Measurement of Solution Composition as an Alternative to Titration for Evaluating the Hydrolytic Resistance of Glass

References

1. 1.↵
   U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, General Chapter <660> Containers—Glass. In USP 41—NF 36, USP: Rockville, MD, 2018.

   Google Scholar
2. 2.↵
   Council of Europe, Glass Containers for Pharmaceutical Use, Chapter 3.2.1, In European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), 9th Edition, version 9.6, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, 2018.

   Google Scholar
3. 3.↵
   International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4802-1:2016 Glassware—Hydrolytic Resistance of the Interior Surfaces of Glass Containers—Part 1: Determination by Titration Method and Classification. ISO: Geneva, 2016.

   Google Scholar
4. 4.↵
   1. Guadagnino E.,
   2. Corumluoglu O.,
   3. Sundberg P.

   Influence of Some Parameters on the Approximation of European Pharmacopoeia and ISO Standard 4802: Reasons for Harmonisation. Glass Technol. 2000, 41 (3), 91–98.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4802-2:2016 Glassware—Hydrolytic Resistance of the Interior Surfaces of Glass Containers—Part 2: Determination by Flame Spectrometry and Classification. ISO: Geneva, 2016.

   Google Scholar
6. 6.↵
   1. Brezonik P. L.,
   2. Arnold W. A.

   Water Chemistry: An Introduction to the Chemistry of Natural and Engineered Aquatic Systems, 11th ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 2011.

   Google Scholar
7. 7.↵
   1. Barrow G. M.

   Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, 1973.

   Google Scholar
8. 8.↵
   1. Benjamin M. M.

   Water Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL, 2015.

   Google Scholar
9. 9.↵
   1. Anderson G.

   Thermodynamics of Natural Systems, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2005.

   Google Scholar
10. 10.↵
    1. Stumm W.,
    2. Morgan J. J.

    Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar
11. 11.↵
    1. Pitzer K. S.

    Thermodynamics of Electrolytes. I. Theoretical Basis and General Equations. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77 (2), 268–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    FactSage, version 8.0. CRCT Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada and GTT-Technologies. Herzogenrath, Germany, 2015. http://www.factsage.com (accessed March 14, 2023).

    Google Scholar
13. 13.↵
    OLI Studio, version 9.3; OLI Systems, Inc., Cedar Knolls, NJ, 2016. https://www.olisystems.com/oli-studio-stream-analyzer (accessed March 14, 2023).

    Google Scholar
14. 14.↵
    Gustafsson, J. P. VisualMINTEQ, version 3.1; KTH, Sweden, 2016. https://vminteq.lwr.kth.se/ (accessed March 14, 2023).

    Google Scholar
15. 15.↵
    1. Johnson J. W.,
    2. Oelkers E. H.,
    3. Helgeson H. C.

    SUPCRT92: A Software Package for Calculating the Standard Molal Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals, Gases, Aqueous Species, and Reactions from 1 to 5000 Bar and 0 to 1000°C. Comput. Geosci. 1992, 18 (7), 899–947.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    1. Kolthoff I. M.

    Acid-Base Indicators; The Macmillan Company: New York, 1937.

    Google Scholar
17. 17.↵
    1. Tawarah K. M.,
    2. Abu-Shamleh H. M.

    A Spectrophotometric Study of the Acid-Base Equilibria of o-Methyl Red in Aqueous Solutions. Dyes Pigm. 1991, 17 (3), 203–215.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    1. Khouri S. J.,
    2. Abdel-Rahim I. A.,
    3. Alshamaileh E. M.,
    4. Altwaiq A. M.

    Equilibrium and Structural Study of m-Methyl Red in Aqueous Solutions: Distribution Diagram Construction. J. Solution Chem. 2013, 42 (9), 1844–1853.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    1. Zhang J.-H.,
    2. Liu Q.,
    3. Chen Y.-M.,
    4. Liu Z.-Q.,
    5. Xu C.-W.

    Determination of Acid Dissociation Constant of Methyl Red by Multi-Peaks Gaussian Fitting Method Based on UV-Visible Absorption Spectrum. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2012, 28 (5), 1030–1036.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    1. Hamilton E. H.,
    2. Hubbard D.

    Titration and Conductivity Measurements of Aqueous Extracts from Bottles. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1941, 27 (4), 381–394.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
21. 21.↵
    1. Bulska E.,
    2. Wagner B.

    Quantitative Aspects of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., A. 2016, 374 (2079), 20150369.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
22. 22.↵
    1. Fujimori K.,
    2. Lee H.,
    3. Sloey C.,
    4. Ricci M. S.,
    5. Wen Z.-Q.,
    6. Phillips J.,
    7. Nashed-Samuel Y.

    Comparison of Acid Titration, Conductivity, Flame Photometry, ICP-MS, and Accelerated Lamellae Formation Techniques in Determining Glass Vial Quality. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2016, 70 (3), 248–255.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
23. 23.↵
    1. Bockris J. O.,
    2. Reddy A. K. N.

    Modern Electrochemistry; Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York, 1977; Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar
24. 24.↵
    1. Wang P.,
    2. Anderko A.,
    3. Young R. D.

    A Speciation Based Model for Mixed-Solvent Electrolyte Systems. Fluid Phase Equilib.2002, 203 (1–2), 141–176.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
25. 25.↵
    1. Wang P.,
    2. Anderko A.,
    3. Springer R. D.,
    4. Kosinski J. J.,
    5. Lencka M. M.

    Modeling Chemical and Phase Equilibria in Geochemical Systems Using a Speciation-Based Model. J. Geochem. Explor. 2010, 106 (1–3), 219–225.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    1. Hinson A. L.,
    2. Smith D. C.,
    3. Greene J. F.

    Changes in Distilled Water Stored in Glass Ampuls. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1947, 30 (7), 211–214.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
27. 27.↵
    1. Bohrer D.,
    2. Do Nascimento P. C.,
    3. Becker E.,
    4. Bortoluzzi F.,
    5. Depoi F.,
    6. deCarvalho L. M.

    Critical Evaluation of the Standard Hydrolytic Resistance Test for Glasses Used for Containers for Blood and Parenteral Formulations. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2004, 58 (2), 96–105.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
28. 28.↵
    1. Fagerlund S.

    Understanding the In Vitro Dissolution Rate of Glasses with Respect to Future Clinical Applications, PhD Thesis, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland, 2012.

    Google Scholar
29. 29.↵
    1. Kramer D.,
    2. Schaut R.,
    3. Bakowska E.,
    4. Riesbeck M.,
    5. Thomas A.,
    6. Tietje S.

    Extractables Testing of Aluminosilicate and Borosilicate Glass Containers. PDA Letter 2018, 1, 19–20.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
30. 30.↵
    1. Bacon F. R.,
    2. Burch O. G.

    Effect of Time and Temperature on Accelerated Chemical Durability Tests Made on Commercial Glass Bottles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1940, 23 (1), 1–9.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
31. 31.↵
    1. Schaut R. A.,
    2. Weeks W. P.

    Historical Review of Glasses Used for Parenteral Packaging. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2017, 71 (4), 279–296.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
32. 32.↵
    1. Iacocca R. G.,
    2. Toltl N.,
    3. Allgeier M.,
    4. Bustard B.,
    5. Dong X.,
    6. Foubert M.,
    7. Hofer J.,
    8. Peoples S.,
    9. Shelbourn T.

    Factors Affecting the Chemical Durability of Glass Used in the Pharmaceutical Industry. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010, 11 (3), 1340–1349.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
33. 33.↵
    1. Lisman D.

    Use of Autotitrators for Glass Grains and Surface Tests Titration Methods. Presented at the USP Workshop on Modernization of USP Packaging Standards for Glass and Elastomeric Components, Rockville, MD, June 19–20, 2017.

    Google Scholar