Sensitization Assessment of Extractables and Leachables in Pharmaceuticals: ELSIE Database Analysis

References

1. 1.
   Health Council of the Netherlands. Hydroquinone and Benzoquinone. Health-Based Recommended Occupational Exposure Limit. Health Council of the Netherlands: The Hague, 2012; Vol. 2012/27.

   Google Scholar
2. 2.
   Registration Evaluation Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals Registration (REACH). p-benzoquinone. European Chemicals Agency, 2018. https://echa.europa.eu/it/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/24947/1. (accessed December 2020)

   Google Scholar
3. 3.
   Hazardous Substances Data Bank. 1,4-Benzoquinone. United States National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, 1996. http://documents.toxplanet.com/files/rendered/yiahvsbkg5e.htm. (accessed December 2020)

   Google Scholar
4. 4.
   International Agency for Research on Cancer. para-Quinone. In Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man: Vol. 15: Some Fumigants, the Herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Miscellaneous Industrial Chemicals; IARC, Lyon, France, 1977.

   Google Scholar
5. 5.
   National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Health Guideline for Quinone. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control, 1978

   Google Scholar
6. 6.
   1. Roberts D. W.,
   2. Patlewicz G.,
   3. Kern P. S.,
   4. Gerberick F.,
   5. Kimber I.,
   6. Dearman R. J.,
   7. Ryan C. A.,
   8. Basketter D. A.,
   9. Aptula A. O.

   Mechanistic Applicability Domain Classification of a Local Lymph Node Assay Dataset for Skin Sensitization. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2007, 20 (7), 1019–1030.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
7. 7.
   1. Gerberick G. F.,
   2. Ryan C. A.,
   3. Kern P. S.,
   4. Schlatter H.,
   5. Dearman R. J.,
   6. Kimber I.,
   7. Patlewicz G. Y.,
   8. Basketter D. A.

   Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods. Dermatitis 2005, 16 (4), 157–202.

   Google Scholar
8. 8.
   1. Basketter D. A.,
   2. Gooodwin B. F. J.

   Investigation of the Prohapten Concept. Cross Reactions between 1,4-Substituted Benzene Derivatives in the Guinea Pig. Contact Dermatitis 1988, 19 (4), 248–253.

   Google Scholar
9. 9.
   1. Magnusson B.,
   2. Kligman A. M.

   The Identification of Contact Allergens by Animal Assay. The Guinea Pig Maximization Test. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1969, 52 (3), 268–276.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
10. 10.
    1. Goodwin B. F. J.,
    2. Crevel R. W. R.,
    3. Johnson A. W.

    A Comparison of Three Guinea Pig Sensitization Procedures for the Detection of 19 Reported Human Contact Sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 1981, 7 (5), 248–258.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
11. 11.
    1. Tsuchiya S.,
    2. Kondo M.,
    3. Okamoto K.,
    4. Takase Y.

    Studies on Contact Hypersensitivity in the Guinea Pig. Contact Dermatitis 1982, 8 (4), 246–255.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar