Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleTechnology/Application

Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations

Camellia Zamiri, Danielle L. Leiske, Patricia Hughes, J. Paul Kirwan, Evelyn Der, Emily Cox, Rob Warburton, Monica Goss, Sarah Weiser, Janet Perez-Brown, Ganapathy Gopalrathnam, Jing Liu, Shyam B. Mehta, Shebeer Shereefa, Sebastian Specht, Sandra J. Aedo, Pierre Goldbach, Feng Jia, Barbara Kuehnle, Scott Page, Liesbeth Voeten, Li Yi and Chen Zhu
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology July 2024, 78 (4) 475-500; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012806
Camellia Zamiri
1Pharmaceutical Development, Genentech (A Member of the Roche group), South San Francisco, CA 94080;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: zamiri.camellia@gene.com danielle.leiske@abcellera.com
Danielle L. Leiske
2Product Quality Management, Seagen, Bothell, WA 98021;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: zamiri.camellia@gene.com danielle.leiske@abcellera.com
Patricia Hughes
3Office of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Assessment, Office of Product Quality, FDA/CDER, Silver Spring, MD 20993;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Paul Kirwan
4Global Regulatory Affairs and Strategy, CMC, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyn Der
5PTQP Analytical Sciences Chapter, Genentech (A Member of the Roche group), South San Francisco, CA 94080;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Cox
6BioPharmaceuticals Development, R&D, Dosage Form Design and Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob Warburton
7Bioproduct Research & Development, Lilly Research Laboratories Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica Goss
8Drug Product Technologies, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Weiser
9BTx PharmSci, Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Pfizer, Andover, MA 01810;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet Perez-Brown
10Microbiology Center of Excellence, BMS, New Brunswick, NJ 08903;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ganapathy Gopalrathnam
11Bioproduct Pharma Design, Lilly Research Laboratories Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Liu
12Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seagen, Bothell, WA 98021;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shyam B. Mehta
13Drug Product Development and Operations, CMC Biologics, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, West Chester, PA 19380;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shebeer Shereefa
14Regulatory Affairs CMC, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL 60064;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Specht
15Regulatory Affairs, CMC, Roche, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel 4070, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra J. Aedo
16BioTherapeutics Drug Product Development Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Research and Development, Malvern, PA 19355;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Goldbach
17Pharmaceutical Development & Supplies, Pharma Technical Development, Roche, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel 4070, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng Jia
18Biologics Drug Product, Biogen, Cambridge, MA 02142;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Kuehnle
19Pharmaceutical Development, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, 88397 Biberach /Riss, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Page
14Regulatory Affairs CMC, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL 60064;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liesbeth Voeten
20Analytical Development, Microbiology Center of Excellence Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Yi
21Formulation Development, AbbVie, South San Francisco, CA 94080; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chen Zhu
22Biologics Drug Product Development and Manufacturing, Sanofi, Framingham, MA, 01701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nejadnik M. R.,
    2. Randolph T. W.,
    3. Volkin D. B.,
    4. Schöneich C.,
    5. Carpenter J. F.,
    6. Crommelin D. J. A.,
    7. Jiskoot W.
    Postproduction Handling and Administration of Protein Pharmaceuticals and Potential Instability Issues. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 107 (8), 2013–2019.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jameel F.,
    2. Skoug J. W.,
    3. Nesbitt R. R.
    1. Gupta S.,
    2. Alaarg A.,
    3. Wu Z.,
    4. Lu X.,
    5. Garripelli V.,
    6. Dong H.,
    7. Sawilla S.,
    8. Patel B.,
    9. Schroeder R.
    Chapter 18: Design of Clinical In-Use studies. In Development of Biopharmaceutical Drug-Device Products, 1st ed.; Jameel F., Skoug J. W., Nesbitt R. R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp 431–459.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ricci M. S.,
    2. Frazier M.,
    3. Moore J.,
    4. Cromwell M.,
    5. Galush W. J.,
    6. Patel A. R.,
    7. Adler M.,
    8. Altenburger U.,
    9. Grauschopf U.,
    10. Goldbach P.,
    11. Fast J. L.,
    12. Krämer I.,
    13. Mahler H. C.
    In-Use Physicochemical and Microbiological Stability of Biological Parenteral Products. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2015, 72 (5), 396–407.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sarakbi I.,
    2. Federici M.,
    3. Krämer I.
    Viability of Microorganisms in Novel Chemical and Biopharmaceutical Anticancer Drug Solutions. Eur. J. Parenter. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 20 (1), 5–12.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <797> Pharmaceutical Compounding—Sterile Preparations. In USP 43–NF 38, USP: Rockville, MD, 2008.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hu Q.,
    2. Wu J.,
    3. Chu K. P.,
    4. Cao Y.,
    5. Kamen D.,
    6. Kleppe M.,
    7. Cheng Y.,
    8. Liu D.,
    9. Shameem M.
    Characterization of Microbial Growth Potential in Antibody Drug IV Admixtures by Microbial Challenge. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 112 (11), 2820–2833.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Metcalfe J. W.
    Microbiological Quality of Drug Products after Penetration of the Container System for Dose Preparation Prior to Patient Administration. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2009, 12 (1), 84–89.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lolas A. G.,
    2. Metcalfe J. W.
    Evaluation of the Microbial Growth Potential of Pharmaceutical Drug Products and Quality by Design. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2011, 65 (1), 63–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <800>Hazardous Drugs—Handling in Healthcare Settings. In USP 43–NF 38, USP: Rockville, MD, 2020.
  10. 10.↵
    International Conference for Harmonisation. Quality Guideline Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. ICH Web site. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q8%28R2%29%20Guideline.pdf (accessed October 2022).
  11. 11.↵
    International Conference for Harmonisation. Quality Guideline Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. ICH Web site. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q1A%28R2%29%20Guideline.pdf (accessed October 2022).
  12. 12.↵
    International Conference for Harmonisation. Quality Guideline Q5C: Quality of Biotechnological Products: Stability Testing of Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Web site. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q5C%20Guideline.pdf (accessed October 2022).
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bennett S. N.,
    2. McNeil M. M.,
    3. Bland L. A.,
    4. Arduino M. J.,
    5. Villarino M. E.,
    6. Perrotta D. M.,
    7. Burwen D. R.,
    8. Welbel S. F.,
    9. Pegues D. A.,
    10. Stroud L.,
    11. Zeitz P. S.,
    12. Jarvis W. R.
    Postoperative Infections Traced to Contamination of an Intravenous Anesthetic, Propofol. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333 (3), 147–154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Mattner F.,
    2. Gastmeier P.
    Bacterial Contamination of Multiple-Dose Vials: A Prevalence Study. Am. J. Infect. Control 2004, 32 (1), 12–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Manchikanti L.,
    2. Falco F. J. E.,
    3. Benyamin R. M.,
    4. Caraway D. L.,
    5. Helm Ii S.,
    6. Wargo B. W.,
    7. Hansen H.,
    8. Parr A. T.,
    9. Singh V.,
    10. Hirsch J. A.
    Assessment of Infection Control Practices for Interventional Techniques: A Best Evidence Synthesis of Safe Injection Practices and Use of Single-Dose Medication Vials. Pain Phys. 2012, 15 (5), E573–E614.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Question-Based Review (QbR) for Sterility Assurance of Terminally Sterilized Products: Frequently Asked Questions. FDA Web site. https://www.fda.gov/media/81734/download (accessed May 2023).
  17. 17.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR Part 201–Labeling, Section 201.56(a) General Requirements. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Publishing Office: Washington D.C. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-201 (accessed October 2022).
  18. 18.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR Part 201–Labeling, Section 201.57(c)(3) Dosage and Administration. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Publishing Office: Washington D.C. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-201 (accessed October 2022).
  19. 19.↵
    U.S. Congress. United States Code: The Public Health Service, 42 U.S.C. §§ 201-291n. Library of Congress: Washington D.C. https://www.loc.gov/item/uscode1952-004042006a/ (accessed October 2022).
  20. 20.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR Part 201–Labeling, Section 201.5(g) Drugs; Adequate Directions for Use. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Publishing Office: Washington D.C. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-201#p-201.5(Adequate%20directions%20for%20use (accessed October 2022).
  21. 21.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR Part 211–Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals, Section 211.137 Expiration Dating. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Publishing Office: Washington D.C. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-211/subpart-G (accessed October 2022).
  22. 22.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR Part 211–Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals, Section 211.166 Stability Testing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Publishing Office: Washington D.C. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-211/subpart-I (accessed October 2022).
  23. 23.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Dosage and Administration Section of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products—Content and Format, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Rockville, MD, 2010.
  24. 24.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Mixing, Diluting, or Repackaging Biological Products Outside the Scope of an Approved Biologics License Application, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Rockville, MD, 2018.
  25. 25.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Content and Format of Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) for Phase 1 Studies of Drugs, Including Well Characterized, Therapeutic, Biotechnology-Derived Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Rockville, MD, 1995.
  26. 26.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Phase 1 Investigational Drugs, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Rockville, MD, 2008.
  27. 27.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter <51> Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing. In USP 43–NF 38, USP: Rockville, MD, 2018.
  28. 28.↵
    European Medicines Agency. Note for Guidance on Maximum Shelf-Life for Sterile Products for Human Use after First Opening or Following Reconstitution. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP): London, 1998.
  29. 29.↵
    Australian Government. Stability Testing for Prescription Medicines: Guidance for Sponsors on Demonstrating Stability of Medicines under Australian Conditions. 14.2, General Guidance. Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care, Therapeutic Goods Administration: https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resource/guidance/stability-testing-prescription-medicines/142-general-guidance (accessed May 2023).
  30. 30.↵
    Health Canada. Guidance Document: Product Monograph (2020). 11. Storage, Stability and Disposal. Government of Canada: Ottawa, ON: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/product-monograph/guidance-document-product-monograph-2020.html (accessed May 2023).
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hughes P.
    Regulatory Perspectives In-Use Storage of Biologic Products: Phase Appropriate Microbial Challenge Studies. CASSS Midwest Regional Virtual Forum 2020.
  32. 32.↵
    Council of Europe, Efficacy of Antimicrobial Preservation, Chapter 5.1.3. In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 11th Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2020.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Willey J. M.,
    2. Sherwood L.,
    3. Woolverton C. J.
    Prescott's Microbiology, 8th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2011; pp 796–797.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sandle T.
    A Review of Cleanroom Microflora: Types, Trends, and Patterns. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2011, 65 (4), 392–403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Nogler-Semenitz E.,
    2. Lass-Flörl C.,
    3. Nogler M.,
    4. Speer G.,
    5. Dierich M. P.
    Bacterial Contamination of Solutions for Parenteral Administration for Single- and Multiple-Dose Vials after Multiple Use in the Hospital. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2007, 157 (15-16), 398–401.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Trautmann M.,
    2. Zauser B.,
    3. Wiedeck H.,
    4. Buttenschön K.,
    5. Marre R.
    Bacterial Colonization and Endotoxin Contamination of Intravenous Infusion Fluids. J. Hosp. Infect. 1997, 37 (3), 225–236.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Matsaniotis N. S.,
    2. Syriopoulou V. P.,
    3. Theodoridou M. C.,
    4. Tzanetou K. G.,
    5. Mostrou G. I.
    Enterobacter Sepsis in Infants and Children Due to Contaminated Intravenous Fluids. Infect. Control 1984, 5 (10), 471–477.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Maragakis L. L.,
    2. Chaiwarith R.,
    3. Srinivasan A.,
    4. Torriani F. J.,
    5. Avdic E.,
    6. Lee A.,
    7. Ross T. R.,
    8. Carroll K. C.,
    9. Perl T. M.
    Sphingomonas paucimobilis Bloodstream Infections Associated with Contaminated Intravenous Fentanyl. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15 (1), 12–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    ATCC (American Type Culture Collection). Microbe Products. https://www.atcc.org/ (accessed October 2022).
  40. 40.↵
    Council of Europe. Microbiological Examination of Non-Sterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests, Chapter 2.6.12. In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 10th Edition, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2021.
  41. 41.↵
    Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare of Japan. Chapter 4.05. Microbial Examination of Non-Sterile products. In The Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 18th Edition (English Version), MHLW: Tokyo, 2021.
  42. 42.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, General Chapter <61> Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests. In USP 43–NF 38, USP: Rockville, MD, 2013.
  43. 43.↵
    Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare of Japan. General Information <G4-3-170> Preservatives-Effectiveness Tests. In The Japanese Pharmacopoeia, 18th Edition (English Version), MHLW: Tokyo, 2021.
  44. 44.↵
    Blincyto® (Blinatumomab) for Injection, for Intravenous Use Prescribing Information. https://www.pi.amgen.com/∼/media/amgen/repositorysites/pi-amgen-com/blincyto/blincyto_pi_hcp_english.pdf.
  45. 45.↵
    American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). The ASHP Discussion Guide on USP Chapter <797>. https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/pharmacy-practice/resource-centers/sterile-compounding/ashp-discussion-guide-on-usp-chapter-797.pdf (accessed October 2022).
  46. 46.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Compounding and the FDA: Questions and Answers. FDA Web site. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/human-drug-compounding/compounding-and-fda-questions-and-answers#what (accessed October 2022).
  47. 47.↵
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR Section 353a. Pharmacy Compounding. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Publishing Office: Washington D.C. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title21/pdf/USCODE-2011-title21-chap9-subchapV-partA-sec353a.pdf (accessed October 2022).
  48. 48.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. Proposed Revisions to <797> Pharmaceutical Compounding—Sterile Preparations. https://go.usp.org/Proposed_2021_Revisions_795_797 (accessed October 2022).
  49. 49.↵
    Virginia Department of Health Professions Board of Medicine. 18vac85-20-410. Requirements for Low-Risk, Medium-Risk, or High-Risk Sterile Mixing, Diluting or Reconstituting. https://www.dhp.virginia.gov/medicine/newsletters/BoardBrief89.pdf (accessed October 2022).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology: 78 (4)
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 78, Issue 4
July/August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations
Camellia Zamiri, Danielle L. Leiske, Patricia Hughes, J. Paul Kirwan, Evelyn Der, Emily Cox, Rob Warburton, Monica Goss, Sarah Weiser, Janet Perez-Brown, Ganapathy Gopalrathnam, Jing Liu, Shyam B. Mehta, Shebeer Shereefa, Sebastian Specht, Sandra J. Aedo, Pierre Goldbach, Feng Jia, Barbara Kuehnle, Scott Page, Liesbeth Voeten, Li Yi, Chen Zhu
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jul 2024, 78 (4) 475-500; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012806

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations
Camellia Zamiri, Danielle L. Leiske, Patricia Hughes, J. Paul Kirwan, Evelyn Der, Emily Cox, Rob Warburton, Monica Goss, Sarah Weiser, Janet Perez-Brown, Ganapathy Gopalrathnam, Jing Liu, Shyam B. Mehta, Shebeer Shereefa, Sebastian Specht, Sandra J. Aedo, Pierre Goldbach, Feng Jia, Barbara Kuehnle, Scott Page, Liesbeth Voeten, Li Yi, Chen Zhu
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Jul 2024, 78 (4) 475-500; DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012806
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Global Regulatory Expectations
    • 3. Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Study Design and Execution
    • 4. Interpretation of Microbial Growth and Assignment of In-Use Hold Time
    • 5. Other Considerations
    • 6. USP <797> and Sterile Preparations in Pharmacies
    • 7. Conclusions
    • Conflict of Interest Statement
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Mechanical Container Closure Integrity Test: A Method for Cartridge Systems
  • Practical application of setting up an annual Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) assessment
  • A Container Closure Integrity Test Method for Vials Stored at Cryogenic Conditions Using Headspace Oxygen Analysis
Show more Technology/Application

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Microbial challenge in-use studies
  • Microbial stability
  • In-use hold
  • In-use storage
  • Microbial growth
  • Microbial contamination
  • USP <51>
  • Microorganisms
  • Interpretation of microbial data

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire