 (2), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107420.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
57. 57.↵
    Council of Europe, Polysorbat 20. In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 9th Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2007; pp 5054–5055.

    Google Scholar
58. 58.↵
    Roth GmbH. Freiwillige Sicherheitsinformation in Anlehnung an Das Sicherheitsdatenblattformat Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH) - Myristinsäure ≥ 98%, Für Die Biochemie; Mar 3, 2020.

    Google Scholar
59. 59.↵
    Roth GmbH. Freiwillige Sicherheitsinformation in Anlehnung an Das Sicherheitsdatenblattformat Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH) - Palmitinsäure ≥98 %, Reinst; Dec 12, 2019.

    Google Scholar
60. 60.↵
    Roth GmbH. Freiwillige Sicherheitsinformation in Anlehnung an Das Sicherheitsdatenblattformat Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH) - Stearinsäure ≥98; Dec 12, 2019.

    Google Scholar
61. 61.↵
    Roth GmbH. Freiwillige Sicherheitsinformation in Anlehnung an Das Sicherheitsdatenblattformat Gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 (REACH)- Ölsäure ROTICHROM® GC; Aug 8, 2019.

    Google Scholar
62. 62.↵
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Safety Data Sheet 1,4-Anhydro-D-Sorbitol; Revision Date Nov 20, 2014.

    Google Scholar
63. 63.↵
    1. Christenson H.,
    2. Friberg S. E.

    Spectroscopic Investigation of the Mutual Interactions between Nonionic Surfactant, Hydrocarbon, and Water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 75 (1), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90369-0.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
64. 64.↵
    1. Nilsson P. G.,
    2. Wennerstroem H.,
    3. Lindman B.

    Structure of Micellar Solutions of Nonionic Surfactants. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Self-Diffusion and Proton Relaxation Studies of Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Alkyl Ethers. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87 (8), 1377–1385. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100231a021.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. 65.↵
    1. Loosli V.,
    2. Germershaus O.,
    3. Steinberg H.,
    4. Dreher S.,
    5. Grauschopf U.,
    6. Funke S.

    Methods to Determine the Silicone Oil Layer Thickness in Sprayed-On Siliconized Syringes. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2018, 72 (3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2017.007997.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
66. 66.↵
    1. Rechendorff K.,
    2. Hovgaard M. B.,
    3. Foss M.,
    4. Zhdanov V. P.,
    5. Besenbacher F.

    Enhancement of Protein Adsorption Induced by Surface Roughness. Langmuir 2006, 22 (26), 10885–10888. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0621923.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
67. 67.↵
    1. Lord M. S.,
    2. Foss M.,
    3. Besenbacher F.

    Influence of Nanoscale Surface Topography on Protein Adsorption and Cellular Response. Nano Today 2010, 5 (1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
68. 68.↵
    1. Mathes J. M.

    Protein Adsorption to Vial Surfaces – Quantification, Structural and Mechanistic Studies, Ph.D. Thesis, LMU Munich, 2010.

    Google Scholar
69. 69.↵
    1. Felsovalyi F.,
    2. Janvier S.,
    3. Jouffray S.,
    4. Soukiassian H.,
    5. Mangiagalli P.

    Silicone-Oil-Based Subvisible Particles: Their Detection, Interactions, and Regulation in Prefilled Container Closure Systems for Biopharmaceuticals. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 101 (12), 4569–4583. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23328.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
70. 70.↵
    1. Singh S. K.,
    2. Afonina N.,
    3. Awwad M.,
    4. Bechtold-Peters K.,
    5. Blue J. T.,
    6. Chou D.,
    7. Cromwell M.,
    8. Krause H.-J.,
    9. Mahler H.-C.,
    10. Meyer B. K.,
    11. Narhi L.,
    12. Nesta D. P.,
    13. Spitznagel T.

    An Industry Perspective on the Monitoring of Subvisible Particles as a Quality Attribute for Protein Therapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99 (8), 3302–3321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22097.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
71. 71.↵
    1. Zölls S.,
    2. Tantipolphan R.,
    3. Wiggenhorn M.,
    4. Winter G.,
    5. Jiskoot W.,
    6. Friess W.,
    7. Hawe A.

    Particles in Therapeutic Protein Formulations, Part 1: Overview of Analytical Methods. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 101 (3), 914–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
72. 72.↵
    1. Lorenz B.,
    2. Krick B. A.,
    3. Rodriguez N.,
    4. Sawyer W. G.,
    5. Mangiagalli P.,
    6. Persson B. N. J.

    Static or Breakloose Friction for Lubricated Contacts: The Role of Surface Roughness and Dewetting. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2013, 25 (44), 445013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/25/44/445013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
73. 73.↵
    1. Eu B.,
    2. Cairns A.,
    3. Ding G.,
    4. Cao X.,
    5. Wen Z.-Q.

    Direct Visualization of Protein Adsorption to Primary Containers by Gold Nanoparticles. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100 (5), 1663–1670. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22410.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
74. 74.↵
    1. Chan E.,
    2. Hubbard A.,
    3. Sane S.,
    4. Maa Y.-F.

    Syringe Siliconization Process Investigation and Optimization. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2012, 66 (2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2012.00856.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar