Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
  • .
    • Visit PDA
    • PDA Letter
    • Technical Reports
    • news uPDATe
    • Bookstore
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Accepted Articles
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS
    • Terms of Use
  • About PDA JPST
    • JPST Editors and Editorial Board
    • About/Vision/Mission
    • Paper of the Year
  • Author & Reviewer Resources
    • Author Resources / Submit
    • Reviewer Resources
  • JPST Access and Subscriptions
    • PDA Members
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Nonmember Access
  • Support
    • Join PDA
    • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Advertising
    • CiteTrack
  • Follow pda on Twitter
  • Visit PDA on LinkedIn
  • Visit pda on Facebook
Research ArticleRESEARCH

Assessing Parallelism Prior to Determining Relative Potency

Walter W. Hauck, Robert C. Capen, Janice D. Callahan, James E. De Muth, Henry Hsu, David Lansky, Nancy C. Sajjadi, Sally S. Seaver, Robert R. Singer and Doris Weisman
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology March 2005, 59 (2) 127-137;
Walter W. Hauck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: whauck@mail.jci.tju.edu
Robert C. Capen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janice D. Callahan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E. De Muth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry Hsu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Lansky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy C. Sajjadi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally S. Seaver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Singer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doris Weisman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the course of preparing a revision to Chapter 〈111〉 of the US Pharmacopeia, the revision committee came to a unanimous agreement that the method for assessing parallelism that is currently presented in 〈111〉 and in the European Pharmacopeia's Chapter 5.3 is flawed and should be replaced. The symptoms are that perfectly acceptable assay results may fail due to good precision and that obviously faulty assay results may pass due to poor precision. The flaw is that the wrong statistical technique has been used. We propose an alternative approach based on the equivalence testing paradigm that does not have these shortcomings. Equivalence testing requires the establishment of equivalence limits. Specific approaches for establishing equivalence limits are discussed.

  • Bioassay
  • Parallelism
  • Similarity
  • Hypothesis testing

Footnotes

  • Copyright © Parenteral Drug Association. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In This Issue

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 59, Issue 2
March/April 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Assessing Parallelism Prior to Determining Relative Potency
Walter W. Hauck, Robert C. Capen, Janice D. Callahan, James E. De Muth, Henry Hsu, David Lansky, Nancy C. Sajjadi, Sally S. Seaver, Robert R. Singer, Doris Weisman
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2005, 59 (2) 127-137;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget

Jump to section

  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Novel Lack-of-Fit Assessment as a System Suitability Test for Potency Assays
  • Parallelism in Practice: Approaches to Parallelism in Bioassays
  • Implementation of Parallelism Testing for Four-Parameter Logistic Model in Bioassays
  • Assessing Similarity in Bioanalytical Methods
  • Interlaboratory Comparison of Results of an Anthrax Lethal Toxin Neutralization Assay for Assessment of Functional Antibodies in Multiple Species
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Preservative Efficacy Testing of Refrigerated Pharmaceuticals: Choice of Challenging Isolate and Storage Temperature
  • Analysis of Virus Clearance for Biotechnology Manufacturing Processes from Early to Late Phase Development
  • Coring and Fragmentation of Elastomeric Needle Shield in a Pre-Filled Syringe
Show more Research

Similar Articles

  • Parallelism in Practice: Approaches to Parallelism in Bioassays
  • A Novel Method for Qualification of a Potency Assay through Partial Computer Simulation
  • A Novel Lack-of-Fit Assessment as a System Suitability Test for Potency Assays
  • Implementation of Parallelism Testing for Four-Parameter Logistic Model in Bioassays
  • Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management
See more

Readers

  • About
  • Table of Content Alerts/Other Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Editors

Author/Reviewer Information

  • Author Resources
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Editors

Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.

  • About
  • Advertising/Sponsorships
  • Events
  • PDA Bookstore
  • Press Releases

© 2025 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Print ISSN: 1079-7440  Digital ISSN: 1948-2124

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Parallelism Prior to Determining Relative Potency
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessing Parallelism Prior to Determining Relative Potency
Walter W. Hauck, Robert C. Capen, Janice D. Callahan, James E. De Muth, Henry Hsu, David Lansky, Nancy C. Sajjadi, Sally S. Seaver, Robert R. Singer, Doris Weisman
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Mar 2005, 59 (2) 127-137;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.