Correlating GC/MS Relative Response Factors to Analyte’s Physicochemical and Chromatographic Properties to Facilitate the Quantitation of Organic Extractables and Leachables in Non-Targeted Analysis (NTA). Concepts and Empirical Considerations

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Jordi M. A.,
   2. Khera S.,
   3. Roland K.,
   4. Jiang L.,
   5. Solomon P.,
   6. Nelson J.,
   7. Lateef S. S.,
   8. Woods J.,
   9. Martin L.,
   10. Martin S.,
   11. Aiello F.,
   12. Chen N.

   Qualitative Assessment of Extractables from Single-Use Components and the Impact of Reference Standard Selection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 368–376.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Zdravkovic S. A.,
   2. Duong C. T.,
   3. Hellenbrand A. A.,
   4. Duff S. R.,
   5. Dreger A. L.

   Establishment of a Reference Standard Database for Use in the Qualitative and Semi-Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Contact Materials within an Extractables Survey by GC–MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 151, 49–60.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.
   1. Christiaens P.,
   2. Beusen J.-M.,
   3. Verlinde P.,
   4. Baeten J.,
   5. Jenke D.

   Identifying and Mitigating Errors in Screening for Organic Extractables and Leachables: Part 2—The Errors of Inexact Identification and Inaccurate Quantitation. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2020, 74 (1), 108–133.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.
   1. Jordi M. A.,
   2. Rowland K.,
   3. Liu W.,
   4. Cao X.,
   5. Zong J.,
   6. Ren Y.,
   7. Liang Z.,
   8. Zhou X.,
   9. Louis M.,
   10. Lerner K.

   Reducing Relative Response Factor Variation Using a Multidetector System for Extractables and Leachables (E&L) Analysis to Mitigate the Need for Uncertainty Factors. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 186, 113334

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Jenke D.,
   2. Christiaens P.,
   3. Beusen J.-M.,
   4. Verlinde P.,
   5. Baeten J.

   A Practical Derivation of the Uncertainty Factor Applied to Adjust the Extractables/Leachables Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) for Response Factor Variation. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2022, 76 (3), 178–199.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Sussman E. M.,
   2. Oktem B.,
   3. Isayeva I. S.,
   4. Liu J.,
   5. Wickramasekara S.,
   6. Chandrasekar V.,
   7. Nahan K.,
   8. Shin H. Y.,
   9. Zheng J.

   Chemical Characterization and Non-Targeted Analysis of Medical Device Extracts: A Review of Current Approaches, Gaps, and Emerging Practices. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8 (3), 939–963.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Jenke D.

   Accurate or Protective: What is the Goal of Non-Targeted Extractables and Leachables Quantitation and Identification? PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2024, 78 (3), 358–366.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Fisher C. M.,
   2. Peter K. T.,
   3. Newton S. R.,
   4. Schaub A. J.,
   5. Sobus J. R.

   Approaches for Assessing Performance of High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry–Based Non-Targeted Analysis Methods. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414 (22), 6455–6471.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Jenke D.,
   2. Christiaens P.,
   3. Verlinde P.,
   4. Baeten J.,
   5. Beusen J.-M.

   Is Retention Time and/or Structure Matching a Solution to the Challenge of Providing Quantitative Data When Screening for Extractables and Leachables by GC/MS? PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2022, 76 (3), 236–247.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10993-18 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 18: Chemical Characterization of Medical Device Materials Within a Risk Management Process. ISO: Geneva, 2020.
11. 11.↵
    PQRI Leachables and Extractables Working Group. Safety Thresholds and Best Practices for Extractables and Leachables in Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products, 2006. https://pqri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/PQRI-PDPRecommendation-2022.pdf. (accessed November 2, 2024)
12. 12.↵
    PQRI PODP Leachables and Extractables Working Group. Safety Thresholds and Best Demonstrated Practices for Extractables and Leachables in Parenteral Drug Products (Intravenous, Subcutaneous, and Intramuscular). Product Quality Research Institute, 2021.
13. 13.↵
    1. Bergmann A. J.,
    2. Points G. L.,
    3. Scott R. P.,
    4. Wilson G.,
    5. Anderson K. A.

    Development of Quantitative Screen for 1550 Chemicals with GC-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410 (13), 3101–3110.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Schummer C.,
    2. Delhomme O.,
    3. Appenzeller B. M. R.,
    4. Wennig R.,
    5. Millet M.

    Comparison of MTBSTFA and BSTFA in Derivatization Reactions of Polar Compounds Prior to GC/MS Analysis. Talanta 2009, 77 (4), 1473–1482.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wang Y.,
    2. Sun S.,
    3. Yang F.,
    4. Li S.,
    5. Wu J.,
    6. Liu J.,
    7. Zhong S.,
    8. Zeng J.

    The Effects of Activated Al₂O₃ on the Recycling of Light Oil from the Catalytic Pyrolysis of Waste Printed Circuit Boards. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2015, 98, 276–284.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Goodner K. L.

    Practical Retention Index Models of OV-101, DB-1, DB-5, and DB-Wax for Flavor and Fragrance Compounds. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41 (6), 951–958.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Wijit N.,
    2. Prasitwattanaseree S.,
    3. Mahatheeranont S.,
    4. Wolschann P.,
    5. Jiranusornkul S.,
    6. Nimmanpipug P.

    Estimation of Retention Time in GC/MS of Volatile Metabolites in Fragrant Rice Using Principal Components of Molecular Descriptors. Anal. Sci. 2017, 33 (11), 1211–1217.

    OpenUrlPubMed